医学临床研究
醫學臨床研究
의학림상연구
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH
2013年
11期
2150-2153
,共4页
戴峥%高军%熊青荣%谢岳云
戴崢%高軍%熊青榮%謝嶽雲
대쟁%고군%웅청영%사악운
前列腺肿瘤%乳腺肿瘤%多发性骨髓瘤
前列腺腫瘤%乳腺腫瘤%多髮性骨髓瘤
전렬선종류%유선종류%다발성골수류
Prostatic Neoplasms%Breast Neoplasms%Multiple Myeloma
[目的]比较全身反转恢复成像(STIR)和全身弥散加权成像(DWI)在全身骨转移瘤评估上相对信号强度的差异。[方法]44例恶性肿瘤患者均行全身 MRI扫描,包括冠状位 T1WI ,STIR 及 DWI(b=800)。每次扫描,经T1 WI确认最多4个最大的病灶,定量计算每一病灶的平均信号强度与背景的比值,对于该感兴趣区(ROI)的STIR和DWI的病灶/背景信号强度进一步进行比较。[结果]有92%(22/24)前列腺癌患者DWI的病灶/背景比值高于STIR(3.91 vs 2.31),差异有显著性( P <0.01)。有86%(6/7)多发骨髓瘤的患者,DWI的病灶/背景高于STIR(7.59 vs 3.70),差异有显著性( P <0.05)。有69%(9/13)乳癌患者, STIR和DWI的病灶/背景接近(4.13 vs 4.26,P >0.05)。[结论]通过测定肿瘤/背景信号比值来研究骨转移瘤MRI成像方法表明,对于前列腺癌和多发骨髓瘤病患而言,DWI在b值=800时较STIR具有更高的显示能力。全身DWI应该用于此类病变的检查当中。
[目的]比較全身反轉恢複成像(STIR)和全身瀰散加權成像(DWI)在全身骨轉移瘤評估上相對信號彊度的差異。[方法]44例噁性腫瘤患者均行全身 MRI掃描,包括冠狀位 T1WI ,STIR 及 DWI(b=800)。每次掃描,經T1 WI確認最多4箇最大的病竈,定量計算每一病竈的平均信號彊度與揹景的比值,對于該感興趣區(ROI)的STIR和DWI的病竈/揹景信號彊度進一步進行比較。[結果]有92%(22/24)前列腺癌患者DWI的病竈/揹景比值高于STIR(3.91 vs 2.31),差異有顯著性( P <0.01)。有86%(6/7)多髮骨髓瘤的患者,DWI的病竈/揹景高于STIR(7.59 vs 3.70),差異有顯著性( P <0.05)。有69%(9/13)乳癌患者, STIR和DWI的病竈/揹景接近(4.13 vs 4.26,P >0.05)。[結論]通過測定腫瘤/揹景信號比值來研究骨轉移瘤MRI成像方法錶明,對于前列腺癌和多髮骨髓瘤病患而言,DWI在b值=800時較STIR具有更高的顯示能力。全身DWI應該用于此類病變的檢查噹中。
[목적]비교전신반전회복성상(STIR)화전신미산가권성상(DWI)재전신골전이류평고상상대신호강도적차이。[방법]44례악성종류환자균행전신 MRI소묘,포괄관상위 T1WI ,STIR 급 DWI(b=800)。매차소묘,경T1 WI학인최다4개최대적병조,정량계산매일병조적평균신호강도여배경적비치,대우해감흥취구(ROI)적STIR화DWI적병조/배경신호강도진일보진행비교。[결과]유92%(22/24)전렬선암환자DWI적병조/배경비치고우STIR(3.91 vs 2.31),차이유현저성( P <0.01)。유86%(6/7)다발골수류적환자,DWI적병조/배경고우STIR(7.59 vs 3.70),차이유현저성( P <0.05)。유69%(9/13)유암환자, STIR화DWI적병조/배경접근(4.13 vs 4.26,P >0.05)。[결론]통과측정종류/배경신호비치래연구골전이류MRI성상방법표명,대우전렬선암화다발골수류병환이언,DWI재b치=800시교STIR구유경고적현시능력。전신DWI응해용우차류병변적검사당중。
[Objective] To compare the difference of the relative signal intensity of whole body bone metas-tasis assessed by whole body short time inversion recovery (STIR) vs diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) .[Meth-ods] All 44 cases received whole-body MRI scans including coronal T1 weighted(T1WI) ,STIR and DWI(b=800) .On each scan ,at most 4 largest bone lesions were identified on T1WI .The ratio of mean signal intensity to background signal intensity of each lesion was calculated .Lesion/background signal intensity ratio on STIR and DWI in the region of interest(ROI) was further compared .[Results] Signal/background ratio on DWI of 22 out of 24 patients with prostate cancer was higher than that on STIR (3 .91 vs 2 .31 ,P <0 .01) .Signal/background ratio on DWI of 6 out of patients with multiple myeloma was higher (7 .59 vs 3 .70 ,P < 0 .05) . Signal/background ratio on DWI of 13 patients with breast cancer was similar to that on DWI (4 .13 vs 4 .26 ,P>0 .05) .[Conclusion]MRI method for bone metastasis by measuring tumor/background signal intensity ratio shows that DWI(b=800) has higher conspicuity than STIR .Whole body DWI should be used in the detection of the lesions .