南方医科大学学报
南方醫科大學學報
남방의과대학학보
JOURNAL OF SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
2013年
11期
1656-1660
,共5页
吴君正%许晓飞%刘浩%李国新
吳君正%許曉飛%劉浩%李國新
오군정%허효비%류호%리국신
腹腔镜胆囊切除术%胆囊结石%肝外型肝胆管结石%经内镜逆行胆胰管造影%经内镜乳头肌切开
腹腔鏡膽囊切除術%膽囊結石%肝外型肝膽管結石%經內鏡逆行膽胰管造影%經內鏡乳頭肌切開
복강경담낭절제술%담낭결석%간외형간담관결석%경내경역행담이관조영%경내경유두기절개
laparoscopic cholecystectomy%cholelithiasis%choledocholithiasis%endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph%endoscopic sphincterotomy
目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)联合经十二指肠镜逆行胆胰管造影(ERCP)同期治疗胆囊结石并肝外型肝胆管结石的临床疗效及意义。方法回顾性分析LC联合ERCP同期治疗胆囊结石并肝外型肝胆管结石30例患者(A组)和LC联合腹腔镜胆总管探查(1aparoscopic common bile duct exploration,LCBDE)32例患者(B组)的临床资料,对两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、中转开腹数、术后下床活动时间、结石残留率、术后并发症、住院总费用和平均总住院日等指标进行对比分析。结果研究结果提示两种术式的住院总费用及平均总住院日差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而手术时间、术中出血量、中转开腹、术后下床活动时间、结石残留率及手术并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜联合十二指肠镜同期治疗胆囊结石并肝外型肝胆管结石具有恢复快、住院时间短等优点,可能是一种安全、可行的微创手术方式。
目的:探討腹腔鏡膽囊切除術(LC)聯閤經十二指腸鏡逆行膽胰管造影(ERCP)同期治療膽囊結石併肝外型肝膽管結石的臨床療效及意義。方法迴顧性分析LC聯閤ERCP同期治療膽囊結石併肝外型肝膽管結石30例患者(A組)和LC聯閤腹腔鏡膽總管探查(1aparoscopic common bile duct exploration,LCBDE)32例患者(B組)的臨床資料,對兩組患者的手術時間、術中齣血量、中轉開腹數、術後下床活動時間、結石殘留率、術後併髮癥、住院總費用和平均總住院日等指標進行對比分析。結果研究結果提示兩種術式的住院總費用及平均總住院日差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),而手術時間、術中齣血量、中轉開腹、術後下床活動時間、結石殘留率及手術併髮癥差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論腹腔鏡聯閤十二指腸鏡同期治療膽囊結石併肝外型肝膽管結石具有恢複快、住院時間短等優點,可能是一種安全、可行的微創手術方式。
목적:탐토복강경담낭절제술(LC)연합경십이지장경역행담이관조영(ERCP)동기치료담낭결석병간외형간담관결석적림상료효급의의。방법회고성분석LC연합ERCP동기치료담낭결석병간외형간담관결석30례환자(A조)화LC연합복강경담총관탐사(1aparoscopic common bile duct exploration,LCBDE)32례환자(B조)적림상자료,대량조환자적수술시간、술중출혈량、중전개복수、술후하상활동시간、결석잔류솔、술후병발증、주원총비용화평균총주원일등지표진행대비분석。결과연구결과제시량충술식적주원총비용급평균총주원일차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),이수술시간、술중출혈량、중전개복、술후하상활동시간、결석잔류솔급수술병발증차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론복강경연합십이지장경동기치료담낭결석병간외형간담관결석구유회복쾌、주원시간단등우점,가능시일충안전、가행적미창수술방식。
Objective To assess the clinical effects of combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique for one-stage treatment of cholelithiasis with concomitant choledocholithiasis. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of the clinical data of 30 patients (Group A) with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis receiving one- stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with intraoperative encoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) and 32 patients (Group B) receiving LC combined with 1aparoscopic common bile duct exploration. The operative time, blood loss, conversion to open surgery rate, time to postoperative ambulation, calculi residual rate, hospitalization cost and length of hospital stay were analyzed comparatively. Results There were statistically differences between the two groups in hospitalization cost and length of hospital stay (P<0.05) but not in the other indices (P>0.05). Conclusion Combined endoscopic-laparoscopic techniques can be a safe and feasible option for one- stage treatment of concomitant cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis to allow rapid postoperative recovery with a shortened hospital stay.