实用肝脏病杂志
實用肝髒病雜誌
실용간장병잡지
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HEPATOLOGY
2014年
2期
136-140
,共5页
郝书理%李保森%孙颖%常彬霞%滕光菊%赵军%张伟%邹正升
郝書理%李保森%孫穎%常彬霞%滕光菊%趙軍%張偉%鄒正升
학서리%리보삼%손영%상빈하%등광국%조군%장위%추정승
酒精性肝衰竭%临床特点%预后因素%感染
酒精性肝衰竭%臨床特點%預後因素%感染
주정성간쇠갈%림상특점%예후인소%감염
Alcoholic liver failure%Clinical features%Prognosis%Infection
目的:分析酒精性肝衰竭患者临床特点及预后影响因素。方法回顾性分析2004年1月至2013年5月住解放军第302医院的资料完整的130例酒精性肝衰竭患者的临床特点及预后影响因素。结果酒精性肝衰竭患者的诱发因素为感染(52.3%)、短期过度饮酒(8.5%)、疲劳(3.8%)、情绪激动(0.8%),另有34.6%原因不明;酒精性肝衰竭患者治愈或好转率为41.5%,无效率为42.3%,死亡率为16.1%,其中死亡前4位的原因分别为肝性脑病和脑水肿或脑疝(33.3%)、感染性休克(28.6%)、失血性休克(23.8%)和肝肾综合征(9.5%);无效或死亡患者脑水肿、脑疝和肝肾综合征的发生率分别为14%、7%和36%,显著高于治愈或好转患者[分别为1%、1%和6%,P 均<0.01)];无效或死亡患者血红蛋白水平[(85.0±28.3) g/L]显著低于治愈或好转组[(95.2±27.6)g/L,P<0.05)];无效或死亡患者 Maddrey 判别函数、MELD 评分和 Glasgow 评分分别为(94.56±63.17)、(25.52±8.29)和(9.76±1.04),均显著高于治愈或好转患者[分别为(68.24±24.61)、(19.03±10.13)和(9.30±1.11),P 均<0.01)];凝血酶原时间(r=-0.19, P=0.03)、国际标准化比值(r=-0.21,P=0.02)、尿素氮(r=-0.28,P=0.01)和肌酐(r=-0.28,P=0.01)水平与预后均呈负相关关系(P<0.05或 P<0.01),患者出现脑水肿(r=-0.26,P=0.01)、脑疝(r=-0.26,P=0.01)和肝肾综合征(r=-0.38, P=0.01)均与预后呈负相关(P<0.01)。结论酒精性肝衰竭的常见诱发因素为感染和短期过量饮酒,凝血功能、肾功能和脑功能障碍是预后不良的重要预测因素。
目的:分析酒精性肝衰竭患者臨床特點及預後影響因素。方法迴顧性分析2004年1月至2013年5月住解放軍第302醫院的資料完整的130例酒精性肝衰竭患者的臨床特點及預後影響因素。結果酒精性肝衰竭患者的誘髮因素為感染(52.3%)、短期過度飲酒(8.5%)、疲勞(3.8%)、情緒激動(0.8%),另有34.6%原因不明;酒精性肝衰竭患者治愈或好轉率為41.5%,無效率為42.3%,死亡率為16.1%,其中死亡前4位的原因分彆為肝性腦病和腦水腫或腦疝(33.3%)、感染性休剋(28.6%)、失血性休剋(23.8%)和肝腎綜閤徵(9.5%);無效或死亡患者腦水腫、腦疝和肝腎綜閤徵的髮生率分彆為14%、7%和36%,顯著高于治愈或好轉患者[分彆為1%、1%和6%,P 均<0.01)];無效或死亡患者血紅蛋白水平[(85.0±28.3) g/L]顯著低于治愈或好轉組[(95.2±27.6)g/L,P<0.05)];無效或死亡患者 Maddrey 判彆函數、MELD 評分和 Glasgow 評分分彆為(94.56±63.17)、(25.52±8.29)和(9.76±1.04),均顯著高于治愈或好轉患者[分彆為(68.24±24.61)、(19.03±10.13)和(9.30±1.11),P 均<0.01)];凝血酶原時間(r=-0.19, P=0.03)、國際標準化比值(r=-0.21,P=0.02)、尿素氮(r=-0.28,P=0.01)和肌酐(r=-0.28,P=0.01)水平與預後均呈負相關關繫(P<0.05或 P<0.01),患者齣現腦水腫(r=-0.26,P=0.01)、腦疝(r=-0.26,P=0.01)和肝腎綜閤徵(r=-0.38, P=0.01)均與預後呈負相關(P<0.01)。結論酒精性肝衰竭的常見誘髮因素為感染和短期過量飲酒,凝血功能、腎功能和腦功能障礙是預後不良的重要預測因素。
목적:분석주정성간쇠갈환자림상특점급예후영향인소。방법회고성분석2004년1월지2013년5월주해방군제302의원적자료완정적130례주정성간쇠갈환자적림상특점급예후영향인소。결과주정성간쇠갈환자적유발인소위감염(52.3%)、단기과도음주(8.5%)、피로(3.8%)、정서격동(0.8%),령유34.6%원인불명;주정성간쇠갈환자치유혹호전솔위41.5%,무효솔위42.3%,사망솔위16.1%,기중사망전4위적원인분별위간성뇌병화뇌수종혹뇌산(33.3%)、감염성휴극(28.6%)、실혈성휴극(23.8%)화간신종합정(9.5%);무효혹사망환자뇌수종、뇌산화간신종합정적발생솔분별위14%、7%화36%,현저고우치유혹호전환자[분별위1%、1%화6%,P 균<0.01)];무효혹사망환자혈홍단백수평[(85.0±28.3) g/L]현저저우치유혹호전조[(95.2±27.6)g/L,P<0.05)];무효혹사망환자 Maddrey 판별함수、MELD 평분화 Glasgow 평분분별위(94.56±63.17)、(25.52±8.29)화(9.76±1.04),균현저고우치유혹호전환자[분별위(68.24±24.61)、(19.03±10.13)화(9.30±1.11),P 균<0.01)];응혈매원시간(r=-0.19, P=0.03)、국제표준화비치(r=-0.21,P=0.02)、뇨소담(r=-0.28,P=0.01)화기항(r=-0.28,P=0.01)수평여예후균정부상관관계(P<0.05혹 P<0.01),환자출현뇌수종(r=-0.26,P=0.01)、뇌산(r=-0.26,P=0.01)화간신종합정(r=-0.38, P=0.01)균여예후정부상관(P<0.01)。결론주정성간쇠갈적상견유발인소위감염화단기과량음주,응혈공능、신공능화뇌공능장애시예후불량적중요예측인소。
Objective To investigate the clinical features and prognosis of patients with alcoholic liver fail-ure. Methods The clinical features and prognosis in 130 patients with alcoholic liver failure who had admitted to Beijing 302nd Hospital of PLA from January 2004 to May 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Results The precipitating factors of patients with alcoholic liver failure were concurrent infection (52.3%),short-term excessive drinking(8.5%),fatigue(3.8%),emotional change(0.8%) and unknown cause(34.6%); The curative or improve-ment rate of patients with alcoholic liver failure was 41.5%,the nonresponsive to treatment was 42.3%,and the mortality rate was 16.2%;Hepatic encephalopathy and cerebral edema or cerebral hernia (33.3%),septic shock (28.6%),hemorrhagic shock(23.8%) and hepatorenal syndrome(9.5%) were the top four causes of death;The in-cidence of cerebral edema,cerebral hernia,hepatorenal syndrome in nonresponsive or death patients were 14%,7%and 36% respectively,significantly higher than those in improved patients (1%,1% and 6%,respectively,P<0.01);The blood hemoglobin levels in nonresponsive or death patients [(85.0± 28.3)g/L]was significantly lower than that in improved patients [(95.2 ±27.6) g/L,P <0.05];The Maddrey's discriminant function,MELD score and Glasgow score in nonresponsive or death patients were(94.56±63.17),(25.52±8.29)and(9.76±1.04),respectively,significantly higher than those in improved patients [(68.24±24.61),(19.03±10.13)and (9.30±1.11),P<0.01];Prothrombin time (r=-0.19,P=0.03),international normalized ratio(r=-0.21,P=0.02),blood urea nitrogen(r=-0.28,P=0.01) and cre-atinine(r=-0.28,P=0.01) were negatively correlated with the prognosis of patients(P<0.05 or P<0.01);Patients with cerebral edema (r=-0.26,P=0.01),cerebral hernia (r=-0.26,P=0.01) and hepatorenal syndrome (r=-0.38,P=0.01)were negatively correlated with the prognosis(P<0.01). Conclusions The common precipitating factors of patients with alcoholic liver failure are concurrent infection and short-term excessive drinking. Coagulation, kidney and brain dysfunction are important predictors for poor prognosis.