暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版)
暨南大學學報(自然科學與醫學版)
기남대학학보(자연과학여의학판)
JOURNAL OF JINAN UNIVERSITY(NATURAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE EDITION)
2014年
3期
228-234
,共7页
李嘉雯%江涛%吴锋%江天久
李嘉雯%江濤%吳鋒%江天久
리가문%강도%오봉%강천구
珠江口海域%大亚湾%腹泻性贝毒%小白鼠生物测定法
珠江口海域%大亞灣%腹瀉性貝毒%小白鼠生物測定法
주강구해역%대아만%복사성패독%소백서생물측정법
PearlRiverestuary%Dayabay%diarrheticshellfishpoisoning(DSP)%mousebioas-say
于2008年7月至2009年5月间,在珠江口与大亚湾海域设16个采样点,每季度采样1次,共采集了19个贝类品种139份样品,用小白鼠生物测定法进行腹泻性贝毒测定.结果显示,大亚湾春季的毒素阳性检出率最大,高达69.2%,珠江口仅为36%;就毒素超标率而言,大亚湾秋季最高,为66.7%,珠江口冬季最高,为36.8%;而夏季样品阳性检出率和超标率均最低,大亚湾阳性检出率和超标率分别为44.4%和22.2%,珠江口为7.7%和3.8%.对样品毒力值而言,毒力值为0.05 Mu/g的样品,两个区域各个季节都有检出,大亚湾冬季和春季样品检出率最大,均为38.5%,珠江口冬季最大,为26.3%;毒力值为0.1 Mu/g时,大亚湾在秋季和春季检出,分别为8.3%和15.4%;珠江口在秋季和冬季有检出,分别为4.7%和10.5%.采自大亚湾样品的最大毒力值在秋季,高达0.2 Mu/g,珠江口则未检出.贝类对DSP的积累存在种间差异,泥蚶,褶牡蛎的阳性检出率和超标率相对较高,其他较低.
于2008年7月至2009年5月間,在珠江口與大亞灣海域設16箇採樣點,每季度採樣1次,共採集瞭19箇貝類品種139份樣品,用小白鼠生物測定法進行腹瀉性貝毒測定.結果顯示,大亞灣春季的毒素暘性檢齣率最大,高達69.2%,珠江口僅為36%;就毒素超標率而言,大亞灣鞦季最高,為66.7%,珠江口鼕季最高,為36.8%;而夏季樣品暘性檢齣率和超標率均最低,大亞灣暘性檢齣率和超標率分彆為44.4%和22.2%,珠江口為7.7%和3.8%.對樣品毒力值而言,毒力值為0.05 Mu/g的樣品,兩箇區域各箇季節都有檢齣,大亞灣鼕季和春季樣品檢齣率最大,均為38.5%,珠江口鼕季最大,為26.3%;毒力值為0.1 Mu/g時,大亞灣在鞦季和春季檢齣,分彆為8.3%和15.4%;珠江口在鞦季和鼕季有檢齣,分彆為4.7%和10.5%.採自大亞灣樣品的最大毒力值在鞦季,高達0.2 Mu/g,珠江口則未檢齣.貝類對DSP的積纍存在種間差異,泥蚶,褶牡蠣的暘性檢齣率和超標率相對較高,其他較低.
우2008년7월지2009년5월간,재주강구여대아만해역설16개채양점,매계도채양1차,공채집료19개패류품충139빈양품,용소백서생물측정법진행복사성패독측정.결과현시,대아만춘계적독소양성검출솔최대,고체69.2%,주강구부위36%;취독소초표솔이언,대아만추계최고,위66.7%,주강구동계최고,위36.8%;이하계양품양성검출솔화초표솔균최저,대아만양성검출솔화초표솔분별위44.4%화22.2%,주강구위7.7%화3.8%.대양품독력치이언,독력치위0.05 Mu/g적양품,량개구역각개계절도유검출,대아만동계화춘계양품검출솔최대,균위38.5%,주강구동계최대,위26.3%;독력치위0.1 Mu/g시,대아만재추계화춘계검출,분별위8.3%화15.4%;주강구재추계화동계유검출,분별위4.7%화10.5%.채자대아만양품적최대독력치재추계,고체0.2 Mu/g,주강구칙미검출.패류대DSP적적루존재충간차이,니감,습모려적양성검출솔화초표솔상대교고,기타교저.
Inordertounderstandthedistributionpatternofdiarrheticshellfishpoisoning(DSP)in the Pearl River estuary and Daya bay,totally 1 41 samples of 1 9 shellfishes were sampled from 1 6 sam-pling sites from July 2008 to May 2009 .The toxins were determined with the mouse bioassay and results showed that the highest positive rate of Daya Bay was in spring,which up to 69.2%.By contrast,the highest positive rate of the Pearl River estuary was in winter with the rate of 69.2%.The over-standard rate of Daya bay was highest in autumn with the rate of 66.7%,by contrast,samples from the Pearl Riv-er estuary had the highest over-standard rate of 36.8%in winter.In summer,both positive rate and over-standard rate of the Pearl River estuary and Daya Bay were the lowest.Positive rate and over-standard rate of Daya bay were 44.4%and 22.2%,respectively.Positive rate and over-standard rate of the Pearl River estuary were 7.7%and 3.8%,respectively.Samples with toxicity of 0.05 Mu/g were detected in both the Pearl River estuary and Daya bay in each quarter.Samples collected from Daya bay in spring and winter both had the highest rate of 38.5%,and the Pearl River estuary in winter had the highest rate of 26.3%.Sample with toxicity of 0.1 Mu/g was detected in Daya bay in autumn and spring with detec-ted rate of 8.3% and 1 5.4%,respectively.4.7% and 1 0.5% of the samples collected from the Pearl River estuary in autumn and winter also had the toxicity of 0.1 Mu/g.25%of the samples collected from Daya Bay in autumn had the toxicity of 0.2 Mu/g.No sample with toxicity of 0.2 Mu/g was detected in the Pearl River estuary.Accumulation of DSP had interspecific differences in shellfish.Positive rate and over-standard rate of Tegillarca granosa and Ostrea plicatula were relatively higher than the other shell-fishes species.