辽宁医学院学报
遼寧醫學院學報
료녕의학원학보
JOURNAL OF LIAONING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2014年
3期
24-27
,共4页
刘洪香%任春娥%张安清%窦晓卫%柏宏伟
劉洪香%任春娥%張安清%竇曉衛%柏宏偉
류홍향%임춘아%장안청%두효위%백굉위
辅助生殖技术%meta分析%体格发育
輔助生殖技術%meta分析%體格髮育
보조생식기술%meta분석%체격발육
assisted reproductive technology%meta analysis%physical development
目的探讨辅助生殖技术( Assisted Reproductive Technology, ART)婴幼儿的体格发育情况,评价ART的安全性。方法计算机检索中国学术期刊网络出版总库,维普中文科技期刊全文数据库,中国博士学位论文全文数据库, PubMed, EBSCO 全文数据库,德国 SPRINGER 公司期刊数据库,和 Cochrane Library 等,并辅助其他检索方式,纳入 ART术后妊娠和自然妊娠( Nature conceived, NC)出生的0~3岁婴幼儿体格发育状况比较的队列研究,并使用 RevMan 5.0进行 Meta分析。结果 meta分析结果显示辅助生殖技术子代体格发育与自然妊娠儿相比,差异无统计学意义( P=0.14)。其 OR (95%CI)为OR=1.80,95%CI (0.83,3.92)。结论辅助生殖技术婴幼儿生长发育与自然妊娠儿无差异,提示ART不影响婴幼儿体格发育。
目的探討輔助生殖技術( Assisted Reproductive Technology, ART)嬰幼兒的體格髮育情況,評價ART的安全性。方法計算機檢索中國學術期刊網絡齣版總庫,維普中文科技期刊全文數據庫,中國博士學位論文全文數據庫, PubMed, EBSCO 全文數據庫,德國 SPRINGER 公司期刊數據庫,和 Cochrane Library 等,併輔助其他檢索方式,納入 ART術後妊娠和自然妊娠( Nature conceived, NC)齣生的0~3歲嬰幼兒體格髮育狀況比較的隊列研究,併使用 RevMan 5.0進行 Meta分析。結果 meta分析結果顯示輔助生殖技術子代體格髮育與自然妊娠兒相比,差異無統計學意義( P=0.14)。其 OR (95%CI)為OR=1.80,95%CI (0.83,3.92)。結論輔助生殖技術嬰幼兒生長髮育與自然妊娠兒無差異,提示ART不影響嬰幼兒體格髮育。
목적탐토보조생식기술( Assisted Reproductive Technology, ART)영유인적체격발육정황,평개ART적안전성。방법계산궤검색중국학술기간망락출판총고,유보중문과기기간전문수거고,중국박사학위논문전문수거고, PubMed, EBSCO 전문수거고,덕국 SPRINGER 공사기간수거고,화 Cochrane Library 등,병보조기타검색방식,납입 ART술후임신화자연임신( Nature conceived, NC)출생적0~3세영유인체격발육상황비교적대렬연구,병사용 RevMan 5.0진행 Meta분석。결과 meta분석결과현시보조생식기술자대체격발육여자연임신인상비,차이무통계학의의( P=0.14)。기 OR (95%CI)위OR=1.80,95%CI (0.83,3.92)。결론보조생식기술영유인생장발육여자연임신인무차이,제시ART불영향영유인체격발육。
Objective To evaluate the safety of ART by assessing physical development of children born with assisted reproduc-tive technology ( ART) . Methods Cohort study of the comparison between physical development of 0~ 3-year-old children con-ceived by assisted reproductive technology and by nature conceived ( NC) was conducted in China Academic Journal Network Publish-ing Database, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, China Doctoral Dissertations Full-text Database, PubMed, EBSCO, Springer-Link, Cochrane Library and other relevant resource websites. Assisted by RevMan 5.0, the result was processed by meta a-nalysis. Results Results of meta analysis showed that in terms of physical growth of children, there was no statistically significant difference between the assisted reproductive technology and natural pregnancy . (P=0.14) OR ( 95%CI) =1.80, 95%CI (0.83, 3.92). Conclusion Assisted reproductive technology does not affect the physical development of infants.