医学临床研究
醫學臨床研究
의학림상연구
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RESEARCH
2013年
11期
2103-2105
,共3页
张丽峰%鲍杨%贺广宝%史东平
張麗峰%鮑楊%賀廣寶%史東平
장려봉%포양%하엄보%사동평
[目的]主要探讨静脉麻醉不同配伍方式与苏醒期躁动的关系。[方法]选择静脉全麻下行无痛胃镜检查术的患者300例,随机分为三组:丙泊酚+芬太尼组(PF组)、丙泊酚+瑞芬太尼组(PR组)、丙泊酚+舒芬太尼组(PS组),各组均100例。记录用药前、用药后、胃镜退出时平均动脉压(MAP)、脉搏氧饱和度(SpO2),胃镜退出后观察躁动发生情况,并按镇静躁动分级法对其苏醒状况进行评分。[结果]苏醒期躁动的发生率分别为:PR组39%(39/100)、PS组11%(11/100)、PF组17%(17/100)。PR组与 PS组及 PF组相比,躁动发生率均显著增高(P≤0.01),而PS组与PF组相比则无显著差异(P>0.05)。PR组低氧血症发生率(11%)明显高于PS组(1%)与PF组(2%),差异均有显著性(P<0.01)。[结论]丙泊酚+芬太尼组及丙泊酚+舒芬太尼组苏醒期躁动发生率和低氧血症发生率明显低于丙泊酚+瑞芬太尼组,为静脉全麻较好配伍方式。
[目的]主要探討靜脈痳醉不同配伍方式與囌醒期躁動的關繫。[方法]選擇靜脈全痳下行無痛胃鏡檢查術的患者300例,隨機分為三組:丙泊酚+芬太尼組(PF組)、丙泊酚+瑞芬太尼組(PR組)、丙泊酚+舒芬太尼組(PS組),各組均100例。記錄用藥前、用藥後、胃鏡退齣時平均動脈壓(MAP)、脈搏氧飽和度(SpO2),胃鏡退齣後觀察躁動髮生情況,併按鎮靜躁動分級法對其囌醒狀況進行評分。[結果]囌醒期躁動的髮生率分彆為:PR組39%(39/100)、PS組11%(11/100)、PF組17%(17/100)。PR組與 PS組及 PF組相比,躁動髮生率均顯著增高(P≤0.01),而PS組與PF組相比則無顯著差異(P>0.05)。PR組低氧血癥髮生率(11%)明顯高于PS組(1%)與PF組(2%),差異均有顯著性(P<0.01)。[結論]丙泊酚+芬太尼組及丙泊酚+舒芬太尼組囌醒期躁動髮生率和低氧血癥髮生率明顯低于丙泊酚+瑞芬太尼組,為靜脈全痳較好配伍方式。
[목적]주요탐토정맥마취불동배오방식여소성기조동적관계。[방법]선택정맥전마하행무통위경검사술적환자300례,수궤분위삼조:병박분+분태니조(PF조)、병박분+서분태니조(PR조)、병박분+서분태니조(PS조),각조균100례。기록용약전、용약후、위경퇴출시평균동맥압(MAP)、맥박양포화도(SpO2),위경퇴출후관찰조동발생정황,병안진정조동분급법대기소성상황진행평분。[결과]소성기조동적발생솔분별위:PR조39%(39/100)、PS조11%(11/100)、PF조17%(17/100)。PR조여 PS조급 PF조상비,조동발생솔균현저증고(P≤0.01),이PS조여PF조상비칙무현저차이(P>0.05)。PR조저양혈증발생솔(11%)명현고우PS조(1%)여PF조(2%),차이균유현저성(P<0.01)。[결론]병박분+분태니조급병박분+서분태니조소성기조동발생솔화저양혈증발생솔명현저우병박분+서분태니조,위정맥전마교호배오방식。
[Objective] To explore the relationship between different combined intravenous anesthesia methods and agitation in recovery period .[Methods]Totally 300 patients undergoing painless gastroscopy un-der intravenous anesthesia were chosen and randomly divided into propofol + fentanyl group (group PF) , propofol+remifentanil group(group PR) and propofol+sufentanil group(PS) with 100 patients in each group . Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pulse oxygen saturation(SpO2 ) before and after administration and at gas-troscope withdrawal were recorded .The incidence of agitation after gastroscope withdrawal was observed .The sedation agitation classification method was used to assess the recovery status .[Results] The incidence of agi-tation of group PR ,group PS and group PF in recovery period were 39% (39/100) ,11% (11/100) and 17%(17/100) ,respectively .Compared with group PS and group PF ,the incidence of agitation in group PR was significantly increased ( P≤0 .01) ,but there was no significant difference between group PS and group PF ( P>0 .05) .The incidence of hypoxemia in group PR (11% ) was obviously higher than that in group PS (1% ) and group PF(2% ) ,and there was significant difference( P <0 .01) .[Conclusion]The incidence of agitation and hypoxemia in propofol+fentanyl group and propofol+ sufentanil group in recovery period were lower than that in propofol+ remifentanil group ,so it provides a good combined intravenous anesthesia method .