现代畜牧兽医
現代畜牧獸醫
현대축목수의
LIAONING JOURNAL OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY MEDICINE
2013年
12期
34-38
,共5页
孙亚波%边革%孙宝成%许桂华
孫亞波%邊革%孫寶成%許桂華
손아파%변혁%손보성%허계화
紫花苜蓿%辽宁绒山羊%营养价值
紫花苜蓿%遼寧絨山羊%營養價值
자화목숙%료녕융산양%영양개치
Alfalfa%Liaoning Cashmere Goats%Nutritional value
为了评价紫花苜蓿干草对不同类别辽宁绒山羊的营养价值,研究不同类别绒山羊对各种营养素消化利用能力,开展了本次试验研究。选择成年母羊、育成母羊、成年种公羊、育成公羊和羔羊各4只,依次设为1、2、3、4、5组,只饲喂苜蓿干草。测定不同类别辽宁绒山羊对苜蓿草各营养物质的消化、代谢和利用能力,评价苜蓿草对辽宁绒山羊的营养价值。结果表明,成年母羊对苜蓿草的纤维类和脂肪营养的消化率均高于育成公母羊,而育成公母羊对苜蓿草能量的表观代谢率和利用率均高于成年公母羊。羔羊对苜蓿草能量利用率均低于成年公母羊和育成公、母羊,并与育成公羊差异极显著(P<0.01);对苜蓿草钙、磷、纤维类营养、粗蛋白和粗脂肪的表观消化率也低于其他类绒山羊。
為瞭評價紫花苜蓿榦草對不同類彆遼寧絨山羊的營養價值,研究不同類彆絨山羊對各種營養素消化利用能力,開展瞭本次試驗研究。選擇成年母羊、育成母羊、成年種公羊、育成公羊和羔羊各4隻,依次設為1、2、3、4、5組,隻飼餵苜蓿榦草。測定不同類彆遼寧絨山羊對苜蓿草各營養物質的消化、代謝和利用能力,評價苜蓿草對遼寧絨山羊的營養價值。結果錶明,成年母羊對苜蓿草的纖維類和脂肪營養的消化率均高于育成公母羊,而育成公母羊對苜蓿草能量的錶觀代謝率和利用率均高于成年公母羊。羔羊對苜蓿草能量利用率均低于成年公母羊和育成公、母羊,併與育成公羊差異極顯著(P<0.01);對苜蓿草鈣、燐、纖維類營養、粗蛋白和粗脂肪的錶觀消化率也低于其他類絨山羊。
위료평개자화목숙간초대불동유별료녕융산양적영양개치,연구불동유별융산양대각충영양소소화이용능력,개전료본차시험연구。선택성년모양、육성모양、성년충공양、육성공양화고양각4지,의차설위1、2、3、4、5조,지사위목숙간초。측정불동유별료녕융산양대목숙초각영양물질적소화、대사화이용능력,평개목숙초대료녕융산양적영양개치。결과표명,성년모양대목숙초적섬유류화지방영양적소화솔균고우육성공모양,이육성공모양대목숙초능량적표관대사솔화이용솔균고우성년공모양。고양대목숙초능량이용솔균저우성년공모양화육성공、모양,병여육성공양차이겁현저(P<0.01);대목숙초개、린、섬유류영양、조단백화조지방적표관소화솔야저우기타류융산양。
Twenty Liaoning Cashmere Goats including four adult ewes, growing ewes, adult rams , growing rams and lambs were divided into group 1, group 2, group 3, group 4 and group 5 accordingly. The digestion, metabolism and utilization ablility of alfalfa in different kinds of Liaoning cashmere goat were de-tected in order to investigate the nutritional value of alfalfa. The result showed that apparent digestibility of CF,NDF,ADF and EE in group 1 were higher than others;the apparent metabolic rate and utilization rate of alfalfa energy in growing rams were higher than adult ewes and rams. The utilization rate of gross energy in lambs were lower than adult ewes and rams, growing ewes and rams, and there was an extremely significant difference in energy utilization rate between group 4 and group 5(P<0.01). The apparent digestibility of Ca, P, CF, NDF, ADF, CP and EE in group 5 were also lower than the other groups..