上海医药
上海醫藥
상해의약
SHANGHAI MEDICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL JOURNAL
2014年
11期
49-53
,共5页
抵触申请%重复授权%非显而易见性%审查标准
牴觸申請%重複授權%非顯而易見性%審查標準
저촉신청%중복수권%비현이역견성%심사표준
conlficting applications%double patenting%non-obviousness%examination standards
通过分析美国近期发生的“Lilly vs Teva”生物医药专利重复授权纠纷案,深入研究美国专利重复授权的审查标准,在此基础上讨论我国目前重复授权的审查标准,指出存在的问题及可能带来的一些不利影响。最后结合美国重复授权审查标准,对我国重复授权审查标准的完善提出建议。
通過分析美國近期髮生的“Lilly vs Teva”生物醫藥專利重複授權糾紛案,深入研究美國專利重複授權的審查標準,在此基礎上討論我國目前重複授權的審查標準,指齣存在的問題及可能帶來的一些不利影響。最後結閤美國重複授權審查標準,對我國重複授權審查標準的完善提齣建議。
통과분석미국근기발생적“Lilly vs Teva”생물의약전리중복수권규분안,심입연구미국전리중복수권적심사표준,재차기출상토론아국목전중복수권적심사표준,지출존재적문제급가능대래적일사불리영향。최후결합미국중복수권심사표준,대아국중복수권심사표준적완선제출건의。
The examination standard for double patenting in the U.S. was deeply studied by analyzing the bio-pharmaceutical patent disputes concerning double patenting between Eli Lilly and Teva. On this basis, the examination standard of double patenting in China was discussed and the problems and possible adverse impact were also pointed out. And ifnally, several pieces of reasonable suggestions were proposed so as to complete Chinese examination standard of double patenting based on that in the U.S..