计算机工程
計算機工程
계산궤공정
COMPUTER ENGINEERING
2014年
5期
49-53,58
,共6页
宋亚楠%仲茜%曲光亮%李兴立
宋亞楠%仲茜%麯光亮%李興立
송아남%중천%곡광량%리흥립
效用%效用函数%边际效用%无线网络%资源分配%多基站协作
效用%效用函數%邊際效用%無線網絡%資源分配%多基站協作
효용%효용함수%변제효용%무선망락%자원분배%다기참협작
utility%utility function%marginal utility%wireless network%resource allocation%multi-base-station cooperation
现有基于效用的无线网络资源分配方法大多未考虑网络整体效用最优的问题,只关注基站内的资源分配最优化,没有将基站选择问题与基站内资源分配问题相结合。鉴于此,提出一种基于效用的多基站协作无线资源分配方法,将无线网络资源分配划分为2个阶段,即基于拥塞度选择基站与基于边际效用实现基站内的资源分配。仿真实验结果表明,在268次基站选择中,该方法与效用最优的基线方法有218次相同,占81.3%,但其平均用时只有0.066 s,远低于基线方法的0.926 s,从而验证了该基站选择方法的合理性,以及基站内资源分配方法的有效性和高效性。
現有基于效用的無線網絡資源分配方法大多未攷慮網絡整體效用最優的問題,隻關註基站內的資源分配最優化,沒有將基站選擇問題與基站內資源分配問題相結閤。鑒于此,提齣一種基于效用的多基站協作無線資源分配方法,將無線網絡資源分配劃分為2箇階段,即基于擁塞度選擇基站與基于邊際效用實現基站內的資源分配。倣真實驗結果錶明,在268次基站選擇中,該方法與效用最優的基線方法有218次相同,佔81.3%,但其平均用時隻有0.066 s,遠低于基線方法的0.926 s,從而驗證瞭該基站選擇方法的閤理性,以及基站內資源分配方法的有效性和高效性。
현유기우효용적무선망락자원분배방법대다미고필망락정체효용최우적문제,지관주기참내적자원분배최우화,몰유장기참선택문제여기참내자원분배문제상결합。감우차,제출일충기우효용적다기참협작무선자원분배방법,장무선망락자원분배화분위2개계단,즉기우옹새도선택기참여기우변제효용실현기참내적자원분배。방진실험결과표명,재268차기참선택중,해방법여효용최우적기선방법유218차상동,점81.3%,단기평균용시지유0.066 s,원저우기선방법적0.926 s,종이험증료해기참선택방법적합이성,이급기참내자원분배방법적유효성화고효성。
Most utility based wireless resource allocation methods only focus on the optimal allocation within a base station. Because of ignoring the issue of base station selection, these methods can not achieve the optimal utility of whole network. Therefore, this paper proposes a utility based multi-base-station cooperation wireless resource allocation method, which is divided into two stages. In the first stage, base stations are selected according to their congestion degree. And in the second stage, the resource in each base station is allocated according to marginal utility. The simulation experiments show that, between the approach and the baseline method, of all the 268 base station selections there are 218 accounting for 81.3%having the same selection result and the average elapse time of the proposed method is only 0.066 s, which is much lower than the baseline method 0.926 s. These facts show the rationality of the base station selection method as well as the efficiency and effectiveness of the resource allocation method.