CAJ | 학술논문

自1982年以来，以三个“五年改革纲要”的制定为标志，我国进行了三次司法改革。三次改革取得了丰富的成果，但也存在改革的“依据不足”的困境，改革的推进缺乏必要的法律依据予以支持。为此，我国司法改革的推进，应当以选择“法律”而非“制度”为突破口，从法律规范的层面推进司法改革，统合现有的司法法资源，制定统一的《司法基本法》；在此基础上，以统一的《司法基本法》为依据，推动司法改革的整体深化。制定后的统一《司法基本法》，在内容上以宪法为依据，将宪法中的司法制度与司法的基本规则予以具体化，在位阶上属于基本法律的地位，具有高于普通法律的地位，因而能够全面回应司法改革对法治资源的需求，确保司法改革在法律的框架内有序行进。
자1982년이래，이삼개“오년개혁강요”적제정위표지，아국진행료삼차사법개혁。삼차개혁취득료봉부적성과，단야존재개혁적“의거불족”적곤경，개혁적추진결핍필요적법률의거여이지지。위차，아국사법개혁적추진，응당이선택“법률”이비“제도”위돌파구，종법률규범적층면추진사법개혁，통합현유적사법법자원，제정통일적《사법기본법》；재차기출상，이통일적《사법기본법》위의거，추동사법개혁적정체심화。제정후적통일《사법기본법》，재내용상이헌법위의거，장헌법중적사법제도여사법적기본규칙여이구체화，재위계상속우기본법률적지위，구유고우보통법률적지위，인이능구전면회응사법개혁대법치자원적수구，학보사법개혁재법률적광가내유서행진。
Our country has undergone three drastic tides of judicial reforms since 1982,taking the formu-lating of the three Reform Program for Five Years as landmarks.These three judicial reforms achieved fruitful results,but meanwhile encountered the difficulties of lack of legal basis,unable to be supported by existing le-gal norms.So Judicial reform should take Legislation rather than system reforming as breach,integrate existing resources of Judiciary law and formulate The Basic Act ofJudicature.On this basis,Judicial reform ought to be carried out under the framework of The Basic Act ofJudicature.The Basic Act ofJudicature created must be in accordance with the constitution and specifying judicial system and basic judicial rule on Constitution,which has higher legal authority than common law,so as to responded to judicial reform for demand for good law re-sources,ensuring that judicial reform was carried out within the legal framework.