浙江临床医学
浙江臨床醫學
절강림상의학
ZHEJIANG CLINICAL MEDICAL JOURNAL
2014年
5期
679-680,681
,共3页
余芳%谢漫%李爱萍%娄坤
餘芳%謝漫%李愛萍%婁坤
여방%사만%리애평%루곤
高压氧%康复%介入时间%功能独立性评定
高壓氧%康複%介入時間%功能獨立性評定
고압양%강복%개입시간%공능독립성평정
Hyperbaric oxygen%Recovery%Intervention in time%FIM
目的:观察颅脑外伤患者高压氧介入时间对功能独立性评定(FIM)评分的影响,为探讨综合康复治疗最佳介入时机提供临床依据。方法选择中重型颅脑外伤患者130例,根据受伤时间分为对照组25例,综合康复1组(TBI<15d)与综合康复2组(15d≤TBI≤30d)各40例,综合康复3组(TBI>30d)25例,均给予药物治疗和康复措施,综合康复各组在前述的基础上行高压氧治疗共40次,以治疗前和治疗第30天、60天的FIM评分进行疗效评价。结果资料完整、实际纳入组TBI患者共123例,各组临床资料有可比性。各组内TBI患者在治疗第30天、60天的FIM评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。各组间TBI患者第1天FIM评分差异无统计学意义(P<0.05),对照组与综合康复1、2组在第30天、60天差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论三组TBI患者2个月内FIM评分改善呈匀速好转趋势,30d内的高压氧综合康复1、2组对认知与运动功能改善作用明显优于对照组,优于综合康复3组患者。
目的:觀察顱腦外傷患者高壓氧介入時間對功能獨立性評定(FIM)評分的影響,為探討綜閤康複治療最佳介入時機提供臨床依據。方法選擇中重型顱腦外傷患者130例,根據受傷時間分為對照組25例,綜閤康複1組(TBI<15d)與綜閤康複2組(15d≤TBI≤30d)各40例,綜閤康複3組(TBI>30d)25例,均給予藥物治療和康複措施,綜閤康複各組在前述的基礎上行高壓氧治療共40次,以治療前和治療第30天、60天的FIM評分進行療效評價。結果資料完整、實際納入組TBI患者共123例,各組臨床資料有可比性。各組內TBI患者在治療第30天、60天的FIM評分差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。各組間TBI患者第1天FIM評分差異無統計學意義(P<0.05),對照組與綜閤康複1、2組在第30天、60天差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論三組TBI患者2箇月內FIM評分改善呈勻速好轉趨勢,30d內的高壓氧綜閤康複1、2組對認知與運動功能改善作用明顯優于對照組,優于綜閤康複3組患者。
목적:관찰로뇌외상환자고압양개입시간대공능독립성평정(FIM)평분적영향,위탐토종합강복치료최가개입시궤제공림상의거。방법선택중중형로뇌외상환자130례,근거수상시간분위대조조25례,종합강복1조(TBI<15d)여종합강복2조(15d≤TBI≤30d)각40례,종합강복3조(TBI>30d)25례,균급여약물치료화강복조시,종합강복각조재전술적기출상행고압양치료공40차,이치료전화치료제30천、60천적FIM평분진행료효평개。결과자료완정、실제납입조TBI환자공123례,각조림상자료유가비성。각조내TBI환자재치료제30천、60천적FIM평분차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。각조간TBI환자제1천FIM평분차이무통계학의의(P<0.05),대조조여종합강복1、2조재제30천、60천차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론삼조TBI환자2개월내FIM평분개선정균속호전추세,30d내적고압양종합강복1、2조대인지여운동공능개선작용명현우우대조조,우우종합강복3조환자。
Objective To investigate the effect of Hyperbaric Oxygen Intervention in time on improving the FIM scores in Traumatic Brain Injury patients and provide clinical evidence on discussing the best Intervene opportunity of comprehensive rehabilitation therapy. Method Choosing 130 patients with middle or sever cerebral injury and dividing into several groups according to the time of injury :25 cases of control group,40 cases both in the second group of comprehensive rehabilitation(TBI<15 days)and the third group of comprehensive rehabilitation(15 days<TBI<30 days),25 cases of the forth group of comprehensive rehabilitation(TBI>30 days),all give drug therapies and rehabilitation measures. Additional 40 times hyperbaric oxygen therapy is added to the comprehensive rehabilitation group and FIM scores are used to evaluate curative effect. Outcome TBI patients with integral data in included groups are 123 cases.Each baseline is consistent with comparability. The FIM score is different in each group of patients with TBI during treatment in the 30th,60th day(P<0.05). The FIM score in the first day of patients with TBI is with no difference(P>0.05). FMI score in control group and comprehensive rehabilitation 1,2 groups is different in the 30th,60th day(P<0.05). Conclusion FIM score improving is moving a rising trend during two months. FIM score improving in hyperbaric oxygen comprehensive 1,2 groups are significantly better than in the control group. Both the two groups are ahead of TBI>30 days group in which patients are starting to receive hyperbaric oxygen therapy.