现代临床护理
現代臨床護理
현대림상호리
MODERN CLINICAL NURSING
2013年
12期
18-22
,共5页
胡雯%范育英%邵红岩%陈秋燕%麦海强
鬍雯%範育英%邵紅巖%陳鞦燕%麥海彊
호문%범육영%소홍암%진추연%맥해강
鼻咽癌%奈达铂%顺铂%放疗%化疗%毒副反应%护理
鼻嚥癌%奈達鉑%順鉑%放療%化療%毒副反應%護理
비인암%내체박%순박%방료%화료%독부반응%호리
nasopharyngeal carcinoma%nedaplatin%cisplatin%chemotherapy%radiotherapy adverse reaction%nursing
目的:对比分析奈达铂(nedaplatin,NDP)治疗方案和顺铂(cisplatin,DDP)治疗方案在同步放化疗治疗局部区域晚期鼻咽癌毒副反应,并总结护理要点。方法选择本科室2012年3月~2013年3月收治的局部区域晚期鼻咽癌患者112例,采.用区组随机的方法由电脑产生随机号,根据患者临床分期分层分为试验组(NDP+放疗)56例,对照组(DDP+放疗)56例。两组均采.用调强放射治疗,试验组为NDP 100 mg/m2静脉滴注;对照组为DDP 100 mg/m2静脉滴注,放疗期每3周1次(放疗第1天,第22天,第43天),共3个疗程。比较两组患者治疗效果及治疗期间毒副反应发生情况。结果治疗结束时试验组和对照组患者肿瘤完全缓解率分别为87.5%和85.7%(P>0.05)。试验组患者胃肠道反应、口腔黏膜炎严重程度明显轻于对照组(均P<0.05),血小板下降试验组明显高于对照组(P<0.05),在白细胞下降、肝肾功能损害方面比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 NDP联合放疗治疗局部区域晚期鼻咽癌相对DDP联合放疗的毒副反应少,患者易于接受,生活质量有所提高。在应.用两种化疗方案时,应关注患者毒副反应的发生情况,有所侧重地给予针对性的护理。
目的:對比分析奈達鉑(nedaplatin,NDP)治療方案和順鉑(cisplatin,DDP)治療方案在同步放化療治療跼部區域晚期鼻嚥癌毒副反應,併總結護理要點。方法選擇本科室2012年3月~2013年3月收治的跼部區域晚期鼻嚥癌患者112例,採.用區組隨機的方法由電腦產生隨機號,根據患者臨床分期分層分為試驗組(NDP+放療)56例,對照組(DDP+放療)56例。兩組均採.用調彊放射治療,試驗組為NDP 100 mg/m2靜脈滴註;對照組為DDP 100 mg/m2靜脈滴註,放療期每3週1次(放療第1天,第22天,第43天),共3箇療程。比較兩組患者治療效果及治療期間毒副反應髮生情況。結果治療結束時試驗組和對照組患者腫瘤完全緩解率分彆為87.5%和85.7%(P>0.05)。試驗組患者胃腸道反應、口腔黏膜炎嚴重程度明顯輕于對照組(均P<0.05),血小闆下降試驗組明顯高于對照組(P<0.05),在白細胞下降、肝腎功能損害方麵比較,差異無統計學意義(均P>0.05)。結論 NDP聯閤放療治療跼部區域晚期鼻嚥癌相對DDP聯閤放療的毒副反應少,患者易于接受,生活質量有所提高。在應.用兩種化療方案時,應關註患者毒副反應的髮生情況,有所側重地給予針對性的護理。
목적:대비분석내체박(nedaplatin,NDP)치료방안화순박(cisplatin,DDP)치료방안재동보방화료치료국부구역만기비인암독부반응,병총결호리요점。방법선택본과실2012년3월~2013년3월수치적국부구역만기비인암환자112례,채.용구조수궤적방법유전뇌산생수궤호,근거환자림상분기분층분위시험조(NDP+방료)56례,대조조(DDP+방료)56례。량조균채.용조강방사치료,시험조위NDP 100 mg/m2정맥적주;대조조위DDP 100 mg/m2정맥적주,방료기매3주1차(방료제1천,제22천,제43천),공3개료정。비교량조환자치료효과급치료기간독부반응발생정황。결과치료결속시시험조화대조조환자종류완전완해솔분별위87.5%화85.7%(P>0.05)。시험조환자위장도반응、구강점막염엄중정도명현경우대조조(균P<0.05),혈소판하강시험조명현고우대조조(P<0.05),재백세포하강、간신공능손해방면비교,차이무통계학의의(균P>0.05)。결론 NDP연합방료치료국부구역만기비인암상대DDP연합방료적독부반응소,환자역우접수,생활질량유소제고。재응.용량충화료방안시,응관주환자독부반응적발생정황,유소측중지급여침대성적호리。
Objectives To analyze comparatively the adverse reactions of Nedaplatin(NDP)and Cisplatin(DDP)in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and summarize the nursing points as well.Methods From March 2012 to March 2013,112 patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma were randomly divided into NDP group and DDP group.Besides intensity modulated radiotherapy for both groups,NDP group were treated with intravenous drop infusion of NDP by 100 mg/m2 and the control group with intravenous drop infusion of DDP by 100 mg/m2 both for three courses of once every three weeks (e.g.day one,day 22 and day 43 during the course).The two groups were compared in terms of therapeutic effects and incidences of adverse reactions.Results The complete remission rates of the NDP group and DDP group were 87.5%and 85.7%,respectively (P>0.05).The incidences of adverse reactions like gastrointestinal reactions and radioactive mucositis in the NDP group were significantly lower than those in the DDP group(P<0.05)and the index of platelet decrease was significantly higher(P<0.05).There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of liver and kidney dysfunction and white blood cells decrease(P>0.05). Conclusions Chemotherapy with NDP combined with radiotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma has fewer adverse effects and is easy to be accepted by patients so that their quality of life can be improved.In the application of the two kinds of chemotherapy,we should pay attention to the adverse reactions on patients in order to give pertinent care.