浙江中医药大学学报
浙江中醫藥大學學報
절강중의약대학학보
JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY OF TRADITIONAL CHINESE MEDICINE
2014年
1期
78-81
,共4页
王琼%朱国苗%王爱斌%张鲁申
王瓊%硃國苗%王愛斌%張魯申
왕경%주국묘%왕애빈%장로신
股内收肌急性损伤%专业运动员%手法%SF-MPQ%早期干预
股內收肌急性損傷%專業運動員%手法%SF-MPQ%早期榦預
고내수기급성손상%전업운동원%수법%SF-MPQ%조기간예
thigh adductor acute injury%professional athletes%manual therapy%SF-MPQ%early intervention
[目的]观察手法配合常规理疗早期干预专业运动员股内收肌急性损伤的临床效果。[方法]采取前瞻性临床随机对照研究方法,将134名符合纳入标准的专业运动员随机分成观察组和对照组,观察组采用手法和常规理疗干预,对照组采用单纯常规理疗干预。采用简化McGil 疼痛量表(short-form McGil pain questionnaire,SF-MPQ)评估运动员治疗前、第1次治疗后及疗程结束后疼痛改善情况。[结果]第1次手法干预后,观察组SF-MPQ指数显著降低,与对照组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),疗程结束后观察组SF-MPQ 中疼痛分级量表(pain rating index,PRI)和疼痛视觉模拟评分量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)指数显著降低,与对照组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),但疼痛强度PPI指数(present pain index, PPI)与对照组相比无显著性差异(P=0.26)。[结论]手法配合常规理疗早期专业运动员股内收肌急性损伤具有显著的即刻镇痛效果,与常规理疗相比,手法配合常规理疗早期干预急性软组织损伤具有一定的优势。
[目的]觀察手法配閤常規理療早期榦預專業運動員股內收肌急性損傷的臨床效果。[方法]採取前瞻性臨床隨機對照研究方法,將134名符閤納入標準的專業運動員隨機分成觀察組和對照組,觀察組採用手法和常規理療榦預,對照組採用單純常規理療榦預。採用簡化McGil 疼痛量錶(short-form McGil pain questionnaire,SF-MPQ)評估運動員治療前、第1次治療後及療程結束後疼痛改善情況。[結果]第1次手法榦預後,觀察組SF-MPQ指數顯著降低,與對照組相比差異有統計學意義(P<0.01),療程結束後觀察組SF-MPQ 中疼痛分級量錶(pain rating index,PRI)和疼痛視覺模擬評分量錶(visual analogue scale,VAS)指數顯著降低,與對照組相比差異有統計學意義(P<0.01),但疼痛彊度PPI指數(present pain index, PPI)與對照組相比無顯著性差異(P=0.26)。[結論]手法配閤常規理療早期專業運動員股內收肌急性損傷具有顯著的即刻鎮痛效果,與常規理療相比,手法配閤常規理療早期榦預急性軟組織損傷具有一定的優勢。
[목적]관찰수법배합상규리료조기간예전업운동원고내수기급성손상적림상효과。[방법]채취전첨성림상수궤대조연구방법,장134명부합납입표준적전업운동원수궤분성관찰조화대조조,관찰조채용수법화상규리료간예,대조조채용단순상규리료간예。채용간화McGil 동통량표(short-form McGil pain questionnaire,SF-MPQ)평고운동원치료전、제1차치료후급료정결속후동통개선정황。[결과]제1차수법간예후,관찰조SF-MPQ지수현저강저,여대조조상비차이유통계학의의(P<0.01),료정결속후관찰조SF-MPQ 중동통분급량표(pain rating index,PRI)화동통시각모의평분량표(visual analogue scale,VAS)지수현저강저,여대조조상비차이유통계학의의(P<0.01),단동통강도PPI지수(present pain index, PPI)여대조조상비무현저성차이(P=0.26)。[결론]수법배합상규리료조기전업운동원고내수기급성손상구유현저적즉각진통효과,여상규리료상비,수법배합상규리료조기간예급성연조직손상구유일정적우세。
[Objective]To observe the clinical effect of manual therapy early intervention on professional athletes thigh adductor acute injury. [Methods]A prospective randomized control ed clinical 134 cases met the inclusion criteria, at the same time did not meet the exclusion criteria of profession athletes, who were randomly divided into two groups, treatment and control groups, the manipulation group receiving manual therapy plus rountine physiotherapy intervention while the control one just routine physiotherapy intervention. Short-form McGil pain questionnaire(SF-MPQ) is used to evaluate pain be-fore and after the first treatment and the last treatment. [Results] After first intervention, the treatment group could statistical y significantly reduce the pain index(P<0.01). At the end of the treatment, compared with the control group the treatment one reduced PRI and VAS index statistical y( P<0.01), while the PPI index had no significant advantage(P=0.26). [Conclusion]Manual therapy combined with conventional physiotherapy is much better than mere conventional physiotherapy on early intervention of thigh adductor acute injury which means analgesic effect is remarkable.Manual therapy early interven-tion has certain advantages on thigh adductor acute injury.