山东医药
山東醫藥
산동의약
SHANDONG MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
19期
4-7
,共4页
宋莹%仇秦威%贺智敏%谷依学
宋瑩%仇秦威%賀智敏%穀依學
송형%구진위%하지민%곡의학
切除修复交叉互补基因1%RNA干扰%顺铂%肺肿瘤%肺癌
切除脩複交扠互補基因1%RNA榦擾%順鉑%肺腫瘤%肺癌
절제수복교차호보기인1%RNA간우%순박%폐종류%폐암
ERCC1%RNA interference%cDDP%lung cancer
目的:观察顺铂(cDDP)对小分子干扰RNA(siRNA)抑制切除修复交叉互补基因1(ERCC1)基因表达的A549细胞增殖、凋亡影响,并探讨 cDDP对siRNA抑制ERCC1基因表达的A549细胞化疗敏感性。方法根据ERCC1基因序列,设计合成3对特异性的siRNA(分别命名为S1、S2、S3),同时合成阴性对照 siRNA(命名NC)。取对数生长期的A549细胞,采用Lipofectamine2000脂质体转染法进行S1、S2、S3、S1+S2+S3及NC转染,real-time RT-PCR和Western blotting技术检测ERCC1 mRNA和蛋白。结果与NC相比, S1、S2、S3及S1+S2+S3均能下调ERCC1表达,但S1+S2+S3下降最为显著。用NC及S1+S2+S3转染A549细胞,24 h后加入0、0.5、1、2、4、8μg/mL的cDDP,采用 MTS法计算细胞生存率及cDDP对细胞的半数抑制浓度( IC50)。 A549细胞转染后48 h加4μg/mL的cDDP,流式细胞仪检测细胞凋亡率。结果加入0、0.5、1、2、4、8μgm/L 的cDDP,NC转染的 A549细胞存活率分别为100.00%±3.21%、94.86%±7.14%、89.79%±3.29%、66.67%±5.40%、33.31%±1.79%、19.12%±0.41%,S1+S2+S3转染的A549细胞存活率分别为100.0%±6.53%、71.63%±8.23%、59.33%±0.94%、37.42%±1.57%、19.41%±1.41%、12.75%±0.27%,相同cDDP浓度下A549细胞存活率比较,P均<0.05;S1+S2+S3、NC转染细胞的IC50分别为(1.25±0.11)、(3.09±0.36)μg/mL,二者比较,P<0.01。未加cDDP时,NC与S1+S2+S3转染A 549的细胞凋亡率分别为8.06%±1.79%、14.96%±0.47%,加入cDDP后,细胞凋亡率分别为24.61%±1.98%、43.90%±3.01%,二者比较,P均<0.05。结论 cDDP能降低siRNA抑制ERCC1基因表达的A549细胞增殖能力及IC50,并诱导细胞凋亡;cDDP对siRNA抑制ERCC1基因表达的A549细胞化疗敏感性升高。
目的:觀察順鉑(cDDP)對小分子榦擾RNA(siRNA)抑製切除脩複交扠互補基因1(ERCC1)基因錶達的A549細胞增殖、凋亡影響,併探討 cDDP對siRNA抑製ERCC1基因錶達的A549細胞化療敏感性。方法根據ERCC1基因序列,設計閤成3對特異性的siRNA(分彆命名為S1、S2、S3),同時閤成陰性對照 siRNA(命名NC)。取對數生長期的A549細胞,採用Lipofectamine2000脂質體轉染法進行S1、S2、S3、S1+S2+S3及NC轉染,real-time RT-PCR和Western blotting技術檢測ERCC1 mRNA和蛋白。結果與NC相比, S1、S2、S3及S1+S2+S3均能下調ERCC1錶達,但S1+S2+S3下降最為顯著。用NC及S1+S2+S3轉染A549細胞,24 h後加入0、0.5、1、2、4、8μg/mL的cDDP,採用 MTS法計算細胞生存率及cDDP對細胞的半數抑製濃度( IC50)。 A549細胞轉染後48 h加4μg/mL的cDDP,流式細胞儀檢測細胞凋亡率。結果加入0、0.5、1、2、4、8μgm/L 的cDDP,NC轉染的 A549細胞存活率分彆為100.00%±3.21%、94.86%±7.14%、89.79%±3.29%、66.67%±5.40%、33.31%±1.79%、19.12%±0.41%,S1+S2+S3轉染的A549細胞存活率分彆為100.0%±6.53%、71.63%±8.23%、59.33%±0.94%、37.42%±1.57%、19.41%±1.41%、12.75%±0.27%,相同cDDP濃度下A549細胞存活率比較,P均<0.05;S1+S2+S3、NC轉染細胞的IC50分彆為(1.25±0.11)、(3.09±0.36)μg/mL,二者比較,P<0.01。未加cDDP時,NC與S1+S2+S3轉染A 549的細胞凋亡率分彆為8.06%±1.79%、14.96%±0.47%,加入cDDP後,細胞凋亡率分彆為24.61%±1.98%、43.90%±3.01%,二者比較,P均<0.05。結論 cDDP能降低siRNA抑製ERCC1基因錶達的A549細胞增殖能力及IC50,併誘導細胞凋亡;cDDP對siRNA抑製ERCC1基因錶達的A549細胞化療敏感性升高。
목적:관찰순박(cDDP)대소분자간우RNA(siRNA)억제절제수복교차호보기인1(ERCC1)기인표체적A549세포증식、조망영향,병탐토 cDDP대siRNA억제ERCC1기인표체적A549세포화료민감성。방법근거ERCC1기인서렬,설계합성3대특이성적siRNA(분별명명위S1、S2、S3),동시합성음성대조 siRNA(명명NC)。취대수생장기적A549세포,채용Lipofectamine2000지질체전염법진행S1、S2、S3、S1+S2+S3급NC전염,real-time RT-PCR화Western blotting기술검측ERCC1 mRNA화단백。결과여NC상비, S1、S2、S3급S1+S2+S3균능하조ERCC1표체,단S1+S2+S3하강최위현저。용NC급S1+S2+S3전염A549세포,24 h후가입0、0.5、1、2、4、8μg/mL적cDDP,채용 MTS법계산세포생존솔급cDDP대세포적반수억제농도( IC50)。 A549세포전염후48 h가4μg/mL적cDDP,류식세포의검측세포조망솔。결과가입0、0.5、1、2、4、8μgm/L 적cDDP,NC전염적 A549세포존활솔분별위100.00%±3.21%、94.86%±7.14%、89.79%±3.29%、66.67%±5.40%、33.31%±1.79%、19.12%±0.41%,S1+S2+S3전염적A549세포존활솔분별위100.0%±6.53%、71.63%±8.23%、59.33%±0.94%、37.42%±1.57%、19.41%±1.41%、12.75%±0.27%,상동cDDP농도하A549세포존활솔비교,P균<0.05;S1+S2+S3、NC전염세포적IC50분별위(1.25±0.11)、(3.09±0.36)μg/mL,이자비교,P<0.01。미가cDDP시,NC여S1+S2+S3전염A 549적세포조망솔분별위8.06%±1.79%、14.96%±0.47%,가입cDDP후,세포조망솔분별위24.61%±1.98%、43.90%±3.01%,이자비교,P균<0.05。결론 cDDP능강저siRNA억제ERCC1기인표체적A549세포증식능력급IC50,병유도세포조망;cDDP대siRNA억제ERCC1기인표체적A549세포화료민감성승고。
A bstract: Objce tive bjective: To investigate the effection of excision repair cross complementation 1 ( ERCC1) downr-egulated by RNA interference on proliferation and apoptosis in lung cancer A 549 cell line.Furthermore, to study the chemotherapy sensitivity of A549 cells with down-regulation ERCC1 to cisplatin.Methods:The negative control interfering RNA(NC) together with three small interfering RNAs (S1, S2 and S3) targeting ERCC1 gene was designed and synthe-sized.The siRNAs (S 1, S2, S3, S1+S2+S3 and NC) were transfected to A549 cell with lipofectamine 2000, respective-ly.The mRNA and protein expression levels of ERCC 1 were evaluated by real-time RT-PCR and western blot assay .All three siRNAs(S1, S2 and S3) could decrease the expression of ERCC1, but S1+S2+S3 reduced ERCC1 mostly.SiRNAs NC and S1+S2+S3 were transfected into A549 cell in 96 well-plot, the concentration of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8μg/mL cDDP were added 24 hours later , MTS assay was used to measure cell survival rate and cDDP on the cells of the half inhibitory concentration (IC50).4 μg/mL cDDP was added after 48 hours of interfering NC and S1+S2+S3.The apoptosis rate were detected by flow cytometry .Results:At the concentration of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 μg/mL cDDP, the survival rates of A549 cell with NC were 100% ±3.21%, 94.86% ±7.14%, 89.79% ±3.29%, 66.67% ±5.40%, 33.31% ± 1.79%, 19.12% ±0.41%, respectively;While survival rates of A549 cell with S1+S2+S3 were 100% ±6.53%,71.63% ±8.23%, 59.33%? ±0.94%,? 37.42%? ±1.57%, 19.41%? ±? 1.41%, 12.75% ±? 0.27%. The cell survival rate of NC and S1+S2+S3 group has significant difference at the same concentration of cDDP (P <0. 05).The IC50 of S1+S2+S3and NC were (1.25 ±0.11) and (3.09 ±0.36) μg/mL(P<0.01).The cell apoptosis rates of NC and S1+S2+S3 were 8.06%±1.79% and 14.96%±0.47% without cDDP(P<0.05), but the apoptosis rate were 24.61%±1.98% and 43.90%±3.01% with cDDP(P <0.05).Conclusion: Down-regulation ERCC1 by RNAi can enhance the effects of cDDP on promoting apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation of the A 549 cells.The sensitivity of A549 cell to cisplatin can be enhanced by RNA interfering ERCC 1 gene.