CAJ | 학술논문

大型构件隔声量的实验室测量有两种方法：一种是传统的隔声室测量方法，可参照国家标准GB/T 19889.3-2005；另一种可称之为声强法，可参照国际标准ISO 15186-1：2000。参照以上两种方法，分别测量了三块板的隔声量。结果发现，在中高频段，两种方法测量结果几乎一致，而在低频段(300Hz以下)，声强扫描法测量结果明显低于传统方法。为了找出造成低频段测量结果差异的原因，还研究了吸声材料、探头间距等因素对测量结果的影响。
대형구건격성량적실험실측량유량충방법：일충시전통적격성실측량방법，가삼조국가표준GB/T 19889.3-2005；령일충가칭지위성강법，가삼조국제표준ISO 15186-1：2000。삼조이상량충방법，분별측량료삼괴판적격성량。결과발현，재중고빈단，량충방법측량결과궤호일치，이재저빈단(300Hz이하)，성강소묘법측량결과명현저우전통방법。위료조출조성저빈단측량결과차이적원인，환연구료흡성재료、탐두간거등인소대측량결과적영향。
There are two methods for measuring the sound reduction index (SRI) of large partitions. One is a conven-tional method which requires a sound proof chamber by reference to GB/T 19889.3-2005;the other is called sound in-tensity method by reference to ISO 15186-1:2000. The SRIs of three panels are measured according to these two me-thods. The results indicate that the SRI is almost consistent with the two methods in the middle and high frequency re-gion. When the frequency is below 400 Hz, the SRI measured by sound intensity method is less than that measured by the conventional method. The effects of sound absorbing materials and the distance of spacers used in sound intensity probe are also investigated.