CAJ | 학술논문

刑事判决说理机制是刑事诉讼尤其是刑事审判中的关键一环，它不仅关系到被告人的知情权，更是一国刑事法治运作公开公正的体现。但是，在现有关于刑事判决说理机制的研究中，缺少以实证方法作为指导的研究。有鉴于此，本文选取了最高人民法院公布的六个指导性案例，通过对判决理由部分字数的统计分析，认为判决说理的程度与案件的复杂性以及控辩双方对抗程度有关，而与犯罪的严重程度、审级的高低无涉。
형사판결설리궤제시형사소송우기시형사심판중적관건일배，타불부관계도피고인적지정권，경시일국형사법치운작공개공정적체현。단시，재현유관우형사판결설리궤제적연구중，결소이실증방법작위지도적연구。유감우차，본문선취료최고인민법원공포적륙개지도성안례，통과대판결이유부분자수적통계분석，인위판결설리적정도여안건적복잡성이급공변쌍방대항정도유관，이여범죄적엄중정도、심급적고저무섭。
Criminal judgment reasoning mechanism is a key step in the criminal trial,as it not only concerns the defendant′s right to know,but also is an embodiment of the open and fair operation of criminal law in a country.However,in the existing re-search about criminal judgment reasoning mechanism,there are few empirical studies.In view of this situation,the paper selects six published guiding cases of the Supreme People′s Court and makes a statistical analysis of the reasoning words in their decision making part.It is found that the degree of judgment reasoning is related to the complexity of the cases and the degree of the con-frontation,but not the degree of severity of the crime and the level of the trial.