CAJ | 학술논문

目的：系统评价慢性盆腔炎(CPID)中药灌肠与中药口服两种给药途径的疗效优势。方法：计算机检索Cochrane图书馆临床对照实验库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、中国学术期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库，检索相关学位论文及所获文献的参考文献，收集中药灌肠与中药口服治疗慢性盆腔炎的随机或半随机对照实验。结果：共纳入6个随机对照实验(RCT)，共计498例CPID患者。大部分实验方法学质量较低且样本含量小。 Meta分析结果显示中药灌肠组的总疗效优于中药口服组。结论：中药灌肠治疗慢性盆腔炎的疗效优于中药口服。
목적：계통평개만성분강염(CPID)중약관장여중약구복량충급약도경적료효우세。방법：계산궤검색Cochrane도서관림상대조실험고、MEDLINE、EMBASE、중국학술기간전문수거고(CNKI)、중국생물의학문헌수거고(CBM)、만방수거고，검색상관학위논문급소획문헌적삼고문헌，수집중약관장여중약구복치료만성분강염적수궤혹반수궤대조실험。결과：공납입6개수궤대조실험(RCT)，공계498례CPID환자。대부분실험방법학질량교저차양본함량소。 Meta분석결과현시중약관장조적총료효우우중약구복조。결론：중약관장치료만성분강염적료효우우중약구복。
Objective:To evaluate the advantages of treating chronic pelvic inflammatory disease (CPID) by TCM enema and oral administration systematically. Methods:All randomized or semi-randomized controlled trials of TCM enema and oral administration in treating CPID were collected from clinical controlled trials database of Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang database, the reference of related dissertations and the obtained literature with computer. Results:Altogether six RCTs were included and 498 patients involved. Most of the trials were of low quality and with small sampling. The results of Meta analysis showed that TCM enema group was superior to TCM oral administration group in total effects. Conclusion:Clinical effects of TCM enema are superior to these of oral TCM in treating CPID.