中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
12期
7-8
,共2页
复合小梁切除术%可调整缝线术%青光眼%临床疗效
複閤小樑切除術%可調整縫線術%青光眼%臨床療效
복합소량절제술%가조정봉선술%청광안%림상료효
Complex trabeculectomy%Adjustable suture%Glaucoma%Clinical curative effect
目的：探讨分析对复合小梁切除术联合可调整缝线术治疗青光眼的临床疗效。方法选取在该院接受治疗的青光眼患者82例，将其平均分为实验组和对照组，每组41例，对照组患者采用复合小梁切除术对患者进行治疗，实验组患者在应用复合小梁切除术治疗的基础上给予可调整缝线术进行治疗，对比分析两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果两组患者经治疗后，实验组患者的总有效率（92.67%）明显高于对照组患者的总有效率（56.09%），差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。与此同时，实验组患者的平均眼压为（35.42±3.69）mmHg，对照组患者的平均眼压为（34.08±3.19）mmHg，实验组术后并发症的发生率为（4.87%）明显低于对照组患者治疗后的术后并发症发生率为（29.27%），差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论复合小梁切除术联合可调整缝线术治疗青光眼的临床疗效较仅应用复合小梁切除术治疗青光眼的临床疗效显著，安全可靠，可以在临床上广泛应用。
目的：探討分析對複閤小樑切除術聯閤可調整縫線術治療青光眼的臨床療效。方法選取在該院接受治療的青光眼患者82例，將其平均分為實驗組和對照組，每組41例，對照組患者採用複閤小樑切除術對患者進行治療，實驗組患者在應用複閤小樑切除術治療的基礎上給予可調整縫線術進行治療，對比分析兩組患者的臨床治療效果。結果兩組患者經治療後，實驗組患者的總有效率（92.67%）明顯高于對照組患者的總有效率（56.09%），差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。與此同時，實驗組患者的平均眼壓為（35.42±3.69）mmHg，對照組患者的平均眼壓為（34.08±3.19）mmHg，實驗組術後併髮癥的髮生率為（4.87%）明顯低于對照組患者治療後的術後併髮癥髮生率為（29.27%），差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論複閤小樑切除術聯閤可調整縫線術治療青光眼的臨床療效較僅應用複閤小樑切除術治療青光眼的臨床療效顯著，安全可靠，可以在臨床上廣汎應用。
목적：탐토분석대복합소량절제술연합가조정봉선술치료청광안적림상료효。방법선취재해원접수치료적청광안환자82례，장기평균분위실험조화대조조，매조41례，대조조환자채용복합소량절제술대환자진행치료，실험조환자재응용복합소량절제술치료적기출상급여가조정봉선술진행치료，대비분석량조환자적림상치료효과。결과량조환자경치료후，실험조환자적총유효솔（92.67%）명현고우대조조환자적총유효솔（56.09%），차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。여차동시，실험조환자적평균안압위（35.42±3.69）mmHg，대조조환자적평균안압위（34.08±3.19）mmHg，실험조술후병발증적발생솔위（4.87%）명현저우대조조환자치료후적술후병발증발생솔위（29.27%），차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론복합소량절제술연합가조정봉선술치료청광안적림상료효교부응용복합소량절제술치료청광안적림상료효현저，안전가고，가이재림상상엄범응용。
Objective To analyze and study the clinical curative effect of complex trabeculectomy combined with adjustable suture on glaucoma. Methods 82 cases of patients with glaucoma treated in our hospital were selected and divided into the experimental group and the control group with 41 cases in each. The control group were treated with complex trabeculectomy, the experimental group were treated with adjustable suture on the basis of complex trabeculectomy. The clinical curative effect of two groups was compared and analyzed. Results After treatment, the total effective rate (92.67%) of the patients in the experimental group was significantly higher than that (56.09%) of the patients in the control group, the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.05). The average IOP of the patients in the experimental group was (35.42±3.69)mmHg, and that of the patients in the control group was (34.08±3.19)mmHg; the incidence of postoperative complications of the experimental group was 4.87%, obviously lower than that (29.27%) of the control group, the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion The clinical curative effect of com-plex trabeculectomy combined with adjustable suture is better than that of complex trabeculectomy for the treatment of glaucoma, and it is safe and reliable, so can be widely used in clinical practice.
