水利学报
水利學報
수리학보
2013年
12期
1409-1419
,共11页
肖恒%陆桂华%吴志勇%刘志雨
肖恆%陸桂華%吳誌勇%劉誌雨
초항%륙계화%오지용%류지우
气候变化%RCP4.5%CMIP5%珠江流域%VIC模型%洪峰流量%洪水总量%趋势
氣候變化%RCP4.5%CMIP5%珠江流域%VIC模型%洪峰流量%洪水總量%趨勢
기후변화%RCP4.5%CMIP5%주강류역%VIC모형%홍봉류량%홍수총량%추세
climate change%RCP4.5%CMIP5%the Pearl River basin%VIC model%flood peak%flood vol-ume%trends
从第5次耦合模式比较计划(CMIP5)的47个全球气候模式中,根据模式对珠江流域降水模拟的相似性,筛选出5个相对独立的模式,耦合大尺度水文模型(VIC模型)模拟了21个主要干支流控制站日流量过程。以洪峰流量和洪水总量为指标,评估了IPCC RCP4.5情景下未来30年洪水对气候变化的响应。结果表明:2011-2040年洪峰流量和洪水总量在西江和粤西桂南沿海诸河可能呈增加趋势;而在北江(洪水总量)和东江多半可能呈减少趋势。与1970-1999年相比,郁江、桂江、东江及粤西桂南沿海诸河特大洪水可能呈增加趋势,红水河和北江多半可能呈增加趋势;柳江则可能或多半可能呈减少趋势。西江洪水与红水河、郁江关系将更为密切,北江与西江及红水河与柳江洪水遭遇的情况多半可能增加。
從第5次耦閤模式比較計劃(CMIP5)的47箇全毬氣候模式中,根據模式對珠江流域降水模擬的相似性,篩選齣5箇相對獨立的模式,耦閤大呎度水文模型(VIC模型)模擬瞭21箇主要榦支流控製站日流量過程。以洪峰流量和洪水總量為指標,評估瞭IPCC RCP4.5情景下未來30年洪水對氣候變化的響應。結果錶明:2011-2040年洪峰流量和洪水總量在西江和粵西桂南沿海諸河可能呈增加趨勢;而在北江(洪水總量)和東江多半可能呈減少趨勢。與1970-1999年相比,鬱江、桂江、東江及粵西桂南沿海諸河特大洪水可能呈增加趨勢,紅水河和北江多半可能呈增加趨勢;柳江則可能或多半可能呈減少趨勢。西江洪水與紅水河、鬱江關繫將更為密切,北江與西江及紅水河與柳江洪水遭遇的情況多半可能增加。
종제5차우합모식비교계화(CMIP5)적47개전구기후모식중,근거모식대주강류역강수모의적상사성,사선출5개상대독립적모식,우합대척도수문모형(VIC모형)모의료21개주요간지류공제참일류량과정。이홍봉류량화홍수총량위지표,평고료IPCC RCP4.5정경하미래30년홍수대기후변화적향응。결과표명:2011-2040년홍봉류량화홍수총량재서강화월서계남연해제하가능정증가추세;이재북강(홍수총량)화동강다반가능정감소추세。여1970-1999년상비,욱강、계강、동강급월서계남연해제하특대홍수가능정증가추세,홍수하화북강다반가능정증가추세;류강칙가능혹다반가능정감소추세。서강홍수여홍수하、욱강관계장경위밀절,북강여서강급홍수하여류강홍수조우적정황다반가능증가。
Based on five relative independent global climate models from the multi-model ensemble of 47 global climate models within World Climate Research Program’s Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) and the VIC (Variable Infiltration Capacity) model, flood response to climate change in the Pearl River basin under the new Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) representative con-centration pathways (RCPs) 4.5 scenario for the next three decades was assessed in this study. The results show that upward trends are likely detected on the results of Mann-Kendall test at most gauges in the Xiji-ang River and the coastal various rivers during 2011-2040, and downward trends are more likely than not found in the North River (for the annual maximum 15d mean stream flow series) and the East River dur-ing that period. But most of these trends are not significant. Relative to the baseline period (1970-1999), the projected extraordinary flood would be likely increased in the Yujiang River, the Guijiang River, the West River and the coastal various rivers, and in the Hongshuihe River and the North River, there are more likely than not to increase. Only in the Liujiang River, the projected extraordinary flood would be likely or more likely than not to decrease. The source of flood at Gaoyao gauge would be likely more relat-ed to the Hongshuihe River and the Yujiang River. Flood encountering risk would be more likely than not to increase for the North River and the West River, and that is also found for the Hongshuihe River and the Liujiang River.