CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨磁性附着体在口腔修复中的应用效果。方法：选取2009-2012年应用磁性附着物进行口腔修复的患者78例，并对其临床资料进行对比分析。结果：在粘固前后固定力及咀嚼率的测定上，粘固后14 d相比粘固前差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），粘固后21 d相比粘固前差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），而粘固后21 d相比粘固后14 d差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；另外，本组患者对粘固后舒适度、外观及语音的满意度相比粘固前差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：磁性附着体应用于口腔修复效果好，值得推广。
목적：탐토자성부착체재구강수복중적응용효과。방법：선취2009-2012년응용자성부착물진행구강수복적환자78례，병대기림상자료진행대비분석。결과：재점고전후고정력급저작솔적측정상，점고후14 d상비점고전차이유통계학의의（P<0.05），점고후21 d상비점고전차이유통계학의의（P<0.05），이점고후21 d상비점고후14 d차이무통계학의의（P>0.05）；령외，본조환자대점고후서괄도、외관급어음적만의도상비점고전차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론：자성부착체응용우구강수복효과호，치득추엄。
Objective:To explore the application effect of magnetic attachment in oral cavity repair. Method:78 cases were used magnetic attachments for oral cavity in 2009-2012,and their clinical data were analyzed.Result:Fixed force and masticatory rate before,during,and after the cementation on the determination of 14 days after the cementation cement was compared before the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05), compared to 21 days after the cementation cement before the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05),whereas the cementation than 21 days after 14 days after the cementation difference reached statistical significance(P>0.05).In addition,this group of patients after the cementation of comfort, appearance and voice satisfaction than before cement was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion:The magnetic attachment application and oral repair effect is good,is worth promoting.