中华骨科杂志
中華骨科雜誌
중화골과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS
2014年
3期
306-310
,共5页
田伟%安岩%李加宁%刘亚军%吴昕峰%吕艳伟%曾成
田偉%安巖%李加寧%劉亞軍%吳昕峰%呂豔偉%曾成
전위%안암%리가저%류아군%오흔봉%려염위%증성
颅窝,后%枢椎%延髓%脊髓%体层摄影术,X线计算机%磁共振成像
顱窩,後%樞椎%延髓%脊髓%體層攝影術,X線計算機%磁共振成像
로와,후%추추%연수%척수%체층섭영술,X선계산궤%자공진성상
Cranial fossa,posterior%Axis%Medulla oblongata%Spinal Cord%Tomography,X-ray computed%Magnetic resonance imaging
目的 获取斜坡枢椎角的正常值范围,并探讨其与延髓脊髓角的相关性.方法 2012年4月至2013年6月住院治疗的颈椎CT检查未见颅颈交界区外伤、疾病及先天性畸形的颈椎椎间盘突出症及颈椎管狭窄症患者225例,于CT片上齿突面积最大的平面测量斜坡枢椎角,斜坡枢椎角定义为斜坡平面与枢椎椎体后缘之间的夹角;其中117例行颈椎MR检查,于MRI片上分别测量斜坡枢椎角与延髓脊髓角,延髓脊髓角定义为上颈髓腹侧与延髓腹侧之间的夹角.应用回归分析评价斜坡枢椎角与延髓脊髓角的相关性.影像学测量在计算机数据库中用Pacs测角软件进行,测量精度0.01°.测量工作由两位高年资脊柱外科医生分别独立完成,取均值作为测量结果.结果 225例患者的斜坡枢椎角为133.52°~172.16°,平均156.93°±6.53°;不同性别组间差异有统计学意义,男性斜坡枢椎角的95%置信区间为(145.10°,170.19°),女性斜坡枢椎角的95%置信区间为(142.67°,168.47°);不同年龄组间(30±岁、40±岁、50±岁、60±岁、70±岁)差异无统计学意义;MRI与及CT测量的斜坡枢椎角的差异无统计学意义.117例患者的延髓脊髓角为130.38°~168.75°,平均154.17°±6.54°,95%置信区间为(141.35°.166.99°);不同性别及不同年龄组间差异无统计学意义.斜坡枢椎角与延髓脊髓角存在线性正相关(r=0.95,P=0.007).结论 男性斜坡枢椎角正常值为145.10°~170.19°,女性斜坡枢椎角正常值为142.67°~168.47°;斜坡枢椎角与延髓脊髓角呈正相关,斜坡枢椎角正常范围可作为术中复位的参考.
目的 穫取斜坡樞椎角的正常值範圍,併探討其與延髓脊髓角的相關性.方法 2012年4月至2013年6月住院治療的頸椎CT檢查未見顱頸交界區外傷、疾病及先天性畸形的頸椎椎間盤突齣癥及頸椎管狹窄癥患者225例,于CT片上齒突麵積最大的平麵測量斜坡樞椎角,斜坡樞椎角定義為斜坡平麵與樞椎椎體後緣之間的夾角;其中117例行頸椎MR檢查,于MRI片上分彆測量斜坡樞椎角與延髓脊髓角,延髓脊髓角定義為上頸髓腹側與延髓腹側之間的夾角.應用迴歸分析評價斜坡樞椎角與延髓脊髓角的相關性.影像學測量在計算機數據庫中用Pacs測角軟件進行,測量精度0.01°.測量工作由兩位高年資脊柱外科醫生分彆獨立完成,取均值作為測量結果.結果 225例患者的斜坡樞椎角為133.52°~172.16°,平均156.93°±6.53°;不同性彆組間差異有統計學意義,男性斜坡樞椎角的95%置信區間為(145.10°,170.19°),女性斜坡樞椎角的95%置信區間為(142.67°,168.47°);不同年齡組間(30±歲、40±歲、50±歲、60±歲、70±歲)差異無統計學意義;MRI與及CT測量的斜坡樞椎角的差異無統計學意義.117例患者的延髓脊髓角為130.38°~168.75°,平均154.17°±6.54°,95%置信區間為(141.35°.166.99°);不同性彆及不同年齡組間差異無統計學意義.斜坡樞椎角與延髓脊髓角存在線性正相關(r=0.95,P=0.007).結論 男性斜坡樞椎角正常值為145.10°~170.19°,女性斜坡樞椎角正常值為142.67°~168.47°;斜坡樞椎角與延髓脊髓角呈正相關,斜坡樞椎角正常範圍可作為術中複位的參攷.
목적 획취사파추추각적정상치범위,병탐토기여연수척수각적상관성.방법 2012년4월지2013년6월주원치료적경추CT검사미견로경교계구외상、질병급선천성기형적경추추간반돌출증급경추관협착증환자225례,우CT편상치돌면적최대적평면측량사파추추각,사파추추각정의위사파평면여추추추체후연지간적협각;기중117례행경추MR검사,우MRI편상분별측량사파추추각여연수척수각,연수척수각정의위상경수복측여연수복측지간적협각.응용회귀분석평개사파추추각여연수척수각적상관성.영상학측량재계산궤수거고중용Pacs측각연건진행,측량정도0.01°.측량공작유량위고년자척주외과의생분별독립완성,취균치작위측량결과.결과 225례환자적사파추추각위133.52°~172.16°,평균156.93°±6.53°;불동성별조간차이유통계학의의,남성사파추추각적95%치신구간위(145.10°,170.19°),녀성사파추추각적95%치신구간위(142.67°,168.47°);불동년령조간(30±세、40±세、50±세、60±세、70±세)차이무통계학의의;MRI여급CT측량적사파추추각적차이무통계학의의.117례환자적연수척수각위130.38°~168.75°,평균154.17°±6.54°,95%치신구간위(141.35°.166.99°);불동성별급불동년령조간차이무통계학의의.사파추추각여연수척수각존재선성정상관(r=0.95,P=0.007).결론 남성사파추추각정상치위145.10°~170.19°,녀성사파추추각정상치위142.67°~168.47°;사파추추각여연수척수각정정상관,사파추추각정상범위가작위술중복위적삼고.
Objective To measure the clivus-axial angle (CAA) of Chinese,provide a normal value,and explore the correlation between CAA with cervico-medullary angle (CMA).Methods The CAA was measured on the CT of cervical spine in 225 Chinese with normal cranio-vertebral junction (CVJ).Both the CAA and the CMA were measured on the MRI of cervical spine in 117 subjects.All measurements were performed under a bone window (window level,300 Hu; window width,1 000 Hu) with an accuracy of 0.01°.A regression analysis was used for analyzing the correlation between CAA and CMA.The angle between the clivus plane and the straight line parallel to that of the posterior margin of the C2 vertebral body was defined as CAA; moreover,the angle between the strajght line parallel to the ventral side of the cervical spinal cord and the straight line parallel to that of the ventral side of the medulla oblongata was defined as CMA.Two experienced spinal surgeons performed the measurements.The CAA and CMA were measured three times,and the mean value was considered as the result.Results The CAA of 225 subjects was 133.52°-172.16° (156.93°±6.53°).The 95% confidence interval was 145.10°-170.19° in male and 142.67°-168.47° in female.If the patients were divided into five groups according to their age,a comparison of these groups showed that there were no significant differences among the groups with respect to CAA.It showed that there was consistency between the CAAs measured with MRI and CT.The CMA for 117 patients ranged from 130.38° to 168.75° with a mean value of 154.17°±6.54°,and its 95% confidence interval ranged from 141.35° to 166.99°.If the patients were distributed according to their gender or to their age,there were no significant differences among the groups.The relationship between CAA and CMA was linearity,and the regression coefficient was as high as 0.95 (P=0.007).Conclusion The normal CAA of Chinese is from 133.52° to 172.16°.The 95% confidence interval goes from 145.10° to 170.19° in male,and 142.67° to 168.47° in female,close to CMA.It is valuable for measuring the compression of spinal cord,which can be accessed easily during the procedure.