中华临床医师杂志(电子版)
中華臨床醫師雜誌(電子版)
중화림상의사잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICIANS(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2013年
15期
6970-6973
,共4页
王文武%陈曦%解方为%余宗阳%陈朗%陈雄%欧阳学农
王文武%陳晞%解方為%餘宗暘%陳朗%陳雄%歐暘學農
왕문무%진희%해방위%여종양%진랑%진웅%구양학농
腹水%输注,胃肠外%深部热疗%内皮抑素类%氟尿嘧啶
腹水%輸註,胃腸外%深部熱療%內皮抑素類%氟尿嘧啶
복수%수주,위장외%심부열료%내피억소류%불뇨밀정
Ascites%Infusions,parenteral%Regional thermotherapy%Endostatins%Fluorouraci
目的:观察重组人血管内皮抑制素(恩度)联合氟尿嘧啶腹腔灌注并配合深部热疗治疗恶性腹水的疗效和安全性。方法60例恶性腹水患者分为治疗组(腹腔内恩度联合氟尿嘧啶腹腔灌注后热疗)和对照组(腹腔内氟尿嘧啶单药灌注后热疗)。治疗前均先尽量排尽腹水,治疗组在腹腔内注入氟尿嘧啶1.0 g和恩度60 mg,每周3次(d1、d4、d7)。连续3次为1周期,间隔1周时间进行下一周期治疗。对照组除不加入恩度外,其余同治疗组。对照组和治疗组均在腔内治疗后30 min 行深部热疗,热疗温度为43℃以上,每次45~60 min。所有患者均接受2个周期治疗,第2周期治疗结束后,按照WHO腹水标准评价近期疗效,参照Karnofsky评分(KPS)变化评价生活质量(QOL),按照NCICTC 3.0版分级标准评价毒性反应。结果在可评价的60例患者中,治疗组客观有效率78.8%(26/33),对照组48.1%(13/27),两组疗效差异显著(P=0.017)。治疗组获生活质量改善25例(75.8%),对照组获生活质量改善11例(40.7%),两组比较有统计学差异(P=0.008)。治疗组与对照组比较,未明显增加毒副反应,全组患者耐受良好,无治疗相关性死亡。治疗组和对照组的中位疾病进展时间(TTP)分别为100 d和48 d,两组差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。结论恩度联合氟尿嘧啶腹腔灌注的给药模式并配合深部热疗治疗恶性腹水具有较好的近期疗效和生活质量改善,毒副反应均可耐受,可成为治疗恶性腹水的新手段之一,也可为恶性浆膜腔积液治疗提供新的思路,值得临床推广。
目的:觀察重組人血管內皮抑製素(恩度)聯閤氟尿嘧啶腹腔灌註併配閤深部熱療治療噁性腹水的療效和安全性。方法60例噁性腹水患者分為治療組(腹腔內恩度聯閤氟尿嘧啶腹腔灌註後熱療)和對照組(腹腔內氟尿嘧啶單藥灌註後熱療)。治療前均先儘量排儘腹水,治療組在腹腔內註入氟尿嘧啶1.0 g和恩度60 mg,每週3次(d1、d4、d7)。連續3次為1週期,間隔1週時間進行下一週期治療。對照組除不加入恩度外,其餘同治療組。對照組和治療組均在腔內治療後30 min 行深部熱療,熱療溫度為43℃以上,每次45~60 min。所有患者均接受2箇週期治療,第2週期治療結束後,按照WHO腹水標準評價近期療效,參照Karnofsky評分(KPS)變化評價生活質量(QOL),按照NCICTC 3.0版分級標準評價毒性反應。結果在可評價的60例患者中,治療組客觀有效率78.8%(26/33),對照組48.1%(13/27),兩組療效差異顯著(P=0.017)。治療組穫生活質量改善25例(75.8%),對照組穫生活質量改善11例(40.7%),兩組比較有統計學差異(P=0.008)。治療組與對照組比較,未明顯增加毒副反應,全組患者耐受良好,無治療相關性死亡。治療組和對照組的中位疾病進展時間(TTP)分彆為100 d和48 d,兩組差異有統計學意義(P=0.000)。結論恩度聯閤氟尿嘧啶腹腔灌註的給藥模式併配閤深部熱療治療噁性腹水具有較好的近期療效和生活質量改善,毒副反應均可耐受,可成為治療噁性腹水的新手段之一,也可為噁性漿膜腔積液治療提供新的思路,值得臨床推廣。
목적:관찰중조인혈관내피억제소(은도)연합불뇨밀정복강관주병배합심부열료치료악성복수적료효화안전성。방법60례악성복수환자분위치료조(복강내은도연합불뇨밀정복강관주후열료)화대조조(복강내불뇨밀정단약관주후열료)。치료전균선진량배진복수,치료조재복강내주입불뇨밀정1.0 g화은도60 mg,매주3차(d1、d4、d7)。련속3차위1주기,간격1주시간진행하일주기치료。대조조제불가입은도외,기여동치료조。대조조화치료조균재강내치료후30 min 행심부열료,열료온도위43℃이상,매차45~60 min。소유환자균접수2개주기치료,제2주기치료결속후,안조WHO복수표준평개근기료효,삼조Karnofsky평분(KPS)변화평개생활질량(QOL),안조NCICTC 3.0판분급표준평개독성반응。결과재가평개적60례환자중,치료조객관유효솔78.8%(26/33),대조조48.1%(13/27),량조료효차이현저(P=0.017)。치료조획생활질량개선25례(75.8%),대조조획생활질량개선11례(40.7%),량조비교유통계학차이(P=0.008)。치료조여대조조비교,미명현증가독부반응,전조환자내수량호,무치료상관성사망。치료조화대조조적중위질병진전시간(TTP)분별위100 d화48 d,량조차이유통계학의의(P=0.000)。결론은도연합불뇨밀정복강관주적급약모식병배합심부열료치료악성복수구유교호적근기료효화생활질량개선,독부반응균가내수,가성위치료악성복수적신수단지일,야가위악성장막강적액치료제공신적사로,치득림상추엄。
Objective Tostudy the efficacy and safety of intracavitary injection of endostar combined with fluorouraci and with regional thermotherapy on malignant ascites. Methods 60 cancer patients with malignant ascites confirmed by cytopathology were divided intotwogroups, treatment group(intracavitary injection of endostar combined with fluorouraci and with regional thermotherapy), control group(intracavitary injection of fluorouraci with regional thermotherapy), 60 mg endostar combined with 1.0 g fluorouracil were injected intracavitary in treatment group, q3 d(d1,d4,d7), three consecutive cavity infusion was a cycle, next cycle of treatment were a week later. The control group were the same as treatment group except from endostar. Thirty minutes after cavity infusion, the control group and treatment group were all treated with regional thermotherapy with 43℃ for 45-60 min. All patients were treated with twocycles, The elfleacv was evaluated strictly according toWHO criteria and safety according toNCI-CTC AE 3.0 version criteria. Results Among the evaluable 76 cases, the objective response rate(ORR) was 78.8%in treatment group, the control group was 48.1%(P<0.05). The improvement rate of QOL was 75.8%(25/32) in treatment group comparing with 40.7%(11/28) in treatment group(P=0.008). Median TTP of treatment treatment(n=32) and control group(n=28) were l00 days vs. 48 days(P=0.000), all the patients were of good tolerance as a whole and nosevere side effects happened. Conclusions Intracavitary injection of endostar combined with fluorouraci and with regional thermotherapy results in a good response rate and improvement of QOL for the patients with malignant ascites.The combined regimen was low-toxic and tolerable.It is a new way totreat malignant ascites and worthy of further clinical promotion.