中国骨与关节外科
中國骨與關節外科
중국골여관절외과
CHINESE BONE AND JOINT SURGERY
2013年
5期
427-429,433
,共4页
张权%孙宁%朱仕文%武展雄%危杰
張權%孫寧%硃仕文%武展雄%危傑
장권%손저%주사문%무전웅%위걸
转子间骨折%围手术期%隐性失血
轉子間骨摺%圍手術期%隱性失血
전자간골절%위수술기%은성실혈
intertrochanteric fracture%perioperative period%hidden blood loss
背景:股骨转子间骨折的微创治疗已广泛应用于临床,但隐性失血尚未得到广泛重视,对其研究较少。<br> 目的:比较应用髓外固定物动力髋螺钉(DHS)和髓内固定物(PFNA、InterTan)治疗股骨转子间骨折围手术期的显性和隐性失血量,分析隐性失血的影响因素,为内固定物的选择提供临床依据。<br> 方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2011年12月应用DHS或PFNA、InterTan治疗的股骨转子间骨折患者89例,记录患者年龄、性别、身高、体重,记录术中及术后显性失血量,手术时间,手术前后的血红蛋白(Hb)和红细胞压积(Hct)。应用Gross方程计算总失血量和隐性失血量,对统计数据进行比较分析。<br> 结果:应用DHS 24例,总失血量平均为832 ml,其中显性失血量为187 ml(22.5%),隐性失血量为645ml(77.5%);应用PFNA 38例,总失血量平均为210 ml,其中显性失血量为123 ml(58.5%),隐性失血量为87 ml(41.4%);应用InterTan 27例,总失血量平均为1054 ml,其中显性失血量为153ml(14.5%),隐性失血量为901 ml(85.5%)。<br> 结论:股骨转子间骨折患者常存在严重的隐性失血,极易引起术后贫血,需严密监控患者的失血量。髓外和髓内固定方法的出血量基本一致,髓内固定方法具有更强的力学稳定性,髓内固定物PFNA的操作简单,出血量相对较少,可作为治疗股骨转子间骨折的首选方法。
揹景:股骨轉子間骨摺的微創治療已廣汎應用于臨床,但隱性失血尚未得到廣汎重視,對其研究較少。<br> 目的:比較應用髓外固定物動力髖螺釘(DHS)和髓內固定物(PFNA、InterTan)治療股骨轉子間骨摺圍手術期的顯性和隱性失血量,分析隱性失血的影響因素,為內固定物的選擇提供臨床依據。<br> 方法:迴顧性分析2010年1月至2011年12月應用DHS或PFNA、InterTan治療的股骨轉子間骨摺患者89例,記錄患者年齡、性彆、身高、體重,記錄術中及術後顯性失血量,手術時間,手術前後的血紅蛋白(Hb)和紅細胞壓積(Hct)。應用Gross方程計算總失血量和隱性失血量,對統計數據進行比較分析。<br> 結果:應用DHS 24例,總失血量平均為832 ml,其中顯性失血量為187 ml(22.5%),隱性失血量為645ml(77.5%);應用PFNA 38例,總失血量平均為210 ml,其中顯性失血量為123 ml(58.5%),隱性失血量為87 ml(41.4%);應用InterTan 27例,總失血量平均為1054 ml,其中顯性失血量為153ml(14.5%),隱性失血量為901 ml(85.5%)。<br> 結論:股骨轉子間骨摺患者常存在嚴重的隱性失血,極易引起術後貧血,需嚴密鑑控患者的失血量。髓外和髓內固定方法的齣血量基本一緻,髓內固定方法具有更彊的力學穩定性,髓內固定物PFNA的操作簡單,齣血量相對較少,可作為治療股骨轉子間骨摺的首選方法。
배경:고골전자간골절적미창치료이엄범응용우림상,단은성실혈상미득도엄범중시,대기연구교소。<br> 목적:비교응용수외고정물동력관라정(DHS)화수내고정물(PFNA、InterTan)치료고골전자간골절위수술기적현성화은성실혈량,분석은성실혈적영향인소,위내고정물적선택제공림상의거。<br> 방법:회고성분석2010년1월지2011년12월응용DHS혹PFNA、InterTan치료적고골전자간골절환자89례,기록환자년령、성별、신고、체중,기록술중급술후현성실혈량,수술시간,수술전후적혈홍단백(Hb)화홍세포압적(Hct)。응용Gross방정계산총실혈량화은성실혈량,대통계수거진행비교분석。<br> 결과:응용DHS 24례,총실혈량평균위832 ml,기중현성실혈량위187 ml(22.5%),은성실혈량위645ml(77.5%);응용PFNA 38례,총실혈량평균위210 ml,기중현성실혈량위123 ml(58.5%),은성실혈량위87 ml(41.4%);응용InterTan 27례,총실혈량평균위1054 ml,기중현성실혈량위153ml(14.5%),은성실혈량위901 ml(85.5%)。<br> 결론:고골전자간골절환자상존재엄중적은성실혈,겁역인기술후빈혈,수엄밀감공환자적실혈량。수외화수내고정방법적출혈량기본일치,수내고정방법구유경강적역학은정성,수내고정물PFNA적조작간단,출혈량상대교소,가작위치료고골전자간골절적수선방법。
Background: Minimally invasive treatment for femoral intertrochanteric fractures is popular in clinic. However, there are few researches on the hidden blood loss during surgery. <br> Objective:To evaluate external and hidden blood loss and to identify the influential factor of hidden blood loss in femoral intertrochanteric fracture treated with extramedullary (DHS) or intramedullary fixation (PFNA and InterTan). <br> Methods: We retrospectively studied 89 cases of femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated with DHS, PFNA or InterTan from January 2010 to December 2011. The collected information included age, gender, body height, body weight, intraoperative and postoprerative external blood loss, and preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit. The total blood loss and hidden blood loss was calculated by Gross formula. <br> Results:The mean total blood loss was 832 ml in 24 patients treated with DHS;external blood loss and hidden blood loss was 187 ml (22.5%) and 645 ml (77.5%), respectively. The mean total blood loss was 210 ml in 38 patients treated with PFNA;external blood loss and hidden blood loss was 123 ml (58.5%) and 87 ml (41.4%), respectively. The mean total blood loss was 1054 ml in 27 patients treated with InterTan;external blood loss and hidden blood loss was 153 ml (14.5%) and 901 ml (85.5%), respectively. <br> Conclusions:Patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures suffer heavy hidden blood loss, which may result in postopera-tive anemia. There is no significant difference in the total blood loss between extramedullary and intramedullary fixation. But intramedullary fixation is more stable than extramedullary one. So PFNA can be the first choice for femoral intertro-chanteric fractures due to simple procedure and less blood loss.