CAJ | 학술논문

目的：观察雾化吸入特布他林治疗支气管哮喘患者的临床效果。方法选取我院120例支气管哮喘患者作为研究对象，随机分为观察组和对照组，各60例。在常规治疗的基础上，对照组给予雾化吸入倍氯米松，观察组在对照组的基础上再给予雾化吸入特布他林，两组患者均治疗7 d。结果治疗后观察组80%的总有效率明显高于对照组的60%，有显著差异（P<0.05）；观察组通气/血流（V/Q）改善情况明显优于对照组（P<0.05）。结论雾化吸入特布他林对于支气管哮喘的治疗效果明显优于常规治疗，值得临床推广。
목적：관찰무화흡입특포타림치료지기관효천환자적림상효과。방법선취아원120례지기관효천환자작위연구대상，수궤분위관찰조화대조조，각60례。재상규치료적기출상，대조조급여무화흡입배록미송，관찰조재대조조적기출상재급여무화흡입특포타림，량조환자균치료7 d。결과치료후관찰조80%적총유효솔명현고우대조조적60%，유현저차이（P<0.05）；관찰조통기/혈류（V/Q）개선정황명현우우대조조（P<0.05）。결론무화흡입특포타림대우지기관효천적치료효과명현우우상규치료，치득림상추엄。
Objective To observe the atomization inhalation terbutaline treatment the clinical effect of bronchial asthma patients. Methods Select 120 cases of bronchial asthma patients as the research object were randomLy divided into observation group and control group, 60 cases each. On the basis of conventional treatment, the control group given atomization inhalation of beclomethasone dipropionate, on the basis of the observation group in the control group to give atomization inhalation terbutaline, treatment for 7 d. Results Treatment group total effective rate of 80%was obviously higher than that of control group 60%, there were significant differences (P<0.05);observation group ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) to improve blood flow condition is better than the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Atomization inhalation terbutaline in the treatment of bronchial asthma effect is superior to conventional treatment, worth clinical promotion.