中国医学创新
中國醫學創新
중국의학창신
MEDICAL INNOVATION OF CHINA
2013年
32期
120-121,122
,共3页
磁性附着体%口腔修复%义齿%临床效果分析
磁性附著體%口腔脩複%義齒%臨床效果分析
자성부착체%구강수복%의치%림상효과분석
Magnetic attachment%Prosthesis%Denture%Clinical effect analysis
目的：探讨磁性附着体在口腔修复中的临床应用效果。方法：随机选取本院在2009年5月-2013年2月进行牙列缺损覆盖义齿修复的120例患者，分别对其进行磁性附着体修复前、修复后即刻、修复后6周测定固定力、咀嚼效率的统计学分析。结果：磁性附着体修复后即刻的固定力以及咀嚼效率明显高于磁性附着体修复前，差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。磁性附着体修复后6周与修复后即刻的固定力以及咀嚼效率比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；120例患者出现不良反应2例，不良反应发生率为1.67%。结论：磁性附着体口腔修复外形美观，固定力好，患者咀嚼效率较高，不良反应明显较传统的口腔修复方法少，值得临床应用推广。
目的：探討磁性附著體在口腔脩複中的臨床應用效果。方法：隨機選取本院在2009年5月-2013年2月進行牙列缺損覆蓋義齒脩複的120例患者，分彆對其進行磁性附著體脩複前、脩複後即刻、脩複後6週測定固定力、咀嚼效率的統計學分析。結果：磁性附著體脩複後即刻的固定力以及咀嚼效率明顯高于磁性附著體脩複前，差異均有統計學意義（P<0.05）。磁性附著體脩複後6週與脩複後即刻的固定力以及咀嚼效率比較差異無統計學意義（P>0.05）；120例患者齣現不良反應2例，不良反應髮生率為1.67%。結論：磁性附著體口腔脩複外形美觀，固定力好，患者咀嚼效率較高，不良反應明顯較傳統的口腔脩複方法少，值得臨床應用推廣。
목적：탐토자성부착체재구강수복중적림상응용효과。방법：수궤선취본원재2009년5월-2013년2월진행아렬결손복개의치수복적120례환자，분별대기진행자성부착체수복전、수복후즉각、수복후6주측정고정력、저작효솔적통계학분석。결과：자성부착체수복후즉각적고정력이급저작효솔명현고우자성부착체수복전，차이균유통계학의의（P<0.05）。자성부착체수복후6주여수복후즉각적고정력이급저작효솔비교차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）；120례환자출현불량반응2례，불량반응발생솔위1.67%。결론：자성부착체구강수복외형미관，고정력호，환자저작효솔교고，불량반응명현교전통적구강수복방법소，치득림상응용추엄。
Objective:To explore the clinical effect of magnetic attachment in oral cavity repair.Method:One hundred and twenty patients who received dentition defect cover denture in our hospital from May 2009 to February 2013,respectively carried on the statistical analysis of the magnetic attachment repair before,immediately after repair,repair after 6 weeks to determine the fixed force and masticatory efficiency.Result:Fixed force immediately after the restoration of magnetic attachment and masticatory efficiency were significantly higher than that of magnetic attachment before restoration,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Magnetic attachment 6 weeks after repair and repair immediately after fixing force and masticatory efficiency comparison,no significant difference(P>0.05).One hundred and twenty patients had adverse the reaction of 2 patients,the incidence of adverse reaction was 1.67%.Conclusion:Dental magnetic attachment body appearance,fixing force,masticatory efficiency is higher, adverse reactions than traditional oral repair method of less,worthy of clinical application.
