植物保护
植物保護
식물보호
PLANT PROTECTION
2014年
5期
121-125
,共5页
张海旺%房文文%刘翠翠%赵文生%彭友良
張海旺%房文文%劉翠翠%趙文生%彭友良
장해왕%방문문%류취취%조문생%팽우량
稻瘟病%品种抗瘟性%抗性鉴定%致病型
稻瘟病%品種抗瘟性%抗性鑒定%緻病型
도온병%품충항온성%항성감정%치병형
rice blast%resistance of variety against blast%resistance identification%pathotype
抗瘟品种的培育和抗瘟基因布局需要快速、准确、大规模地定性水稻抗源及其后代的抗瘟基因型和稻瘟菌致病型。为此,本研究建立了水稻离体叶片划伤接种方法。该方法依据主效抗瘟基因抵抗稻瘟菌在寄主体内扩展的特点,通过针刺在水稻叶片上造成伤口,避免了寄主侵入抗性的干扰,从而有利于抗扩展性的定性鉴定。作者利用活体喷雾接种、叶片无划伤接种和本研究建立的离体叶片划伤接种等3种接种方法,在秧苗4~6叶龄期,对菌株12-DG-68在24个水稻抗瘟单基因系上的致病反应进行了测定,结果显示:叶片划伤接种的检测结果稳定、一致;而叶片无划伤接种和活体喷雾接种的检测结果假抗性比例分别为12.5%和4.2%,不同叶龄期的叶片间反应型不一致率达7%。此外,离体叶片划伤接种还可利用菌丝块接种,以鉴定分生孢子产量低的菌株的致病型。因此,水稻叶片划伤接种是一种准确、稳定和方便的稻瘟菌接种方法,可用于大规模定性测定水稻抗源及其后代的抗瘟基因型和稻瘟菌的致病型。
抗瘟品種的培育和抗瘟基因佈跼需要快速、準確、大規模地定性水稻抗源及其後代的抗瘟基因型和稻瘟菌緻病型。為此,本研究建立瞭水稻離體葉片劃傷接種方法。該方法依據主效抗瘟基因牴抗稻瘟菌在寄主體內擴展的特點,通過針刺在水稻葉片上造成傷口,避免瞭寄主侵入抗性的榦擾,從而有利于抗擴展性的定性鑒定。作者利用活體噴霧接種、葉片無劃傷接種和本研究建立的離體葉片劃傷接種等3種接種方法,在秧苗4~6葉齡期,對菌株12-DG-68在24箇水稻抗瘟單基因繫上的緻病反應進行瞭測定,結果顯示:葉片劃傷接種的檢測結果穩定、一緻;而葉片無劃傷接種和活體噴霧接種的檢測結果假抗性比例分彆為12.5%和4.2%,不同葉齡期的葉片間反應型不一緻率達7%。此外,離體葉片劃傷接種還可利用菌絲塊接種,以鑒定分生孢子產量低的菌株的緻病型。因此,水稻葉片劃傷接種是一種準確、穩定和方便的稻瘟菌接種方法,可用于大規模定性測定水稻抗源及其後代的抗瘟基因型和稻瘟菌的緻病型。
항온품충적배육화항온기인포국수요쾌속、준학、대규모지정성수도항원급기후대적항온기인형화도온균치병형。위차,본연구건립료수도리체협편화상접충방법。해방법의거주효항온기인저항도온균재기주체내확전적특점,통과침자재수도협편상조성상구,피면료기주침입항성적간우,종이유리우항확전성적정성감정。작자이용활체분무접충、협편무화상접충화본연구건립적리체협편화상접충등3충접충방법,재앙묘4~6협령기,대균주12-DG-68재24개수도항온단기인계상적치병반응진행료측정,결과현시:협편화상접충적검측결과은정、일치;이협편무화상접충화활체분무접충적검측결과가항성비례분별위12.5%화4.2%,불동협령기적협편간반응형불일치솔체7%。차외,리체협편화상접충환가이용균사괴접충,이감정분생포자산량저적균주적치병형。인차,수도협편화상접충시일충준학、은정화방편적도온균접충방법,가용우대규모정성측정수도항원급기후대적항온기인형화도온균적치병형。
For rice blast resistance breeding and blast resistance gene deployment,it is required to establish an ac-curate,rapid and large scale inoculation method of Magnaporthe oryzae .Here,we report a wounding inoculation method of detached rice leaves.A key step of the method was to make wounds on rice leaves to avoid interference of host plant penetration resistance,which made use of the characteristics of major blast resistance genes that function against development and expansion of the fungal infection hyphae within host tissue.With the method developed in the present study,the leaf spot inoculation method and the spraying inoculation method,we assayed the reactions of 24 rice monogenic lines to a field isolate of M.oryzae ,12-DG-68,and compared reaction differ-ences between the three methods.The results showed that the wounding inoculation generated consistently identi-cal reactions to the isolate on rice leaves from any of the fourth,the fifth and the sixth stage seedlings.In con-trast,there were 12.5% and 4.2% false resistant reactions generated by the leaf spot inoculation method and the spraying inoculation method,respectively.With the two traditional inoculation methods,there were also approxi-mately 7% reactions that were inconsistent between leaves from different stages of rice seedlings.In addition,our wounding inoculation method could use mycelium blocks as inocula,which is useful for identifying the pathotypes of M.oryzae isolates that produce a small number of conidia.In summary,our results demonstrated that the wounding detached rice leaf inoculation is an accurate,stable and convenient method for large scale assay of the pathotypes of M.oryzae isolates.