CAJ | 학술논문

学者们已经从经济学或社会学或系统学或文化学等视角界定和诠释旅游吸引物的概念，但遗憾的是并没有学者从法学的视角界定和诠释旅游吸引物和旅游吸引物权的概念；虽然保继刚、左冰和张琼、张德淼探讨了旅游吸引物权的立法问题，但是由于学科思维的差异，由于对旅游吸引物权的认识不够，所以对于“旅游吸引物权的立法”的观点相左，其两者的观点都不令人诚服。追根溯源，在吸收旅游学者对旅游吸引物研究成果的基础上，应该从法学视角探讨旅游吸引物，反思和检讨旅游吸引物权的表达与实践。
학자문이경종경제학혹사회학혹계통학혹문화학등시각계정화전석여유흡인물적개념，단유감적시병몰유학자종법학적시각계정화전석여유흡인물화여유흡인물권적개념；수연보계강、좌빙화장경、장덕묘탐토료여유흡인물권적입법문제，단시유우학과사유적차이，유우대여유흡인물권적인식불구，소이대우“여유흡인물권적입법”적관점상좌，기량자적관점도불령인성복。추근소원，재흡수여유학자대여유흡인물연구성과적기출상，응해종법학시각탐토여유흡인물，반사화검토여유흡인물권적표체여실천。
Although some scholars have tried to define or interpret the concept of tourist attractions in the perspectives of economics,sociology,systematics and cultural studies,no scholars have define or interpret the concept of tourist attractions and the related rights in the legal perspective.Although such scholars as Bao Jigang,Zuo Bing,Zhang Qiong and Zhang De have studied the legislative prob-lems concerning the ownership of tourist attractions,they are different in thinking and understanding, and have different conclusions which do not hold water.Thus,the future studies on tourist attractions should adopt the legal perspective and focus on the expression and practice of the ownership of tourist attractions.