心血管病防治知识（下半月）
心血管病防治知識（下半月）
심혈관병방치지식（하반월）
XINXUEGUANBING FANGZHI ZHISHI
2014年
1期
1-3
,共3页
颈动脉狭窄%缺血性脑血管病%诊断%治疗
頸動脈狹窄%缺血性腦血管病%診斷%治療
경동맥협착%결혈성뇌혈관병%진단%치료
Carotid stenosis%Ischemic cerebrovascular disease%Diagnosis%Treatment
目的：探讨由颈动脉狭窄引发缺血性脑血管病患者临床正确诊断与治疗方法，为提高此类患者疗效提供可靠依据，保障患者生活质量与生命安全。方法对35例由颈动脉狭窄引发缺血性脑血管病患者临床资料进行回顾性分析，内容包括患者诊断方法、治疗方法、治疗效果等，对所得资料进行统计，得出结论。本文35例患者均采用氯吡格雷联合辛伐他汀药物保守治疗，若患者患有高血压、糖尿病等原发疾病，则应给予针对性的疾病控制措施。结果35例颈动脉狭窄引发缺血性脑血管病患者均采用药物治疗（100.00%），且有效率高达100.00%，经随访6个月可知，仅8.57%患者发生再狭窄情况，临床治疗效果较为满意。结论临床医师应根据缺血性脑血管疾病患者实际情况及各项临床检查结果进行综合判断，从而确诊发病原因并制定正确治疗方案，提高患者治疗效果，保障其生活质量及生命安全。
目的：探討由頸動脈狹窄引髮缺血性腦血管病患者臨床正確診斷與治療方法，為提高此類患者療效提供可靠依據，保障患者生活質量與生命安全。方法對35例由頸動脈狹窄引髮缺血性腦血管病患者臨床資料進行迴顧性分析，內容包括患者診斷方法、治療方法、治療效果等，對所得資料進行統計，得齣結論。本文35例患者均採用氯吡格雷聯閤辛伐他汀藥物保守治療，若患者患有高血壓、糖尿病等原髮疾病，則應給予針對性的疾病控製措施。結果35例頸動脈狹窄引髮缺血性腦血管病患者均採用藥物治療（100.00%），且有效率高達100.00%，經隨訪6箇月可知，僅8.57%患者髮生再狹窄情況，臨床治療效果較為滿意。結論臨床醫師應根據缺血性腦血管疾病患者實際情況及各項臨床檢查結果進行綜閤判斷，從而確診髮病原因併製定正確治療方案，提高患者治療效果，保障其生活質量及生命安全。
목적：탐토유경동맥협착인발결혈성뇌혈관병환자림상정학진단여치료방법，위제고차류환자료효제공가고의거，보장환자생활질량여생명안전。방법대35례유경동맥협착인발결혈성뇌혈관병환자림상자료진행회고성분석，내용포괄환자진단방법、치료방법、치료효과등，대소득자료진행통계，득출결론。본문35례환자균채용록필격뢰연합신벌타정약물보수치료，약환자환유고혈압、당뇨병등원발질병，칙응급여침대성적질병공제조시。결과35례경동맥협착인발결혈성뇌혈관병환자균채용약물치료（100.00%），차유효솔고체100.00%，경수방6개월가지，부8.57%환자발생재협착정황，림상치료효과교위만의。결론림상의사응근거결혈성뇌혈관질병환자실제정황급각항림상검사결과진행종합판단，종이학진발병원인병제정정학치료방안，제고환자치료효과，보장기생활질량급생명안전。
Objective To investigate the proper clinical diagnosis and treatment of ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICD) caused by carotid stenosis, and to provide a reliable basis for improving the treatment outcome of the patients with this disease and ensure their quality of life and life safety. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 35 patients with ICD caused by carotid stenosis, including diagnostic method, treatment method, and treatment outcome. The obtained data were statistically analyzed. All patients received conservative treatment with clopidogrel plus simvastatin; those with hypertension, diabetes, and other primary diseases were given specific intervention for disease control. Results All the 35 patients (100%) with ICD caused by carotid stenosis received medication, with a response rate of 100.00%. Six months of follow-up showed that only 8.57% of them had restenosis, with a satisfactory clinical effect. ConclusionClinicians should make comprehensive judgment according to the actual condition of ICD patients and their clinical examination results to identify the cause of disease and make the proper treatment plan, thus improving the treatment outcome of patients and ensuring their quality of life and life safety.
