中国循证心血管医学杂志
中國循證心血管醫學雜誌
중국순증심혈관의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASES CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
2013年
5期
476-478
,共3页
郭翔云%康国平%李果%吴龙飞
郭翔雲%康國平%李果%吳龍飛
곽상운%강국평%리과%오룡비
心肺复苏%指南%心源性猝死%自主循环
心肺複囌%指南%心源性猝死%自主循環
심폐복소%지남%심원성졸사%자주순배
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation%Guideline%Sudden cardiac death%Spontaneous circulation
目的:比较2005年旧版心肺复苏(CPR)指南和2010年新版CPR指南指导下院外心源性猝死(SCA)的抢救效果。方法纳入2008年7月~2010年9月在旧版CRP指导下进行院外CRP抢救的SCA患者248例作为旧指南组,2011年1月~2013年3月在新版CRP指导下抢救的SCA患者282例作为新指南组,比较两组SCA患者经CPR抢救后的自主循环恢复率、1个月存活率以及1个月后无脑功能受损的存活率。结果与旧指南组比较,新指南组自主循环恢复率明显增加(12.77%vs.7.66%,P=0.045),其中SCA发作至接受CPR的时间≤10 min的患者中,新指南组自主循环恢复率明显高于旧指南组(36.23%vs.19.35%, P=0.032);而超过10 min接受CPR的患者之间自主循环恢复率无差异(5.16%vs.3.76%,P=0.501)。新指南组1个月后存活率以及存活且无脑功能受损的患者比例均高于旧指南组,但差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论新版CPR指南较旧版指南抢救SCA患者成功率更高,同时还可提高患者无脑功能受损的存活率。
目的:比較2005年舊版心肺複囌(CPR)指南和2010年新版CPR指南指導下院外心源性猝死(SCA)的搶救效果。方法納入2008年7月~2010年9月在舊版CRP指導下進行院外CRP搶救的SCA患者248例作為舊指南組,2011年1月~2013年3月在新版CRP指導下搶救的SCA患者282例作為新指南組,比較兩組SCA患者經CPR搶救後的自主循環恢複率、1箇月存活率以及1箇月後無腦功能受損的存活率。結果與舊指南組比較,新指南組自主循環恢複率明顯增加(12.77%vs.7.66%,P=0.045),其中SCA髮作至接受CPR的時間≤10 min的患者中,新指南組自主循環恢複率明顯高于舊指南組(36.23%vs.19.35%, P=0.032);而超過10 min接受CPR的患者之間自主循環恢複率無差異(5.16%vs.3.76%,P=0.501)。新指南組1箇月後存活率以及存活且無腦功能受損的患者比例均高于舊指南組,但差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論新版CPR指南較舊版指南搶救SCA患者成功率更高,同時還可提高患者無腦功能受損的存活率。
목적:비교2005년구판심폐복소(CPR)지남화2010년신판CPR지남지도하원외심원성졸사(SCA)적창구효과。방법납입2008년7월~2010년9월재구판CRP지도하진행원외CRP창구적SCA환자248례작위구지남조,2011년1월~2013년3월재신판CRP지도하창구적SCA환자282례작위신지남조,비교량조SCA환자경CPR창구후적자주순배회복솔、1개월존활솔이급1개월후무뇌공능수손적존활솔。결과여구지남조비교,신지남조자주순배회복솔명현증가(12.77%vs.7.66%,P=0.045),기중SCA발작지접수CPR적시간≤10 min적환자중,신지남조자주순배회복솔명현고우구지남조(36.23%vs.19.35%, P=0.032);이초과10 min접수CPR적환자지간자주순배회복솔무차이(5.16%vs.3.76%,P=0.501)。신지남조1개월후존활솔이급존활차무뇌공능수손적환자비례균고우구지남조,단차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론신판CPR지남교구판지남창구SCA환자성공솔경고,동시환가제고환자무뇌공능수손적존활솔。
Objective To compare the rescue results of out-of-hospital (OOH) sudden cardiac death (SCD) guided by 2005 AHA CPR Guideline and 2010 AHA CPR Guideline. Methods The patients (n=248) with OOH CPR rescue guided by 2005 AHA CPR Guideline were chosen from July, 2008 to Sept. 2010 as 2005 group, and the patients (n=282) with OOH CPR rescue guided by 2010 AHA CPR Guideline were chosen from Jan. 2011 to Mar. 2013as 2010 group. The recovery rate of spontaneous circulation, one-month survival rate and survival rate without cerebral injury after one month were compared between two groups. Results Compared with 2005 group, the recovery rate of spontaneous circulation increased significantly in 2010 group (12.77% vs. 7.66%, P=0.045). Among the patients accepted CPR within 10 minutes after SCD attack, the recovery rate of spontaneous circulation was significantly higher in 2010 group than that in 2005 group (36.23%vs. 19.35%, P=0.032), while among those accepted CPR after 10 minutes, the recovery rate of spontaneous circulation had no difference between two groups (5.16%vs. 3.76%, P=0.501). The proportion of one-month survival rate and survival rate without cerebral injury after one month were all higher in 2010 group than those in 2005 group but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion The success rate of rescuing SCD patients guided by 2010 AHA CPR Guideline is higher, and at the same time the survival rate of the patients without cerebral injury is improved.