中华医学教育探索杂志
中華醫學教育探索雜誌
중화의학교육탐색잡지
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
2013年
12期
1263-1266
,共4页
黄春基%林海%周建云%尹芃芃%任然%周逸兴%许汝福
黃春基%林海%週建雲%尹芃芃%任然%週逸興%許汝福
황춘기%림해%주건운%윤봉봉%임연%주일흥%허여복
医学硕士研究生%学习习惯%部队学生%地方学生%调查
醫學碩士研究生%學習習慣%部隊學生%地方學生%調查
의학석사연구생%학습습관%부대학생%지방학생%조사
Medical postgraduate%Study habit%Army student%Local student%Survey
目的:了解医学硕士研究生基础课程学习习惯,为基础课程教学方法改革提供依据。方法以我校2010级250名硕士研究生为调查对象,采用自制调查问卷进行调查,内容包括研究生基本情况、学习方法及对教学方法的意见和建议;采用率、百分比和χ2检验对调查数据进行统计分析。结果调查显示,课前不预习和偶尔预习者占91.5%(225/246),课堂记笔记者占93.5%(230/246),简单将笔记记于书上者占78.9%(194/246),希望课件详细者占60.6%(149/246),平时课后复习27.2%(67/246)。地方学生简单记笔记在书上学生的比例86.5%(90/104)高于部队学生73.2%(104/142),差异有统计学意义(P=0.030),而希望课件详细及平时课后复习的比例低于部队学生(P=0.008,P=0.016)。结论研究生课前预习比例较低,学习较依赖教师,课后复习不够及时;军地学生间笔记和复习习惯有差异;要培养研究生良好的课程学习习惯。
目的:瞭解醫學碩士研究生基礎課程學習習慣,為基礎課程教學方法改革提供依據。方法以我校2010級250名碩士研究生為調查對象,採用自製調查問捲進行調查,內容包括研究生基本情況、學習方法及對教學方法的意見和建議;採用率、百分比和χ2檢驗對調查數據進行統計分析。結果調查顯示,課前不預習和偶爾預習者佔91.5%(225/246),課堂記筆記者佔93.5%(230/246),簡單將筆記記于書上者佔78.9%(194/246),希望課件詳細者佔60.6%(149/246),平時課後複習27.2%(67/246)。地方學生簡單記筆記在書上學生的比例86.5%(90/104)高于部隊學生73.2%(104/142),差異有統計學意義(P=0.030),而希望課件詳細及平時課後複習的比例低于部隊學生(P=0.008,P=0.016)。結論研究生課前預習比例較低,學習較依賴教師,課後複習不夠及時;軍地學生間筆記和複習習慣有差異;要培養研究生良好的課程學習習慣。
목적:료해의학석사연구생기출과정학습습관,위기출과정교학방법개혁제공의거。방법이아교2010급250명석사연구생위조사대상,채용자제조사문권진행조사,내용포괄연구생기본정황、학습방법급대교학방법적의견화건의;채용솔、백분비화χ2검험대조사수거진행통계분석。결과조사현시,과전불예습화우이예습자점91.5%(225/246),과당기필기자점93.5%(230/246),간단장필기기우서상자점78.9%(194/246),희망과건상세자점60.6%(149/246),평시과후복습27.2%(67/246)。지방학생간단기필기재서상학생적비례86.5%(90/104)고우부대학생73.2%(104/142),차이유통계학의의(P=0.030),이희망과건상세급평시과후복습적비례저우부대학생(P=0.008,P=0.016)。결론연구생과전예습비례교저,학습교의뢰교사,과후복습불구급시;군지학생간필기화복습습관유차이;요배양연구생량호적과정학습습관。
Objective To understand the study habits of medical postgraduates in basic cours-es so as to provide references for the reformation of teaching methods. Methods Totally 250 postgra-duates of grade 2010 in our university were investigated with self-made questionnaire. The contents of the questionnaire included basic condition of postgraduates, study methods and suggestions for teaching methods. Rate, percentage and Chi-square test were applied to do statistical analysis. Results Accor-ding to the results of the collected 246 copies of questionnaire, 91.5%(225/246) did not preview lessons before class, 93.5%(230/246) took notes in class, 78.9%(194/246) simply took notes in the book, 60.6%(149/246) preferred more detailed courseware and 27.2%(67/246) reviewed lessons after class. The percentage of simply taking notes in the book of local students (86.5%) was significantly higher than that of army ones (73.2%) (P=0.030), but the percentages of preferring more detailed courseware and reviewing lessons after class of local students were significantly lower than those of army ones (P=0.008, P=0.016). Conclusions The proportion of previewing before class is low among postgrauates. Postgraduates depend heavily on teachers and do not review after class in time. There are differences between local students and army students in taking notes and review habits. It is important to cultivate postgraduates’good study habits.