CAJ | 학술논문

在交际过程中，为了让听话人更好地理解话语，说话人可以向听话人提供明示导向的话语标记，从而对一系列的语境假设加以制约以减少听话人处理话语所需付出的努力。以关联理论为框架，通过对一份近五万字的法庭庭审语料进行分析，阐述了话语标记语对语境的制约作用主要表现在三个方面，即加强现时语境、消除现时语境以及产生新的语境暗含。
재교제과정중，위료양은화인경호지리해화어，설화인가이향은화인제공명시도향적화어표기，종이대일계렬적어경가설가이제약이감소은화인처리화어소수부출적노력。이관련이론위광가，통과대일빈근오만자적법정정심어료진행분석，천술료화어표기어대어경적제약작용주요표현재삼개방면，즉가강현시어경、소제현시어경이급산생신적어경암함。
Discourse markers,the road mark in the interpretation of utterances,can help the hearers minimize their efforts in comprehending the utterances by constraining the contextual as-sumptions.Based on the relevance theory,the paper illustrates the way in which discourse mark-ers constrain the context by analyzing linguistic data during the courtroom questioning and an-swering.At last,It proves that discourse markers can constrain the context in three ways:strengthening the existing assumption,erasing the existing assumption and deriving new contex-tual implications.