国际检验医学杂志
國際檢驗醫學雜誌
국제검험의학잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE
2014年
2期
226-227
,共2页
泌尿道感染%细菌学技术%敏感性与特异性
泌尿道感染%細菌學技術%敏感性與特異性
비뇨도감염%세균학기술%민감성여특이성
urinary tract infection%bacteriological techniques%sensitivity and specificity
目的:探讨FUS-200全自动尿液分析系统(简称FUS-200)对快速筛检尿路感染的应用价值。方法以FUS-200和常规细菌培养法对268例尿标本分别进行检测并比较分析,以细菌培养结果为标准对照,评估FUS-200细菌定量计数对筛检尿路感染的灵敏度和特异性等。结果采用FUS-200对尿液细菌计数与常规细菌培养法检测结果比较分析,灵敏度为51.7%;特异性为88.9%,阳性预测值为57.4%,阴性预测值为86.4%。结论采用FUS-200筛检尿路感染,比常规尿液细菌培养更快速,尤其对阴性结果具有高度的预见性,可给临床提供是否有细菌感染的参考信息,但不可代替常规细菌培养。
目的:探討FUS-200全自動尿液分析繫統(簡稱FUS-200)對快速篩檢尿路感染的應用價值。方法以FUS-200和常規細菌培養法對268例尿標本分彆進行檢測併比較分析,以細菌培養結果為標準對照,評估FUS-200細菌定量計數對篩檢尿路感染的靈敏度和特異性等。結果採用FUS-200對尿液細菌計數與常規細菌培養法檢測結果比較分析,靈敏度為51.7%;特異性為88.9%,暘性預測值為57.4%,陰性預測值為86.4%。結論採用FUS-200篩檢尿路感染,比常規尿液細菌培養更快速,尤其對陰性結果具有高度的預見性,可給臨床提供是否有細菌感染的參攷信息,但不可代替常規細菌培養。
목적:탐토FUS-200전자동뇨액분석계통(간칭FUS-200)대쾌속사검뇨로감염적응용개치。방법이FUS-200화상규세균배양법대268례뇨표본분별진행검측병비교분석,이세균배양결과위표준대조,평고FUS-200세균정량계수대사검뇨로감염적령민도화특이성등。결과채용FUS-200대뇨액세균계수여상규세균배양법검측결과비교분석,령민도위51.7%;특이성위88.9%,양성예측치위57.4%,음성예측치위86.4%。결론채용FUS-200사검뇨로감염,비상규뇨액세균배양경쾌속,우기대음성결과구유고도적예견성,가급림상제공시부유세균감염적삼고신식,단불가대체상규세균배양。
Objective To investigate the application value of FUS-200 automatic urine analysis system(FUS-200)in the rapid screening of urinary tract infection.Methods 268 cases of urine specimens were detected by FUS-200 and conventional bacterial culture,and the results were comparatively analyzed.According to the results of bacterial culture as standard control,the sensitivity and specificity of bacterial quantitative count for screening urinary tract infection of FUS-200 were evaluated.Results The results of FUS-200 quantitative bacterial counts and conventional bacterial culture were detected and comparative analyzed,the sensitivity was 51.7%,the specificity was 88.9%,the positive predictive value was 57.4%,and the negative predictive value was 86.4%.Conclusion The method of FUS-200 screening urinary tract infection is s faster than conventional urine bacteria culture,and especially it manifests higher predictability for the negative result.It can provid the reference information wether there is a bacterial infection for the clinical work,but can not replace the conventional bacterial culture.