CAJ | 학술논문

目的：评价肺癌支气管化疗栓塞（Brinchial artery chemoembolization，BACE）与双介入治疗的临床疗效。方法选择确诊的肺癌患者80例，随机分为两组：A组对照组40例单纯行支气管动脉化疗栓塞术（BACE），共97次；B组治疗组40例先行支气管动脉化疗栓塞术共103次，再行经皮穿刺肿瘤注射无水乙醇固化消融术（Percutaneous ethand injection，PEI）共172次。结果随访6~24个月，治疗组较对照组有效率明显提高（P＜0.05），中位生存期延长3个月。结论单纯BACE与BACE联合PEI治疗均达到较好效果，但BACE联合PEI治疗肺癌的疗效优于单纯BACE。
목적：평개폐암지기관화료전새（Brinchial artery chemoembolization，BACE）여쌍개입치료적림상료효。방법선택학진적폐암환자80례，수궤분위량조：A조대조조40례단순행지기관동맥화료전새술（BACE），공97차；B조치료조40례선행지기관동맥화료전새술공103차，재행경피천자종류주사무수을순고화소융술（Percutaneous ethand injection，PEI）공172차。결과수방6~24개월，치료조교대조조유효솔명현제고（P＜0.05），중위생존기연장3개월。결론단순BACE여BACE연합PEI치료균체도교호효과，단BACE연합PEI치료폐암적료효우우단순BACE。
Objective: To observe the curative ef ect and safety of BACE and double interventional treatment in lung carcinoma. Methods:Choose 80 lung carcinoma patients,divided into two groups(A and B):40 cases of groop A pure bronchial arterial chemoembolization (BACE),for 97 times;40 cases of group B first bronchial arterial chemoembolization for 103 times, and then underwent percutaneous ethanod injection for curing tumor ablation(Percutaneous ethanol injection, PEI)for 172 times. Result:Treatment set more the matched control Be ef icient to obviously raise (p<0.05), medium exist to expect to prolong for 3 months. Conclusion:Pure BACE and BACE combined PEI treatment achieved bet er ef ect,but the ef ect of BACE combined with PEI in the treatment of lung cancer is bet er than pure BACE.