国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2014年
3期
314-319
,共6页
章海波%黄壮荣%马庆荣%李智佳%杨柳%宾晓农
章海波%黃壯榮%馬慶榮%李智佳%楊柳%賓曉農
장해파%황장영%마경영%리지가%양류%빈효농
二尖瓣%修复%置换术%生活质量
二尖瓣%脩複%置換術%生活質量
이첨판%수복%치환술%생활질량
Mitral valve%Plasty%Replacement%Quality of life
目的 评估经二尖瓣置换术(MVR)或二尖瓣修复(MVP)6个月后患者是否有具有生活质量(QOL)的实际改善.方法 随访1993年3月至2013年11月120例[51名男性,平均年龄(42.3±11.2)岁;69名女性,平均年龄(43.3±13.9)岁]接受二尖瓣置换术(MVR、n=82)或二尖瓣修复术(MVP、n=38)病人的QOL状况,使用生活质量评定量表(SF-36)分别于手术前和术后6个月以上进行问卷调查测定QOL指数,采用Wilcoxon配对符号秩和检验统计分析.结果 120例二尖瓣手术后随访患者的QOL指数平均得分有所改善,各维度QOL指数分值为:①生理功能:术后(58±29)vs.术前(41±26),P=0.000;②生理职能:术后(52±44)vs.术前(25±27),P=0.000;③社交功能:术后(76±36)vs.术前(55±38),P=0.000;④情感职能:术后(70±45)vs.术前(40±40),P=0.000;⑤生命活力:术后(57±33)vs.术前(40±30),P=0.000;⑥精神健康:术后(70±24)vs.术前(61±24),P=0.004;⑦总体健康:术后(65±29)vs.术前(52±26),P=0.0003;⑧身体痛苦:术后(70±30)vs.术前(68±33),P=0.624.MVP患者QOL指数与MVR患者健康维度QOL指数改善相同.射血分数≥50%患者和左心室功能受损患者的QOL指数在7个维度上显著改善.左室舒张末期内径≥50 mm患者在术后3个月的随访中QOL指数在5个维度上显著改善.结论 本次开展的二尖瓣疾病患者手术后6个月随访研究表明,经二尖瓣修复术的患者QOL提高明显,左心室功能受损和左室舒张末期尺寸≥50 mm的患者术后至少在5个维度上QOL明显改善.
目的 評估經二尖瓣置換術(MVR)或二尖瓣脩複(MVP)6箇月後患者是否有具有生活質量(QOL)的實際改善.方法 隨訪1993年3月至2013年11月120例[51名男性,平均年齡(42.3±11.2)歲;69名女性,平均年齡(43.3±13.9)歲]接受二尖瓣置換術(MVR、n=82)或二尖瓣脩複術(MVP、n=38)病人的QOL狀況,使用生活質量評定量錶(SF-36)分彆于手術前和術後6箇月以上進行問捲調查測定QOL指數,採用Wilcoxon配對符號秩和檢驗統計分析.結果 120例二尖瓣手術後隨訪患者的QOL指數平均得分有所改善,各維度QOL指數分值為:①生理功能:術後(58±29)vs.術前(41±26),P=0.000;②生理職能:術後(52±44)vs.術前(25±27),P=0.000;③社交功能:術後(76±36)vs.術前(55±38),P=0.000;④情感職能:術後(70±45)vs.術前(40±40),P=0.000;⑤生命活力:術後(57±33)vs.術前(40±30),P=0.000;⑥精神健康:術後(70±24)vs.術前(61±24),P=0.004;⑦總體健康:術後(65±29)vs.術前(52±26),P=0.0003;⑧身體痛苦:術後(70±30)vs.術前(68±33),P=0.624.MVP患者QOL指數與MVR患者健康維度QOL指數改善相同.射血分數≥50%患者和左心室功能受損患者的QOL指數在7箇維度上顯著改善.左室舒張末期內徑≥50 mm患者在術後3箇月的隨訪中QOL指數在5箇維度上顯著改善.結論 本次開展的二尖瓣疾病患者手術後6箇月隨訪研究錶明,經二尖瓣脩複術的患者QOL提高明顯,左心室功能受損和左室舒張末期呎吋≥50 mm的患者術後至少在5箇維度上QOL明顯改善.
목적 평고경이첨판치환술(MVR)혹이첨판수복(MVP)6개월후환자시부유구유생활질량(QOL)적실제개선.방법 수방1993년3월지2013년11월120례[51명남성,평균년령(42.3±11.2)세;69명녀성,평균년령(43.3±13.9)세]접수이첨판치환술(MVR、n=82)혹이첨판수복술(MVP、n=38)병인적QOL상황,사용생활질량평정량표(SF-36)분별우수술전화술후6개월이상진행문권조사측정QOL지수,채용Wilcoxon배대부호질화검험통계분석.결과 120례이첨판수술후수방환자적QOL지수평균득분유소개선,각유도QOL지수분치위:①생리공능:술후(58±29)vs.술전(41±26),P=0.000;②생리직능:술후(52±44)vs.술전(25±27),P=0.000;③사교공능:술후(76±36)vs.술전(55±38),P=0.000;④정감직능:술후(70±45)vs.술전(40±40),P=0.000;⑤생명활력:술후(57±33)vs.술전(40±30),P=0.000;⑥정신건강:술후(70±24)vs.술전(61±24),P=0.004;⑦총체건강:술후(65±29)vs.술전(52±26),P=0.0003;⑧신체통고:술후(70±30)vs.술전(68±33),P=0.624.MVP환자QOL지수여MVR환자건강유도QOL지수개선상동.사혈분수≥50%환자화좌심실공능수손환자적QOL지수재7개유도상현저개선.좌실서장말기내경≥50 mm환자재술후3개월적수방중QOL지수재5개유도상현저개선.결론 본차개전적이첨판질병환자수술후6개월수방연구표명,경이첨판수복술적환자QOL제고명현,좌심실공능수손화좌실서장말기척촌≥50 mm적환자술후지소재5개유도상QOL명현개선.
Objective To assess whether there is an actual improvement in quality of life (QOL) of patients 6 months following primary mitral valve plasty (MVP) or mitral valve replacement (MVR).Methods Following up study of 120 consecutive patients [51 males,the average age of (42.3 ± 11.2) years-old; 69 females,the average age of (43.3 ± 13.9) years-old] who underwent primary isolated mitral valve plasty (MVP,n =38) or mitral valve replacement (MVR,n =82) from March 1993 to November 2013.QOL parameters using the validated short form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire were determined before and 6 months after surgery and analyzed with Wilcoxon matched pairs rank test.Results Mean QOL scores for all patients following mitral valve surgery showed clinical and statistically significant improvement in seven of eight QOL parameters,namely (Ⅰ) physical function [post (58 ± 29) vs.pre (41 ± 26),P--0.000]; (]]) role limitation due to physical function [(52 ± 44) vs.(25 ± 27),P =0.000]; (Ⅲ) social function [(76 ± 36) vs.(55 ± 38),P =0.000]; (Ⅳ) role limitation due to emotional problems [(70 ± 45) vs.(40 ± 40),P =0.000]; (Ⅴ) energy [(57 ± 33) vs.(40 ± 30),P =0.000]; (Ⅵ) mental health [(70 ± 24) vs.(61 ± 24),P =0.004]; (Ⅶ) general health perception [(65 ± 29) vs.(52 ± 26),P =0.0003]; but not pain [(70 ± 30) vs.(68 ± 33),P =0.624].Following MVP there was significant improvement in seven of eight QOL parameters and following MVR there was significant improvement in six of eight QOL parameters.Whilst patients with ejection fraction ≥ 50% showed significant improvement in seven of eight QOL parameters,there was significant improvement in any QOL parameters in patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) function.Similarly,patients with mitral regurgitation with end-diastolic dimensions ≥ 50 mm showed significant improvement in any QOL parameters at 6 months follow-up.Conclusions Our study suggested that following mitral valve surgery there was significant improvement in QOL of patients especially in those patients requiring mitral valve repair.However,patients with impaired LV function and those with MR with end-diastolic dimensions ≥ 50 mm were likely to demonstrate a significant improvement in QOL at 6 months follow-up.