现代诊断与治疗
現代診斷與治療
현대진단여치료
MODERN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT
2013年
18期
4081-4083
,共3页
邹晋梅%杨静%漆家高%邓代华%张羽%董建玲%李思吟%田岚
鄒晉梅%楊靜%漆傢高%鄧代華%張羽%董建玲%李思吟%田嵐
추진매%양정%칠가고%산대화%장우%동건령%리사음%전람
强直性脊柱炎%能量多普勒%骶髂关节炎
彊直性脊柱炎%能量多普勒%骶髂關節炎
강직성척주염%능량다보륵%저가관절염
Ankylosing Spondylitis%Power Doppler%Sacroiliitis
目的:评价能量多普勒与核磁共振对比,在早期强直性脊柱炎(Ankylosing Spondylitis,AS)患者骶髂关节炎诊断的价值。方法2012年1~12月间,绵阳市中心医院门诊及住院的病程<2年的强直性脊柱炎患者共50例,强直性脊柱炎诊断根据1984年修订的纽约标准。其中男44例,女6例,年龄15~42(25±4)岁,病程6~24(12±6)个月。每例患者都采用MRI检查骶髂关节病变,记录活动性骶髂关节炎共92个。对每位患者的两侧骶髂关节进行彩色多普勒检查,能量多普勒显示骶髂关节区域的血流信号,并测量血流阻力指数(resistance index,RI)。结果50例患者的100个骶髂关节显示有血流信号的87个,1级36例,2级51例,能量多普勒超声在其中81个骶髂关节血流信号中测得RI,RI为0.38~0.71,平均值0.48±0.16。χ2分析1显示,能量多普勒与MRI在检出骶髂关节病变方面差异不具有统计学意义(P=0.249)。分析能量多普勒发现的骶髂关节血流阻力指数与CRP、ESR、BASDI评分的关系发现,患者的炎症指标越高、BASDI评分越高,骶髂关节血流阻力指数越低。结论能量多普勒检查骶髂关节病变可作为诊断早期强直性脊柱炎的重要辅助检查,低阻血流是提示活动性强直性脊柱炎骶髂关节病变的重要线索。
目的:評價能量多普勒與覈磁共振對比,在早期彊直性脊柱炎(Ankylosing Spondylitis,AS)患者骶髂關節炎診斷的價值。方法2012年1~12月間,綿暘市中心醫院門診及住院的病程<2年的彊直性脊柱炎患者共50例,彊直性脊柱炎診斷根據1984年脩訂的紐約標準。其中男44例,女6例,年齡15~42(25±4)歲,病程6~24(12±6)箇月。每例患者都採用MRI檢查骶髂關節病變,記錄活動性骶髂關節炎共92箇。對每位患者的兩側骶髂關節進行綵色多普勒檢查,能量多普勒顯示骶髂關節區域的血流信號,併測量血流阻力指數(resistance index,RI)。結果50例患者的100箇骶髂關節顯示有血流信號的87箇,1級36例,2級51例,能量多普勒超聲在其中81箇骶髂關節血流信號中測得RI,RI為0.38~0.71,平均值0.48±0.16。χ2分析1顯示,能量多普勒與MRI在檢齣骶髂關節病變方麵差異不具有統計學意義(P=0.249)。分析能量多普勒髮現的骶髂關節血流阻力指數與CRP、ESR、BASDI評分的關繫髮現,患者的炎癥指標越高、BASDI評分越高,骶髂關節血流阻力指數越低。結論能量多普勒檢查骶髂關節病變可作為診斷早期彊直性脊柱炎的重要輔助檢查,低阻血流是提示活動性彊直性脊柱炎骶髂關節病變的重要線索。
목적:평개능량다보륵여핵자공진대비,재조기강직성척주염(Ankylosing Spondylitis,AS)환자저가관절염진단적개치。방법2012년1~12월간,면양시중심의원문진급주원적병정<2년적강직성척주염환자공50례,강직성척주염진단근거1984년수정적뉴약표준。기중남44례,녀6례,년령15~42(25±4)세,병정6~24(12±6)개월。매례환자도채용MRI검사저가관절병변,기록활동성저가관절염공92개。대매위환자적량측저가관절진행채색다보륵검사,능량다보륵현시저가관절구역적혈류신호,병측량혈류조력지수(resistance index,RI)。결과50례환자적100개저가관절현시유혈류신호적87개,1급36례,2급51례,능량다보륵초성재기중81개저가관절혈류신호중측득RI,RI위0.38~0.71,평균치0.48±0.16。χ2분석1현시,능량다보륵여MRI재검출저가관절병변방면차이불구유통계학의의(P=0.249)。분석능량다보륵발현적저가관절혈류조력지수여CRP、ESR、BASDI평분적관계발현,환자적염증지표월고、BASDI평분월고,저가관절혈류조력지수월저。결론능량다보륵검사저가관절병변가작위진단조기강직성척주염적중요보조검사,저조혈류시제시활동성강직성척주염저가관절병변적중요선색。
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of power Doppler in early Ankylosing Spondylitis sacroiliitis contrast with nuclear magnetic resonance (MRI). Methods 50 AS patients with course of disease less than 2 years were recruited in this study, and the diagnosis are ac-cording to New York criteria revised in 1984. Among these patients, 44 are male, 6 are female, ages between with 15 and 42, average 25±4, course of disease between with 6mo and 24 mo, av-erage 12 ±6 mo. Every patients' two sacroiliac joints accepted examination by MRI and power Doppler. Recorde the number of active sacroiliitis, if blood flow signal can be showed by power Doppler, then measure blood resistance index (RI). Results 87 sacroiliac joints showed blood flow signal, 36 were Grade 1,and 51were Grade 2, among these sacroiliac joints, 81 were measured RI, which number betweens with 0.38~0.71, average 0.48±0.16. χ2 analysis shows no significance dif-ference between MRI and power Doppler in detection of sacroiliitis. This study find out that the higher CRP、ESR and BASDI scores, the lower RI. Conclusion Power Doppler can be used as a very important assistant examination in early AS,low blood resistance index prompts active sacroiliitis.