安徽卫生职业技术学院学报
安徽衛生職業技術學院學報
안휘위생직업기술학원학보
JOURNAL OF ANHUI HEALTH VOCATIONAL & TECHNICAL COLLEGE
2013年
6期
42-43
,共2页
许萍%杨万春%殷世武%高宗根
許萍%楊萬春%慇世武%高宗根
허평%양만춘%은세무%고종근
大咯血%支气管动脉栓塞%治疗性%垂体后叶素
大咯血%支氣管動脈栓塞%治療性%垂體後葉素
대각혈%지기관동맥전새%치료성%수체후협소
Massive hemoptysis%Bronchial artery embolization%Therapeutic%Pituitrin
目的:探讨大咯血患者在行支气管动脉栓塞(BAE)后联合应用垂体后叶素是否可以提高止血效果。方法:回顾性分析34例大咯血患者的临床资料。根据BAE后是否联合应用垂体后叶素分为联合组和对照组。譹訛联合组:在BAE后将垂体后叶素按0.1U/kg/h剂量持续静脉滴注或静脉泵入。譺訛对照组:BAE后不再应用垂体后叶素及其它止血药物。观察两组患者控制出血的有效率和不良反应。结果:譹訛联合组DSA有12例(63.2%)可见明确的对比剂外溢;全部患者可以见到病变侧支气管动脉增粗扩张,走形迂曲,杂乱;有7例为双侧出血,其余12例为单侧病变。对照组8例(53.3%)有对比剂外溢表现;有5例为双侧病变,另10例为单侧病变。譺訛联合组控制出血的总有效率89.47%,对照组总有效率为60.0%,联合组总有效率显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。譻訛联合组不良反应的发生率高于对照组,但通过对症处理和停药后症状消失。结论:在BAE的基础上联合应用小剂量的垂体后叶素显著减少了再出血风险,提高了BAE的成功率。
目的:探討大咯血患者在行支氣管動脈栓塞(BAE)後聯閤應用垂體後葉素是否可以提高止血效果。方法:迴顧性分析34例大咯血患者的臨床資料。根據BAE後是否聯閤應用垂體後葉素分為聯閤組和對照組。譹訛聯閤組:在BAE後將垂體後葉素按0.1U/kg/h劑量持續靜脈滴註或靜脈泵入。譺訛對照組:BAE後不再應用垂體後葉素及其它止血藥物。觀察兩組患者控製齣血的有效率和不良反應。結果:譹訛聯閤組DSA有12例(63.2%)可見明確的對比劑外溢;全部患者可以見到病變側支氣管動脈增粗擴張,走形迂麯,雜亂;有7例為雙側齣血,其餘12例為單側病變。對照組8例(53.3%)有對比劑外溢錶現;有5例為雙側病變,另10例為單側病變。譺訛聯閤組控製齣血的總有效率89.47%,對照組總有效率為60.0%,聯閤組總有效率顯著優于對照組(P<0.05)。譻訛聯閤組不良反應的髮生率高于對照組,但通過對癥處理和停藥後癥狀消失。結論:在BAE的基礎上聯閤應用小劑量的垂體後葉素顯著減少瞭再齣血風險,提高瞭BAE的成功率。
목적:탐토대각혈환자재행지기관동맥전새(BAE)후연합응용수체후협소시부가이제고지혈효과。방법:회고성분석34례대각혈환자적림상자료。근거BAE후시부연합응용수체후협소분위연합조화대조조。호와연합조:재BAE후장수체후협소안0.1U/kg/h제량지속정맥적주혹정맥빙입。의와대조조:BAE후불재응용수체후협소급기타지혈약물。관찰량조환자공제출혈적유효솔화불량반응。결과:호와연합조DSA유12례(63.2%)가견명학적대비제외일;전부환자가이견도병변측지기관동맥증조확장,주형우곡,잡란;유7례위쌍측출혈,기여12례위단측병변。대조조8례(53.3%)유대비제외일표현;유5례위쌍측병변,령10례위단측병변。의와연합조공제출혈적총유효솔89.47%,대조조총유효솔위60.0%,연합조총유효솔현저우우대조조(P<0.05)。앵와연합조불량반응적발생솔고우대조조,단통과대증처리화정약후증상소실。결론:재BAE적기출상연합응용소제량적수체후협소현저감소료재출혈풍험,제고료BAE적성공솔。
Objective:To investigate efficacy of bronchial artery embolization combined with Pituitrin in the treat-ment of m assive hemoptysis. Methods:the clinical data of 38 patients with massive hemoptysis were retrospectively analyses. The patients were divided into Combined group and Control group according to whether the combined appli-cation of Pituitary and BAE. Combined group was administrated with BAE and Pituitary, and Control group BAE alone. The efficacy and side effect were compared between two groups. Results:①extravasation of contrast were seen in 12 pa-tients(63.2%)in Combined group and 8 patients(53.3%)in Control group on digital subtraction angiography (DSA).②The total efficiency was 89.47% in Combined group and 60% in Control group. There was significantly differen ce ( P<0.05), also, the side effect is higher in Combined group, but it was mild and controllable. Conclusion:the application of small dose Pituitrin combined with BAE may obviously improve the efficiency and reduce the risk of rebleeding.