当代医学
噹代醫學
당대의학
CHINA CONTEMPORARY MEDICINE
2014年
11期
1-2
,共2页
胡淑霞%梅丽%王志慧%官咏兰
鬍淑霞%梅麗%王誌慧%官詠蘭
호숙하%매려%왕지혜%관영란
家庭病床%前置胎盘%期待治疗%阴道流血
傢庭病床%前置胎盤%期待治療%陰道流血
가정병상%전치태반%기대치료%음도류혈
Family ward%Placenta previa%Expectant treatment%Colporrhagia
目的:探讨家庭病床处理前置胎盘期待疗法的安全性和效果。方法选择2010年1月~2012年12月广东省海珠区妇幼保健院妇产科收治的70例妊娠28~34周单胎妊娠因首次阴道流血入院期待治疗的边缘性、部分性前置胎盘孕妇为研究对象,病情稳定后随机均分为家庭病床组和住院治疗组(n=35),继续进行期待治疗。比较2组孕妇期待治疗的天数、期待治疗住院天数、阴道再次流血次数、孕妇输血率、新生儿出生体重、阿氏评分。结果家庭病床组和住院治疗组分别有1例和2例期待治疗期间因复查B超检查证实胎盘上移为正常位置而剔出研究。2组期待治疗的时间、阴道再次流血次数、孕妇输血率、新生儿出生体重、阿氏评分等比较,差异均无统计学意义。家庭病床组和住院治疗组期待治疗平均住院天数分别是(3.56±2.64)d和(22.69±5.47)d,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论家庭病床处理前置胎盘期待疗法安全、有效,对孕期合并前置胎盘的孕妇可行家庭病床期待治疗。
目的:探討傢庭病床處理前置胎盤期待療法的安全性和效果。方法選擇2010年1月~2012年12月廣東省海珠區婦幼保健院婦產科收治的70例妊娠28~34週單胎妊娠因首次陰道流血入院期待治療的邊緣性、部分性前置胎盤孕婦為研究對象,病情穩定後隨機均分為傢庭病床組和住院治療組(n=35),繼續進行期待治療。比較2組孕婦期待治療的天數、期待治療住院天數、陰道再次流血次數、孕婦輸血率、新生兒齣生體重、阿氏評分。結果傢庭病床組和住院治療組分彆有1例和2例期待治療期間因複查B超檢查證實胎盤上移為正常位置而剔齣研究。2組期待治療的時間、陰道再次流血次數、孕婦輸血率、新生兒齣生體重、阿氏評分等比較,差異均無統計學意義。傢庭病床組和住院治療組期待治療平均住院天數分彆是(3.56±2.64)d和(22.69±5.47)d,2組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。結論傢庭病床處理前置胎盤期待療法安全、有效,對孕期閤併前置胎盤的孕婦可行傢庭病床期待治療。
목적:탐토가정병상처리전치태반기대요법적안전성화효과。방법선택2010년1월~2012년12월광동성해주구부유보건원부산과수치적70례임신28~34주단태임신인수차음도류혈입원기대치료적변연성、부분성전치태반잉부위연구대상,병정은정후수궤균분위가정병상조화주원치료조(n=35),계속진행기대치료。비교2조잉부기대치료적천수、기대치료주원천수、음도재차류혈차수、잉부수혈솔、신생인출생체중、아씨평분。결과가정병상조화주원치료조분별유1례화2례기대치료기간인복사B초검사증실태반상이위정상위치이척출연구。2조기대치료적시간、음도재차류혈차수、잉부수혈솔、신생인출생체중、아씨평분등비교,차이균무통계학의의。가정병상조화주원치료조기대치료평균주원천수분별시(3.56±2.64)d화(22.69±5.47)d,2조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。결론가정병상처리전치태반기대요법안전、유효,대잉기합병전치태반적잉부가행가정병상기대치료。
Objective To study the safety and efficacy of expectant treatment of placenta previa by family ward management. Methods Seventy pregnant women of 28-34 gestational weeks with partial and marginal placenta praevia who received expectant treatment because of vaginal bleeding from Jan 2010 to Dec 2012 were randomly divided into family ward group and inpatient treatment group. Each group had 35 patients. The time of expectant treatment,average hospitalization days of expectant treatment,number of vaginal bleeding,the rate of blood transfusion,neonatal birth weight and apgar scores between two groups were compared. Results One and two patients were excluded out the research in family ward group and inpatient treatment group respectively for regaining the normal place of placenta conformed by follow-up ultrasound examination. There was no significant difference in the time of expectant treatment,number of vaginal bleeding,the rate of blood transfusion,neonatal birth weight and apgar scores between the two groups. The average days of hospitalization were expectant treatment between family bed group and treatment group hospitalization, respectively (3.56±2.64) and (22.69±5.47) days, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). Conclusion Family ward management for placenta praevia is safe and effective. For those appropriate placenta praevia patients can be treated by family ward.