浙江中医药大学学报
浙江中醫藥大學學報
절강중의약대학학보
JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
3期
283-286
,共4页
慢性呼吸系统疾病%冬病夏治%中药%穴位敷贴%耳穴按压
慢性呼吸繫統疾病%鼕病夏治%中藥%穴位敷貼%耳穴按壓
만성호흡계통질병%동병하치%중약%혈위부첩%이혈안압
chronic respiratory diseases%treating winter diseases in summer%traditional Chinese medicine%acupoint application%auricular acupressure
[目的]对比“冬病夏治”单一疗法和综合疗法治疗慢性呼吸系统疾病的疗效。[方法]478例支气管哮喘、慢性支气管炎、慢性咽喉炎、过敏性鼻炎、慢支伴肺气肿的患者,在“三伏天”以中药内服、外用穴位敷贴及耳穴按压相结合的综合疗法和单一使用穴位敷贴的单一疗法疗效做对比,并作随访观察,最后对随访结果进行分析。[结果]慢性呼吸系统疾病患者采用“冬病夏治”综合疗法治疗,较单一治疗明显改善,两组疗效比较有统计学差异(P<0.05),特别是针对支气管哮喘、慢性支气管炎、慢性咽喉炎、过敏性鼻炎的治疗,综合疗法组较单一疗法组明显改善,两组间比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)。[结论]“冬病夏治”综合疗法控制和治疗慢性呼吸系统疾病效果明显。
[目的]對比“鼕病夏治”單一療法和綜閤療法治療慢性呼吸繫統疾病的療效。[方法]478例支氣管哮喘、慢性支氣管炎、慢性嚥喉炎、過敏性鼻炎、慢支伴肺氣腫的患者,在“三伏天”以中藥內服、外用穴位敷貼及耳穴按壓相結閤的綜閤療法和單一使用穴位敷貼的單一療法療效做對比,併作隨訪觀察,最後對隨訪結果進行分析。[結果]慢性呼吸繫統疾病患者採用“鼕病夏治”綜閤療法治療,較單一治療明顯改善,兩組療效比較有統計學差異(P<0.05),特彆是針對支氣管哮喘、慢性支氣管炎、慢性嚥喉炎、過敏性鼻炎的治療,綜閤療法組較單一療法組明顯改善,兩組間比較有統計學意義(P<0.05)。[結論]“鼕病夏治”綜閤療法控製和治療慢性呼吸繫統疾病效果明顯。
[목적]대비“동병하치”단일요법화종합요법치료만성호흡계통질병적료효。[방법]478례지기관효천、만성지기관염、만성인후염、과민성비염、만지반폐기종적환자,재“삼복천”이중약내복、외용혈위부첩급이혈안압상결합적종합요법화단일사용혈위부첩적단일요법료효주대비,병작수방관찰,최후대수방결과진행분석。[결과]만성호흡계통질병환자채용“동병하치”종합요법치료,교단일치료명현개선,량조료효비교유통계학차이(P<0.05),특별시침대지기관효천、만성지기관염、만성인후염、과민성비염적치료,종합요법조교단일요법조명현개선,량조간비교유통계학의의(P<0.05)。[결론]“동병하치”종합요법공제화치료만성호흡계통질병효과명현。
[Objective] To compare mono-therapy with combination therapy in treating winter diseases in summer. [Methods] Choose 478 chronic respiratory disease patients applied combination therapy or mono-therapy. Combination therapy refers to a method combining drug therapy,acupoint application, and otopoint massage. Mono-therapy refers to a method using point application alone. Then compare the effects of each group, and make fol ow-up observation. [Results] In treating winter diseases in summer, the combination therapy improved obviously for the patients with chronic respireatory diseases. There was significant differences( P<0.05) between the two groups. Especial y for bronchial asthma, chronic bronchitis, chronic laryngitis, al ergic rhinitis, the efficacy of combination therapy was better than the mono-therapy, and there was significant difference( P<0.05) between the two groups.[Conclusions] The therapeutic effect of combination therapy is superior than the mono-therapy in treating and control ing chronic respiratory diseases.