CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较胫骨远端骨折切开复位内固定(ORIF)和有限切开内固定辅助外固定架外固定的临床效果。方法应用两种方法治疗胫骨远端骨折各32例。结果两组手术时间、术中术后出血量、愈合时间、并发症发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论按照骨折类型及软组织损伤情况，选择合适的手术方法，均可取得满意效果。
목적：비교경골원단골절절개복위내고정(ORIF)화유한절개내고정보조외고정가외고정적림상효과。방법응용량충방법치료경골원단골절각32례。결과량조수술시간、술중술후출혈량、유합시간、병발증발생솔무현저차이(P>0.05)。결론안조골절류형급연조직손상정황，선택합괄적수술방법，균가취득만의효과。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of external surgical approach open reduction & internal fixation(ORIF) and finite section internal fixation assisted external fixation in fixed frame for distal tibial fracture. Methods To apply two methods for distal tibial fracture with 32 cases in each. Results The operative time、intra-operative and post-operation on blood loss, the clinical fracture union and clinical complications were compared between two groups, the difference was not significant(P>0.05). Conclusions According to different pathological type,different operation methods were selected can get satisfactory effect.