CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较4种清洗方法清洗人工流产器械的清洗合格率。方法：将使用后的妇科器械随机分为4组，每组4736件：A组用传统方法流动水下冲洗后浸泡2分钟改进为在纯水+多酶洗液浸泡15小时后，用牙刷刷洗后手工清洗漂洗、终末漂洗、高压水枪冲洗、高压气枪干燥；B组在A组基础上用牙刷刷洗后用新华Rapid-α-520快速式全自动清洗消毒器清洗；C组用QX2000超声清洗机清洗；D组在A组基础上用牙刷刷洗后用QX2000超声清洗机清洗。结果：妇科器械清洗合格率D组均高于其他3组。其中D组与A组相比，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；D组与B组、C组相比，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），B组、C组与A组相比，差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论：第4种清洗方法较其他方法清洗干净，合格率高。
목적：비교4충청세방법청세인공유산기계적청세합격솔。방법：장사용후적부과기계수궤분위4조，매조4736건：A조용전통방법류동수하충세후침포2분종개진위재순수+다매세액침포15소시후，용아쇄쇄세후수공청세표세、종말표세、고압수창충세、고압기창간조；B조재A조기출상용아쇄쇄세후용신화Rapid-α-520쾌속식전자동청세소독기청세；C조용QX2000초성청세궤청세；D조재A조기출상용아쇄쇄세후용QX2000초성청세궤청세。결과：부과기계청세합격솔D조균고우기타3조。기중D조여A조상비，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）；D조여B조、C조상비，차이무통계학의의（P＞0.05），B조、C조여A조상비，차이무통계학의의（P＞0.05）。결론：제4충청세방법교기타방법청세간정，합격솔고。
Objective:To compare the passing rate of four kinds of cleaning methods used to wash artificial abortion instruments. Methods:The used gynecological instruments could be divided into four groups, 4 736 pieces each group. Group A:traditional method of washing with running water and dipped in two minutes were improved:dipped in the water and multi-enzyme lotion for 15 hours, washing and rinsing by hand after washing out with the toothbrush, terminal rinse, flushing with high-pressure water jet, drying with high-pressure air rifle;on the founda-tion of group A, group B were washed with toothbrush, and cleaned with XinHua Rapid-α-520 rapid automatic ster-ilizer;group C were cleaned with QX2000 ultrasonic washer;group D were cleaned with QX2000 ultrasonic washer after washed with toothbrush. Results:Group D was higher than other three groups in passing rate of gynecological instruments cleaning, the difference showed statistical meaning when group D was compared with group A (P<0.05); the difference demonstrated no statistical meaning when group D was compared with group B and C (P>0.05), the dif-ference presented no statistical meaning when group B and C was compared with group A (P>0.05). Conclusion:The fourth method is cleaner than other methods with higher pass rate.