CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨博士研究生发表SCI收录论文的学位政策对于其科研能力培养的激励和导向作用。方法首都医科大学2008至2012年1013名博士研究生共发表1185篇SCI收录论文，将这些SCI期刊的影响因子作为分析对象，采用Excel录入数据，运用SPSS 18.0行多组间方差分析和两组间t检验等，对比不同年度、不同学科、不同培养类型博士研究生发表论文情况， P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。结果发现97.00%的博士研究生能够按学位政策要求发表SCI收录论文；科学学位博士研究生发表SCI收录论文质量高于专业学位博士研究生（P=0.00）；基础学科博士研究生发表SCI收录论文质量高于临床学科博士研究生（P=0.00），差异均有统计学意义。此外，由国家重点学科研究项目支撑的和以共同第一作者形式发表的SCI收录论文的质量较高。结论适宜学位政策对提升博士研究生培养质量起到重要的导向作用，各学位授予单位应根据学科和培养类型的不同，制订更加具体的分类指导政策；包括提高临床医学专业学位博士研究生发表论文要求，完善和规范以共同第一作者发表SCI收录论文的相关学位政策，加强学科综合建设等。
목적：탐토박사연구생발표SCI수록논문적학위정책대우기과연능력배양적격려화도향작용。방법수도의과대학2008지2012년1013명박사연구생공발표1185편SCI수록논문，장저사SCI기간적영향인자작위분석대상，채용Excel록입수거，운용SPSS 18.0행다조간방차분석화량조간t검험등，대비불동년도、불동학과、불동배양류형박사연구생발표논문정황， P<0.05표시차이유통계학의의。결과발현97.00%적박사연구생능구안학위정책요구발표SCI수록논문；과학학위박사연구생발표SCI수록논문질량고우전업학위박사연구생（P=0.00）；기출학과박사연구생발표SCI수록논문질량고우림상학과박사연구생（P=0.00），차이균유통계학의의。차외，유국가중점학과연구항목지탱적화이공동제일작자형식발표적SCI수록논문적질량교고。결론괄의학위정책대제승박사연구생배양질량기도중요적도향작용，각학위수여단위응근거학과화배양류형적불동，제정경가구체적분류지도정책；포괄제고림상의학전업학위박사연구생발표논문요구，완선화규범이공동제일작자발표SCI수록논문적상관학위정책，가강학과종합건설등。
Objective To estimate the incentive and guidance of degree policy for the doctoral student's capacity-building. Methods Totally 1185 published SCI papers completed by 1 013 doc-toral students from 2008 to 2012 in Capital Medical University were filed and impact factors of these SCI journals taken as analysis objects were organized using Microsoft Office Excellsoftware. ANOVA was used for data procession and t-test was used for statistical analysis. P<0.05 signifies statistically significant difference. Results This study showed that 97%doctoral students can complete SCI paper publication in compliance with requirements of doctoral degree policy. Quality of SCI papers of aca-demic degree PhDs was higher than that of professional degree PhDs(P=0.00). Level of SCI papers of PhDs in basic disciplines was higher than that of PhDs in clinical disciplines (P=0.00). In addition, this study found that higher leveled SCI papers originated primarily from the national key disciplines and co-first authors. Conclusions The appropriate degree policies play an important guiding role in enhancing the quality of doctoral students' education. Degree-granting units should make more specific guidance policies according to different types of disciplines and cultures, such as raising published arti-cle requirements to the clinical professional PhDs, improving and standardizing relevant degree poli-cies about SCI papers published by co-first authors, strengthening disciplinary conditions building, etc.