中医临床研究
中醫臨床研究
중의림상연구
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
6期
74-75
,共2页
盆腔炎%西药%中药灌肠
盆腔炎%西藥%中藥灌腸
분강염%서약%중약관장
Pelvic inflammation%Western medicine%Chinese medicine enema
目的：探讨中药灌肠治疗盆腔炎的疗效。方法：200例盆腔炎的患者，分为A组和B组，各100例。A组给予西药治疗，B组给予中药灌肠治疗，比较两组治疗效果。结果：A组总有效率为79%，B组总有效率为93%（P<0.05），两组不良反应无差异（P>0.05）。结论：中药灌肠治疗妇科盆腔炎可使药物直接作用于病灶，增强药效，且不增加副作用。
目的：探討中藥灌腸治療盆腔炎的療效。方法：200例盆腔炎的患者，分為A組和B組，各100例。A組給予西藥治療，B組給予中藥灌腸治療，比較兩組治療效果。結果：A組總有效率為79%，B組總有效率為93%（P<0.05），兩組不良反應無差異（P>0.05）。結論：中藥灌腸治療婦科盆腔炎可使藥物直接作用于病竈，增彊藥效，且不增加副作用。
목적：탐토중약관장치료분강염적료효。방법：200례분강염적환자，분위A조화B조，각100례。A조급여서약치료，B조급여중약관장치료，비교량조치료효과。결과：A조총유효솔위79%，B조총유효솔위93%（P<0.05），량조불량반응무차이（P>0.05）。결론：중약관장치료부과분강염가사약물직접작용우병조，증강약효，차불증가부작용。
Objective:To explore the effect of Chinese medicine enema in the treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease. Method:200 cases of pelvic inflammation were divided into A group and B group, 100 cases in each. A group was treated with western medicine while B group received the treatment of Chinese medicine enema. Results:The total effective rate of A group was 79%, while that of group B was 93%(P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between adverse reactions of the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion:with the Chinese medicine enema adopted in the treatment of pelvic inflammatory diseases, medicine can act directly on the lesions, which enhances efficacy without causing additional side effects.
