CAJ | 학술논문

目的探讨胸腔镜手术疗效及在基层医院开展的可行性。方法收集反应手术疗效的相关指标,比较胸腔镜手术组与传统开胸手术组的差异,评价基层医院开展胸腔镜手术的可行性。结果全组手术时间(100.75±22.72) min,术中出血量(54.27±26.21) mL,术后引流量(920.67±171.99) mL。胸腔镜手术组术后并发症少、住院时间短,且切口操作时间短( P=0.000)、疼痛评分低(P=0.000),基层医院有能力开展此技术。结论胸腔镜手术疗效好,在基层医院开展具有可行性。
목적탐토흉강경수술료효급재기층의원개전적가행성。방법수집반응수술료효적상관지표,비교흉강경수술조여전통개흉수술조적차이,평개기층의원개전흉강경수술적가행성。결과전조수술시간(100.75±22.72) min,술중출혈량(54.27±26.21) mL,술후인류량(920.67±171.99) mL。흉강경수술조술후병발증소、주원시간단,차절구조작시간단( P=0.000)、동통평분저(P=0.000),기층의원유능력개전차기술。결론흉강경수술료효호,재기층의원개전구유가행성。
Objective To investigate the effect of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery( VATS) in thoracic disease,and the feasibility to carry out VATS for basic hospital. Methods The data of VATS treatment were collected to compare the differences between study group and control group,and evaluate the the feasibility to carry out VATS for basic hospital. Results The operation time was (100. 75±22. 72) min, blood loss was (54. 27±26. 21) mL,postoperative drainage was (920. 67±171. 99) mL. The postoperative complications were fewer,post-operative hospital stay was shorter,incision time was shorter(P=0. 000) and pain scores was lower(P=0. 000) in study group than that in control group. Basic hospital has the capacity to conduct this technical. Conclusion VATS is feasible to carry out in basic hospital.