中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2013年
21期
15-16
,共2页
中药%内服外敷%亚急性甲状腺炎
中藥%內服外敷%亞急性甲狀腺炎
중약%내복외부%아급성갑상선염
TCM%Oral administration and external application%Subacute thyroiditis
目的:探讨中药内服外敷联合治疗亚急性甲状腺炎的临床效果。方法:选取我院于2008年6月~2012年11月在我院接受治疗的64例患有亚急性甲状腺炎患者的临床资料,将64例亚急性甲状腺炎患者平均分为治疗组与对照组,治疗组32例患者采取中药内服与外敷联合治疗方法;对照组32例患者采用口服泼尼松、布洛芬胶囊等西药方法进行治疗。两组患者均按照各自治疗方法治疗3个月,对比两组患者临床治疗效果以及治疗前后的实验室数据指标和病症复发率。结果:治疗组通过中药内服外敷治疗方法治疗亚急性甲状腺炎,患者治愈22例,好转4例,未治愈6例,总有效率81.25%;对照组采用口服泼尼松等西药方法进行治疗亚急性甲状腺炎,患者治愈13例,好转8例,未治愈11例,总有效率65.63%。两组患者治疗后各临床症状改善,但治疗组治疗效果明显优于对照组,有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组不良反应率对比 P>0.05,无统计学意义。治疗3个月后,治疗组与对照组两组患者治疗前后在实验室数据指标上并没有明显差异(P>0.05),无统计学意义。但是在亚急性甲状腺炎的临床症状恢复上面有明显差异(P<0.05),有统计学意义。结论:亚急性甲状腺炎在临床治疗中采用中药内服外敷方法具有明显效果,且患者无不良反应症状,值得临床推广应用。
目的:探討中藥內服外敷聯閤治療亞急性甲狀腺炎的臨床效果。方法:選取我院于2008年6月~2012年11月在我院接受治療的64例患有亞急性甲狀腺炎患者的臨床資料,將64例亞急性甲狀腺炎患者平均分為治療組與對照組,治療組32例患者採取中藥內服與外敷聯閤治療方法;對照組32例患者採用口服潑尼鬆、佈洛芬膠囊等西藥方法進行治療。兩組患者均按照各自治療方法治療3箇月,對比兩組患者臨床治療效果以及治療前後的實驗室數據指標和病癥複髮率。結果:治療組通過中藥內服外敷治療方法治療亞急性甲狀腺炎,患者治愈22例,好轉4例,未治愈6例,總有效率81.25%;對照組採用口服潑尼鬆等西藥方法進行治療亞急性甲狀腺炎,患者治愈13例,好轉8例,未治愈11例,總有效率65.63%。兩組患者治療後各臨床癥狀改善,但治療組治療效果明顯優于對照組,有統計學意義(P<0.05),兩組不良反應率對比 P>0.05,無統計學意義。治療3箇月後,治療組與對照組兩組患者治療前後在實驗室數據指標上併沒有明顯差異(P>0.05),無統計學意義。但是在亞急性甲狀腺炎的臨床癥狀恢複上麵有明顯差異(P<0.05),有統計學意義。結論:亞急性甲狀腺炎在臨床治療中採用中藥內服外敷方法具有明顯效果,且患者無不良反應癥狀,值得臨床推廣應用。
목적:탐토중약내복외부연합치료아급성갑상선염적림상효과。방법:선취아원우2008년6월~2012년11월재아원접수치료적64례환유아급성갑상선염환자적림상자료,장64례아급성갑상선염환자평균분위치료조여대조조,치료조32례환자채취중약내복여외부연합치료방법;대조조32례환자채용구복발니송、포락분효낭등서약방법진행치료。량조환자균안조각자치료방법치료3개월,대비량조환자림상치료효과이급치료전후적실험실수거지표화병증복발솔。결과:치료조통과중약내복외부치료방법치료아급성갑상선염,환자치유22례,호전4례,미치유6례,총유효솔81.25%;대조조채용구복발니송등서약방법진행치료아급성갑상선염,환자치유13례,호전8례,미치유11례,총유효솔65.63%。량조환자치료후각림상증상개선,단치료조치료효과명현우우대조조,유통계학의의(P<0.05),량조불량반응솔대비 P>0.05,무통계학의의。치료3개월후,치료조여대조조량조환자치료전후재실험실수거지표상병몰유명현차이(P>0.05),무통계학의의。단시재아급성갑상선염적림상증상회복상면유명현차이(P<0.05),유통계학의의。결론:아급성갑상선염재림상치료중채용중약내복외부방법구유명현효과,차환자무불량반응증상,치득림상추엄응용。
Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of TCM oral administration and external application on treating subacute thyroiditis. Methods:64 cases of subacute thyroiditis admitted to our hospital from June 2008 to November 2012 were randomly divided into the control group and treated group. The treated group was given TCM oral administration and external application treatment, the control group was given oral prednisone, ibuprofen capsules and other modern methods treatment. The clinical effect, laboratory data index and disease recurrence rate between two groups before and after treatment were compared after 3 months treatment. Results:In the treated group, 22 cases were cured, 4 cases improved, not cure in 6 cases, the total efficiency was 81.25%;13 cases were cured, 8 cases improved, not cure in 11 cases, the total efficiency 65.63%in the control group. Treated group was obviously better than control group, with statistical significance (P<0.05), two groups of adverse reaction rate compared to P>0.05, not statistically significant. After 3 months of treatment, treated group and control group before and after treatment in the laboratory data indicators and no significant difference (P>0.05), no statistically significant. Between two groups, clinical symptom recovery with significant difference (P<0.05), there was statistical significance. Conclusion:CM oral administration and external application was effective on treating subacute thyroiditis, and patients with no symptoms of adverse reactions, worthy of a wide clinical application.