丽水学院学报
麗水學院學報
려수학원학보
JOURNAL OF LISHUI UNIVERSITY
2014年
3期
42-46
,共5页
证人出庭%强制出庭%机制改革
證人齣庭%彊製齣庭%機製改革
증인출정%강제출정%궤제개혁
witness attendance%compulsory attendance%system reform
我国的证人出庭制度似乎变成了证人不出庭制度:被告人认罪的案件实行简化审理,证人很少出庭;即使在普通程序中,法律也不要求所有证人一律出庭。对于仅剩的需要证人出庭的案件,却存在着无法强制证人作证的问题:由于律师无法对尚不存在的证人证言提出异议,启动法院强制证人出庭的权力变得不切实际;而特定近亲属享有免于出庭作证的特权,法院无法强制其出庭。需要肯定证人出庭制度的价值,并在此基础上实行机制改革,赋予被告人审前充分的质证机会、扩大适用认罪案件程序、将证言分为尚未取得和已经取得两种情形以及将特定近亲属的免于出庭作证特权改为拒绝作证特权。
我國的證人齣庭製度似乎變成瞭證人不齣庭製度:被告人認罪的案件實行簡化審理,證人很少齣庭;即使在普通程序中,法律也不要求所有證人一律齣庭。對于僅剩的需要證人齣庭的案件,卻存在著無法彊製證人作證的問題:由于律師無法對尚不存在的證人證言提齣異議,啟動法院彊製證人齣庭的權力變得不切實際;而特定近親屬享有免于齣庭作證的特權,法院無法彊製其齣庭。需要肯定證人齣庭製度的價值,併在此基礎上實行機製改革,賦予被告人審前充分的質證機會、擴大適用認罪案件程序、將證言分為尚未取得和已經取得兩種情形以及將特定近親屬的免于齣庭作證特權改為拒絕作證特權。
아국적증인출정제도사호변성료증인불출정제도:피고인인죄적안건실행간화심리,증인흔소출정;즉사재보통정서중,법률야불요구소유증인일률출정。대우부잉적수요증인출정적안건,각존재착무법강제증인작증적문제:유우률사무법대상불존재적증인증언제출이의,계동법원강제증인출정적권력변득불절실제;이특정근친속향유면우출정작증적특권,법원무법강제기출정。수요긍정증인출정제도적개치,병재차기출상실행궤제개혁,부여피고인심전충분적질증궤회、확대괄용인죄안건정서、장증언분위상미취득화이경취득량충정형이급장특정근친속적면우출정작증특권개위거절작증특권。
Chinese witness attendance system seems to be witness non-attendance system: cases in which the defendant pleads guilty are tried simply with witnesses rarely attending the court; even in ordinary procedure, the law does not require all witnesses to attend the court. To those cases where witness attendance is necessary,some witnesses can not be compelled to attend the court due to the following reasons: on the one hand,it is impractical for the court to compel the witness to attend the court since the attorney can not challenge non-existing testimony;on the other,certain close relatives enjoy the privilege of not attending the court. It is necessary first to confirm the value of witness attendance system and then reform the system: the defendant shaould be given the prior opportunity to cross-examine;procedures applicable to cases where the defendant pleads guilty should get expanded; two types of testimonies---the ones that have been made and the ones have not been made should be differentiated; the relative nonattendance privilege should be replaced by the privilege of not testifying.