检验医学与临床
檢驗醫學與臨床
검험의학여림상
JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE AND CLINICAL SCIENCES
2014年
3期
315-317
,共3页
张伟%江向明%刘文国%胡力%曾仪%彭磊
張偉%江嚮明%劉文國%鬍力%曾儀%彭磊
장위%강향명%류문국%호력%증의%팽뢰
肱骨骨折%老年%微创锁定钢板内固定术%闭合复位经皮穿针内固定术
肱骨骨摺%老年%微創鎖定鋼闆內固定術%閉閤複位經皮穿針內固定術
굉골골절%노년%미창쇄정강판내고정술%폐합복위경피천침내고정술
humeral fractures%elderly%minimally invasive locking plate fixation%closed reduction and percuta-neous pin fixation
目的:探讨微创锁定钢板内固定术治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效及其预后。方法选择2006年1月至2009年10月于崇州市人民医院骨科诊治的56例老年肱骨近端骨折患者,随机分为微创锁定钢板内固定术治疗组(微创组)和闭合复位经皮穿针内固定术治疗组(闭合组),每组各28例,比较两组患者术中出血量、手术时间、负重锻炼时间、住院时间、并发症发生情况、视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)、Neer评分、Mayo评分以及随访X线摄片检查结果。结果术后两组患者VAS评分均较术前明显下降(P<0.05),且术后第1、7天微创组VAS评分均明显小于闭合组(P<0.05)。微创组术中出血量、手术时间、可负重时间、骨性愈合时间、继发感染发生率和固定失败率均明显低于闭合组(P<0.05)。微创组Neer评分和Mayo评分优良率分别为85.71%和96.42%,均明显高于闭合组(P<0.05)。结论与闭合复位经皮穿针内固定术相比,微创锁定钢板内固定术治疗肱骨近端骨折可获得较满意的临床疗效,以及更好的关节功能恢复和预后。
目的:探討微創鎖定鋼闆內固定術治療老年肱骨近耑骨摺的臨床療效及其預後。方法選擇2006年1月至2009年10月于崇州市人民醫院骨科診治的56例老年肱骨近耑骨摺患者,隨機分為微創鎖定鋼闆內固定術治療組(微創組)和閉閤複位經皮穿針內固定術治療組(閉閤組),每組各28例,比較兩組患者術中齣血量、手術時間、負重鍛煉時間、住院時間、併髮癥髮生情況、視覺模擬評分(VAS評分)、Neer評分、Mayo評分以及隨訪X線攝片檢查結果。結果術後兩組患者VAS評分均較術前明顯下降(P<0.05),且術後第1、7天微創組VAS評分均明顯小于閉閤組(P<0.05)。微創組術中齣血量、手術時間、可負重時間、骨性愈閤時間、繼髮感染髮生率和固定失敗率均明顯低于閉閤組(P<0.05)。微創組Neer評分和Mayo評分優良率分彆為85.71%和96.42%,均明顯高于閉閤組(P<0.05)。結論與閉閤複位經皮穿針內固定術相比,微創鎖定鋼闆內固定術治療肱骨近耑骨摺可穫得較滿意的臨床療效,以及更好的關節功能恢複和預後。
목적:탐토미창쇄정강판내고정술치료노년굉골근단골절적림상료효급기예후。방법선택2006년1월지2009년10월우숭주시인민의원골과진치적56례노년굉골근단골절환자,수궤분위미창쇄정강판내고정술치료조(미창조)화폐합복위경피천침내고정술치료조(폐합조),매조각28례,비교량조환자술중출혈량、수술시간、부중단련시간、주원시간、병발증발생정황、시각모의평분(VAS평분)、Neer평분、Mayo평분이급수방X선섭편검사결과。결과술후량조환자VAS평분균교술전명현하강(P<0.05),차술후제1、7천미창조VAS평분균명현소우폐합조(P<0.05)。미창조술중출혈량、수술시간、가부중시간、골성유합시간、계발감염발생솔화고정실패솔균명현저우폐합조(P<0.05)。미창조Neer평분화Mayo평분우량솔분별위85.71%화96.42%,균명현고우폐합조(P<0.05)。결론여폐합복위경피천침내고정술상비,미창쇄정강판내고정술치료굉골근단골절가획득교만의적림상료효,이급경호적관절공능회복화예후。
Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and follow-up results of minimally invasive locking plate fixation for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients .Methods A total of 56 elderly cases of proximal humeral fractures ,treated in Department of Orthopedics ,Peoples′Hospital of Chongzhou City between Jan-uary 2006 and October 2009 ,were enrolled and randomly divided into minimally invasive locking plate fixation group (minimally invasive group) and closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation group (traditional group) ,and with 28 cases in each group .Blood loss ,operative time ,weight-bearing exercise time ,hospitalization time ,complications , visual analogue scales (VAS) score ,Neer score ,Mayo score and X-ray examination results during follow-up of the two groups were compared .Results After surgery ,VAS scores of the both groups were significantly decreased (P<0 .05) ,and VAS scores at postoperative 1 and 7 days in minimally invasive group were significantly less than traditional group (P<0 .05) .Intraoperative blood loss ,operation time ,weight-bearing exercise time ,time for bone healing ,incidence rate of secondary infection and rate of implant failure in minimally invasive group were significantly lower than traditional group (P<0 .05) .Excellent rates of Neer and Mayo scores in minimally invasive group were 85 .71% and 96 .42% ,which were significantly higher than traditional group (P<0 .05) .Conclusion Compared with closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation ,minimally invasive locking plate fixation for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures could obtain satisfactory clinical efficacy and better joint function recovery and prognosis .