中华临床医师杂志(电子版)
中華臨床醫師雜誌(電子版)
중화림상의사잡지(전자판)
CHINESE JOURNAL OF CLINICIANS(ELECTRONIC VERSION)
2013年
15期
6880-6883
,共4页
赵娟%王火强%刘进军%赵龙
趙娟%王火彊%劉進軍%趙龍
조연%왕화강%류진군%조룡
氟脱氧葡萄糖F18%肺肿瘤%复发
氟脫氧葡萄糖F18%肺腫瘤%複髮
불탈양포도당F18%폐종류%복발
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18%Lung neoplasms%Recurrence
目的:探讨18F-FDG 符合线路显像在肺癌术后复发诊断中的临床价值。方法回顾性分析81例肺癌根治性术后随访期间临床可疑复发的患者,记录患者的治疗资料、可疑复发表现、18F-FDG符合线路显像结果、病理及临床随访结果。结果18F-FDG符合线路显像诊断肺癌术后复发59例,最终经病理及临床随访结果证实肺癌术后复发53例,1例炎性肉芽组织,1例肺内纤维组织增生,1例慢性炎症改变,1例肺脓肿,1例放射性肺炎,1例肺部真菌感染。FDG显像未见明显复发转移征象的22例患者中,2例肺内转移,1例左侧锁骨上淋巴结转移,1例黏液腺癌,1例黏液型细支气管肺泡癌,其余17例患者随访期间未见明显异常。18F-FDG符合线路显像诊断肺癌术后复发灵敏度为91.4%(53/58),特异性为73.9%(17/23),准确性为86.4%(70/81),阳性预测值为89.8%(53/59),阴性预测值为77.3%(17/22)。结论18F-FDG符合线路显像对肺癌术后复发诊断具有一定的临床价值。
目的:探討18F-FDG 符閤線路顯像在肺癌術後複髮診斷中的臨床價值。方法迴顧性分析81例肺癌根治性術後隨訪期間臨床可疑複髮的患者,記錄患者的治療資料、可疑複髮錶現、18F-FDG符閤線路顯像結果、病理及臨床隨訪結果。結果18F-FDG符閤線路顯像診斷肺癌術後複髮59例,最終經病理及臨床隨訪結果證實肺癌術後複髮53例,1例炎性肉芽組織,1例肺內纖維組織增生,1例慢性炎癥改變,1例肺膿腫,1例放射性肺炎,1例肺部真菌感染。FDG顯像未見明顯複髮轉移徵象的22例患者中,2例肺內轉移,1例左側鎖骨上淋巴結轉移,1例黏液腺癌,1例黏液型細支氣管肺泡癌,其餘17例患者隨訪期間未見明顯異常。18F-FDG符閤線路顯像診斷肺癌術後複髮靈敏度為91.4%(53/58),特異性為73.9%(17/23),準確性為86.4%(70/81),暘性預測值為89.8%(53/59),陰性預測值為77.3%(17/22)。結論18F-FDG符閤線路顯像對肺癌術後複髮診斷具有一定的臨床價值。
목적:탐토18F-FDG 부합선로현상재폐암술후복발진단중적림상개치。방법회고성분석81례폐암근치성술후수방기간림상가의복발적환자,기록환자적치료자료、가의복발표현、18F-FDG부합선로현상결과、병리급림상수방결과。결과18F-FDG부합선로현상진단폐암술후복발59례,최종경병리급림상수방결과증실폐암술후복발53례,1례염성육아조직,1례폐내섬유조직증생,1례만성염증개변,1례폐농종,1례방사성폐염,1례폐부진균감염。FDG현상미견명현복발전이정상적22례환자중,2례폐내전이,1례좌측쇄골상림파결전이,1례점액선암,1례점액형세지기관폐포암,기여17례환자수방기간미견명현이상。18F-FDG부합선로현상진단폐암술후복발령민도위91.4%(53/58),특이성위73.9%(17/23),준학성위86.4%(70/81),양성예측치위89.8%(53/59),음성예측치위77.3%(17/22)。결론18F-FDG부합선로현상대폐암술후복발진단구유일정적림상개치。
Objective To investigate the clinical value of 18F-FDG coincidence imaging for the diagnosis of postoperative lung cancer recurrence. Methods 81 cases of lung cancer, clinically suspected to have tumor recurrence during follow-up , were restrospectively analyzed and the patient's treatment material, suspicious recurrence performance, 18F-FDG coincidence Imaging results, pathology and clinical follow-up results were recorded. Results In total, 59 patients were found to have positive lesions by 18F-FDG coincidence imaging, in which 53 cases were true recurrence which eventually confirmed by pathology and clinical follow-up results, the others including 1 case of inflammatory granulation tissue, 1 case of fibrous tissue hyperplasia in lung, 1 case of chronic inflammatory change, 1 case of pulmonary abscess, 1 case of radiation pneumonia, and 1 case of pulmonary fungus infection. FDG imaging had not showed obvious signs of relapse and metastasis in 22 patients, including 2 cases of pulmonary metastasis, 1 case of left supraclavicular lymph node metastasis, 1 case of mucus gland carcinoma, 1 case of mucous bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. The rest of the 17 patients were not seen obvious anomaly during follow-up. In patient-based analyses, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 18F-FDG coincidence imaging for the detection of tumor recurrence were 91.4%(53/58), 73.9%(17/23), 86.4%(70/81), (53/59), and 77.3%(17/22)respectively. Conclusion 18F-FDG coincidence imaging has clinical value for the diagnosis of postoperative lung cancer recurrence.