功能材料
功能材料
공능재료
JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
2014年
1期
1095-1098
,共4页
活性炭%水蒸气%CO2%活化%吸附
活性炭%水蒸氣%CO2%活化%吸附
활성탄%수증기%CO2%활화%흡부
activated carbon%steam%carbon dioxide%activation%adsorption
以煤质炭化料为原料,分别以水蒸气和 CO 2为活化介质制备出微孔结构发达的活性炭.利用 N2吸-脱附等温线、碘吸附值、亚甲基蓝吸附值、CO 2吸附容量、CO 2解吸率和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对其进行表征.结果表明,在实验室条件下,水蒸气法和 CO 2法制备样品的孔径均以0.5~1.0 nm 的微孔为主,在同等条件下,CO 2法制备样品0.5~1.0 nm 范围的微孔含量要比水蒸气法制备样品多10%以上.同时水蒸气法制备样品的中孔分布范围为2.0~3.0 nm,CO 2法制备样品中孔分布范围为2.0~2.5 nm.在同等实验条件下,水蒸气活化制备出活性炭比 CO 2的孔径分布更广,活性炭的亚甲基蓝吸附值、碘吸附值及 CO 2解吸率更高,而 CO 2法制备出的样品对 CO 2的吸附容量更大.
以煤質炭化料為原料,分彆以水蒸氣和 CO 2為活化介質製備齣微孔結構髮達的活性炭.利用 N2吸-脫附等溫線、碘吸附值、亞甲基藍吸附值、CO 2吸附容量、CO 2解吸率和掃描電子顯微鏡(SEM)對其進行錶徵.結果錶明,在實驗室條件下,水蒸氣法和 CO 2法製備樣品的孔徑均以0.5~1.0 nm 的微孔為主,在同等條件下,CO 2法製備樣品0.5~1.0 nm 範圍的微孔含量要比水蒸氣法製備樣品多10%以上.同時水蒸氣法製備樣品的中孔分佈範圍為2.0~3.0 nm,CO 2法製備樣品中孔分佈範圍為2.0~2.5 nm.在同等實驗條件下,水蒸氣活化製備齣活性炭比 CO 2的孔徑分佈更廣,活性炭的亞甲基藍吸附值、碘吸附值及 CO 2解吸率更高,而 CO 2法製備齣的樣品對 CO 2的吸附容量更大.
이매질탄화료위원료,분별이수증기화 CO 2위활화개질제비출미공결구발체적활성탄.이용 N2흡-탈부등온선、전흡부치、아갑기람흡부치、CO 2흡부용량、CO 2해흡솔화소묘전자현미경(SEM)대기진행표정.결과표명,재실험실조건하,수증기법화 CO 2법제비양품적공경균이0.5~1.0 nm 적미공위주,재동등조건하,CO 2법제비양품0.5~1.0 nm 범위적미공함량요비수증기법제비양품다10%이상.동시수증기법제비양품적중공분포범위위2.0~3.0 nm,CO 2법제비양품중공분포범위위2.0~2.5 nm.재동등실험조건하,수증기활화제비출활성탄비 CO 2적공경분포경엄,활성탄적아갑기람흡부치、전흡부치급 CO 2해흡솔경고,이 CO 2법제비출적양품대 CO 2적흡부용량경대.
Developed microporous activated carbons were prepared from carbonized coal by using steam activation and CO 2 activation.The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms,iodine value,methylene blue value,CO 2 adsorp-tion capacity,CO 2 desorption value and SEM were applied to characterize the activated carbons.The results showed that the main pore of activated carbons distributed in the range of 0.5-1.0 nm by using steam activation and CO 2 activation.In the same experiment condition,the pore content in the range of 0.5-1.0 nm obtained by CO 2 activation were 10% more than by steam activation,while the mesopore of activated carbons by using steam and CO 2 activation respectively distributed in the range of 2.0-3.0 nm and 2.0-2.5 nm.The methylene blue value,iodine value and CO 2 desorption value of activated carbons by using steam activation were higher than ac-tivated carbons by using CO 2 activation,but the CO 2 adsorption capacity of activated carbons by using CO 2 acti-vation were higher than activated carbons by using steam activation.