南通大学学报(医学版)
南通大學學報(醫學版)
남통대학학보(의학판)
JOURNAL OF NANTONG UNIVERSITY(MEDICAL SCIENCES)
2014年
3期
204-206
,共3页
谭露%储丽萍%邓继红%安红梅%马丽莎
譚露%儲麗萍%鄧繼紅%安紅梅%馬麗莎
담로%저려평%산계홍%안홍매%마려사
宫颈高度鳞状上皮内病变%即查即治%宫颈电环切术
宮頸高度鱗狀上皮內病變%即查即治%宮頸電環切術
궁경고도린상상피내병변%즉사즉치%궁경전배절술
high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion%see-and-treat%loop electrical excision procedure%three steps
目的:探讨“即查即治”方法对宫颈细胞学为高度鳞状上皮内病变(high-grade squamous intraepithelial le-sion, HSIL)妇女的诊治价值,为临床提供有价值的诊疗手段。方法:收集2010年1月-2013年1月,年龄25~83岁,宫颈细胞学筛查为HSIL的妇女200例,按随机化的方法分为实验组(即查即治)和对照组(传统三阶梯诊断程序方法)。比较两组的宫颈电环切术后并发症发生率及最终病理结果。结果:实验组与对照组在宫颈电环切术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。实验组宫颈上皮内瘤样病变(cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,CIN)病理符合率98%(98/100),对照组为97%(97/100),以病理结果≤CIN 1作为过度治疗评判标准,实验组和对照组过度治疗率分别为9%(9/100)、11%(11/100),两组病理结果及过度治疗率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:“即查即治”策略处理宫颈细胞学为HSIL是安全、经济和有效的诊疗手段。
目的:探討“即查即治”方法對宮頸細胞學為高度鱗狀上皮內病變(high-grade squamous intraepithelial le-sion, HSIL)婦女的診治價值,為臨床提供有價值的診療手段。方法:收集2010年1月-2013年1月,年齡25~83歲,宮頸細胞學篩查為HSIL的婦女200例,按隨機化的方法分為實驗組(即查即治)和對照組(傳統三階梯診斷程序方法)。比較兩組的宮頸電環切術後併髮癥髮生率及最終病理結果。結果:實驗組與對照組在宮頸電環切術後併髮癥髮生率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。實驗組宮頸上皮內瘤樣病變(cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,CIN)病理符閤率98%(98/100),對照組為97%(97/100),以病理結果≤CIN 1作為過度治療評判標準,實驗組和對照組過度治療率分彆為9%(9/100)、11%(11/100),兩組病理結果及過度治療率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論:“即查即治”策略處理宮頸細胞學為HSIL是安全、經濟和有效的診療手段。
목적:탐토“즉사즉치”방법대궁경세포학위고도린상상피내병변(high-grade squamous intraepithelial le-sion, HSIL)부녀적진치개치,위림상제공유개치적진료수단。방법:수집2010년1월-2013년1월,년령25~83세,궁경세포학사사위HSIL적부녀200례,안수궤화적방법분위실험조(즉사즉치)화대조조(전통삼계제진단정서방법)。비교량조적궁경전배절술후병발증발생솔급최종병리결과。결과:실험조여대조조재궁경전배절술후병발증발생솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。실험조궁경상피내류양병변(cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,CIN)병리부합솔98%(98/100),대조조위97%(97/100),이병리결과≤CIN 1작위과도치료평판표준,실험조화대조조과도치료솔분별위9%(9/100)、11%(11/100),량조병리결과급과도치료솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론:“즉사즉치”책략처리궁경세포학위HSIL시안전、경제화유효적진료수단。
Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of see-and-treat strategy in the management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion(HSIL),so that to provide a valuable diagnosis and treatment method for HSIL. Methods: 200 non-pregnant women,aged 22-63 years old, recruited as HSIL from January 2010 to January 2013 were randomized into 2 groups:A see-and-treat strategy group,B traditional method of three steps group. The therapeutic efficacy and over-treatment rate of 2 groups were evaluated and compared. Results: There was no significant difference in postoperative complications in the LEEP and colposcopy score between two groups (P>0.05). Histological diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia(CIN) was confirmed in 98%(98/100) patients in see & treat group and 97%(97/100) in control group (P>0.05). Using histological diagnosis≤CIN 1 as overtreatment, the overtreatment rate was 9%(9/100) and 11%(11/100) in “see-and-treat” group and control group respectively (P>0.05). Conclusion:See-and-treat strategy is a safe,effective and economical method for the diagnosis and management of HSIL.