中国肿瘤临床
中國腫瘤臨床
중국종류림상
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
2014年
2期
119-122
,共4页
杨冉%韩金利%张卫民%侯建彬%范献生%史可峰%郑晓东%朱鹏志
楊冉%韓金利%張衛民%侯建彬%範獻生%史可峰%鄭曉東%硃鵬誌
양염%한금리%장위민%후건빈%범헌생%사가봉%정효동%주붕지
癌%食管%新辅助%化疗%手术治疗
癌%食管%新輔助%化療%手術治療
암%식관%신보조%화료%수술치료
neoplasma%esophagus%neoadjuvant%chemotherapy%surgical treatment
目的:探讨新辅助化疗在进展期食管癌治疗中的意义。方法:回顾性研究272例进展期食管癌患者,其中112例行新辅助化疗+手术治疗,160例行单纯手术治疗,比较围手术期并发症发生率、手术切除率及术后生存期。结果:新辅助化疗组术后并发症发生率为34.8%(39/112),单纯手术组术为29.4%(47/160),P=0.50;两组5年生存率分别为:35.7%和29.4%,P<0.05。化疗效果PR组和SD/PD组5年生存率分别为38.5%和30.1%,P<0.01。结论:新辅助化疗未增加食管癌患者围手术期并发症的发生率,是安全可行的;新辅助化疗能提高进展期食管癌患者的生存率;化疗有效组患者预后好于化疗无效组。
目的:探討新輔助化療在進展期食管癌治療中的意義。方法:迴顧性研究272例進展期食管癌患者,其中112例行新輔助化療+手術治療,160例行單純手術治療,比較圍手術期併髮癥髮生率、手術切除率及術後生存期。結果:新輔助化療組術後併髮癥髮生率為34.8%(39/112),單純手術組術為29.4%(47/160),P=0.50;兩組5年生存率分彆為:35.7%和29.4%,P<0.05。化療效果PR組和SD/PD組5年生存率分彆為38.5%和30.1%,P<0.01。結論:新輔助化療未增加食管癌患者圍手術期併髮癥的髮生率,是安全可行的;新輔助化療能提高進展期食管癌患者的生存率;化療有效組患者預後好于化療無效組。
목적:탐토신보조화료재진전기식관암치료중적의의。방법:회고성연구272례진전기식관암환자,기중112례행신보조화료+수술치료,160례행단순수술치료,비교위수술기병발증발생솔、수술절제솔급술후생존기。결과:신보조화료조술후병발증발생솔위34.8%(39/112),단순수술조술위29.4%(47/160),P=0.50;량조5년생존솔분별위:35.7%화29.4%,P<0.05。화료효과PR조화SD/PD조5년생존솔분별위38.5%화30.1%,P<0.01。결론:신보조화료미증가식관암환자위수술기병발증적발생솔,시안전가행적;신보조화료능제고진전기식관암환자적생존솔;화료유효조환자예후호우화료무효조。
Objective: To discuss the significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in the treatment of local advanced esophageal cancer. Methods:A total of 272 cases of local advanced esophageal cancer were studied in retrospect. Out of the 272 cases, 112 were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (CT-S), whereas the remaining 160 cases underwent surgical treatment (S) only. Complications and survival state after surgery were compared. Results: The rate of complications after surgery was as follows: CT-S: 34.8% (39/112); S: 29.4% (47/160), P=0.50. The five-year survival rate was 35.7% and 29.4%, respectively, P<0.05. The CT-S patients were divided into partial remission (PR) and stable disease (SD)/progressive disease (PD) groups according to the effect of the chemotherapy. The five-year survival rate was 38.5% and 30.1%, respectively, P<0.01. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is available for local advanced esophageal cancer. Postoperative complications are not increased by chemotherapy, and the survival rate for local advanced esophageal cancer is improved by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PR has better prognosis compared with SD/PD.